CD Castellón vs FC Andorra: match statistics
CD Castellón shows decidedly better home form with 64% of home matches won and an impressive series of eleven victories in recent home games. The hosts score an average of 2.18 goals per home match with an xG of 1.85, indicating efficient finishing. FC Andorra has poor away results with only 33% of wins and a negative goal difference of minus five, conceding an average of 1.58 goals per away match. A key factor is also Castellón's advantage in ball possession (57% vs 58%) and significantly higher shooting accuracy (13% vs 9%). Despite both teams having identical PPG in their last five matches, the home advantage and head-to-head statistics favor the hosts, although FC Andorra may put up resistance, which justifies the relatively high probability of a draw.
CD Castellón vs FC Andorra: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
CD Castellón played against FC Andorra in Segunda División (Spain). The game was played on February 1, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
CD Castellón has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. FC Andorra has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
CD Castellón scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.09. FC Andorra scores 1.13 and allows 1.35. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of CD Castellón's games and 70% of FC Andorra's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 52%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
CD Castellón has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.55 per game. CD Castellón takes 14.5 shots per game, while FC Andorra takes 14.0.
First-half and second-half trends
CD Castellón leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.87 goals per game after halftime. FC Andorra leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.74 after halftime.
When the teams score
CD Castellón's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For FC Andorra, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Segunda División games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CD Castellón shows decidedly better home form with 64% of home matches won and an impressive series of eleven victories in recent home games. The hosts score an average of 2.18 goals per home match with an xG of 1.85, indicating efficient finishing. FC Andorra has poor away results with only 33% of wins and a negative goal difference of minus five, conceding an average of 1.58 goals per away match. A key factor is also Castellón's advantage in ball possession (57% vs 58%) and significantly higher shooting accuracy (13% vs 9%). Despite both teams having identical PPG in their last five matches, the home advantage and head-to-head statistics favor the hosts, although FC Andorra may put up resistance, which justifies the relatively high probability of a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| CD Castellón | FC Andorra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CD Castellón is 39% better for: goals scored per game.
1.57 goals / game - CD Castellón · 1.13 goals / game - FC Andorra
CD Castellón is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.09 goals / game - CD Castellón · 1.35 goals / game - FC Andorra
CD Castellón scores in 65% of games (15 of 23 meczów), while FC Andorra keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 meczów).
FC Andorra scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 meczów), while CD Castellón keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CD Castellón
Over / Under - FC Andorra
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CD Castellón is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.52 pts / game - CD Castellón · 1.17 pts / game - FC Andorra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CD Castellón - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
FC Andorra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
CD Castellón
FC Andorra
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).
Teams vs league
| CD Castellón | Liga | FC Andorra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.65 | 2.53 | • 2.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 55% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 49% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 28% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 65% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 75% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from CD Castellón's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against FC Andorra. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of CD Castellón vs FC Andorra?
The Segunda División match finished CD Castellón 2:0 FC Andorra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CD Castellón vs FC Andorra?
CD Castellón score 1.57 goals per game on average and FC Andorra 1.13. The Segunda División average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 52% of CD Castellón's matches and 70% of FC Andorra's.
What form are CD Castellón and FC Andorra in?
Over the last 5 games CD Castellón have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and FC Andorra 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Castellón vs FC Andorra?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.