Cavese vs Siracusa: match statistics
Cavese vs Siracusa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cavese played against Siracusa in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on December 13, 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Cavese has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Siracusa has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Cavese scores 1.12 goals per game and allows 1.35. Siracusa scores 1.06 and allows 1.65. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 41% of Cavese's games and 59% of Siracusa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 59%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Siracusa has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.36 per game. Cavese takes 10.7 shots per game, while Siracusa takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Cavese leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. Siracusa leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.65 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cavese's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Siracusa, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group C games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cavese | Siracusa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Siracusa is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Cavese · 1.6 pts / game - Siracusa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cavese is 6% better for: goals scored per game.
1.12 goals / game - Cavese · 1.06 goals / game - Siracusa
Cavese is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.35 goals / game - Cavese · 1.65 goals / game - Siracusa
Cavese scores in 59% of games (10 of 17 meczów), while Siracusa keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 17 meczów).
Siracusa scores in 59% of games (10 of 17 meczów), while Cavese keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cavese
Over / Under - Siracusa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cavese is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / game - Cavese · 1.06 pts / game - Siracusa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cavese - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 24%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Siracusa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cavese
Siracusa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Cavese | Liga | Siracusa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.47 | 2.59 | ▲ 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 52% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 51% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | • 29% | 28% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 66% | • 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 80% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Cavese vs Siracusa?
The Serie C Group C match finished Cavese 1:1 Siracusa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cavese vs Siracusa?
Cavese score 1.12 goals per game on average and Siracusa 1.06. The Serie C Group C average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Cavese's matches and 59% of Siracusa's.
What form are Cavese and Siracusa in?
Over the last 5 games Cavese have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Siracusa 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cavese vs Siracusa?
The statistical background for Cavese vs Siracusa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.