Cavese vs Picerno: match statistics
Cavese show solid home form with a balanced record of 33% wins, draws, and losses at their stadium, indicating evenly matched performances in front of their home crowd. A key asset for the hosts is their positive goal difference in home matches (+2) and higher xG values (1.41 vs 1.24), pointing to an offensive edge. Picerno perform significantly worse in away matches, recording as many as 53% defeats and a negative goal difference (-10), with only a 27% away win rate. The visitors concede an average of 1.8 goals per away match, which, combined with their low clean sheet rate (13%), represents a significant weakness. Although both teams have a similar points tally in their last five matches, Cavese's home advantage and Picerno's away struggles favor a home win, though the balanced nature of both sides means a draw is also a realistic scenario.
Cavese vs Picerno: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cavese played against Picerno in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on March 8, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Cavese has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Picerno has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Cavese scores 0.93 goals per game and allows 1.20. Picerno scores 1.17 and allows 1.53. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Cavese's games and 63% of Picerno's. The Over 2.5 rates are 37% and 57%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cavese has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.17 per game. Cavese takes 10.5 shots per game, while Picerno takes 9.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Cavese leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Picerno leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cavese's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For Picerno, it is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group C games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cavese show solid home form with a balanced record of 33% wins, draws, and losses at their stadium, indicating evenly matched performances in front of their home crowd. A key asset for the hosts is their positive goal difference in home matches (+2) and higher xG values (1.41 vs 1.24), pointing to an offensive edge. Picerno perform significantly worse in away matches, recording as many as 53% defeats and a negative goal difference (-10), with only a 27% away win rate. The visitors concede an average of 1.8 goals per away match, which, combined with their low clean sheet rate (13%), represents a significant weakness. Although both teams have a similar points tally in their last five matches, Cavese's home advantage and Picerno's away struggles favor a home win, though the balanced nature of both sides means a draw is also a realistic scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cavese | Picerno | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Picerno is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Cavese · 1.6 pts / game - Picerno
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Picerno is 26% better for: goals scored per game.
0.93 goals / game - Cavese · 1.17 goals / game - Picerno
Cavese is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.2 goals / game - Cavese · 1.53 goals / game - Picerno
Cavese scores in 60% of games (18 of 30 meczów), while Picerno keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 meczów).
Picerno scores in 73% of games (22 of 30 meczów), while Cavese keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cavese
Over / Under - Picerno
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Picerno is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / game - Cavese · 1.5 pts / game - Picerno
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cavese - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Picerno - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 23%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cavese
Picerno
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Cavese | Liga | Picerno | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.13 | 2.47 | ▲ 2.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 48% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 46% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 30% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 66% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | • 77% | 78% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Cavese's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Picerno. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cavese vs Picerno?
The Serie C Group C match finished Cavese 2:0 Picerno. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cavese vs Picerno?
Cavese score 0.93 goals per game on average and Picerno 1.17. The Serie C Group C average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Cavese's matches and 63% of Picerno's.
What form are Cavese and Picerno in?
Over the last 5 games Cavese have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Picerno 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cavese vs Picerno?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cavese vs Picerno: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.