Portugal - Liga 3Data current as of 22 July 2026

CD Mafra vs Amarante: match statistics

CD Mafra crest
CD Mafra
1 : 4half-time 0:1
Amarante crest
Amarante

CD Mafra vs Amarante: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Mafra play Amarante in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

CD Mafra: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Amarante: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Mafra scores 1.41 and concedes 1.34 goals per match. Amarante scores 1.28 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Mafra 63%, Amarante 47%. Over 2.5: CD Mafra 47%, Amarante 41%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

CD Mafra has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.07. CD Mafra: 10.3 shots per match, Amarante: 8.1.

Match halves

CD Mafra: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.81. Amarante: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

CD Mafra: 76-90+ (11 goals). Amarante: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Mafra has a strong home profile: 62% of home matches won, averaging 1.54 goals scored and only 0.92 conceded, with home xG 1.36 versus xG against 1.07, confirming offensive efficiency and relative defensive solidity. Amarante arrive in good form — in the last 5 matches they have 3 wins and 2 draws, scored 7 goals in that period and have a 5-match points average of 2.2, but on the road they score only 1.00 goal on average and have as many as 38% of away matches without scoring. Mafra’s superiority in shots (10.31 vs 7.77) and shots on target (4.38 vs 2.77) and a lower percentage of matches without a goal (8% vs 38%) suggest the hosts create more high-quality chances and convert them more often (shot conversion 15% vs 13%). On the other hand Amarante’s away xG against (1.47) exceeds their own xG (1.02), which means the visitors allow better chances than their current conceded-goal figure of 0.92 indicates; this is a risk factor for the away side. Considering Mafra’s superior home efficiency and the present metrics, I forecast a home win and assess their probability at about 55%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
CD MafraAmarante
13Shots10
CD MafraAmarante
6Shots on target6
CD MafraAmarante
1.76xG1.41
CD MafraAmarante
4Corners2
CD MafraAmarante
71Dangerous attacks49
CD MafraAmarante
-1Fouls-1
CD MafraAmarante
1Cards1
CD MafraAmarante

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.41Goals scored / match1.28
CD MafraAmarante
1.34Goals conceded / match0.88
CD MafraAmarante
50%Average possession45%
CD MafraAmarante
4.5Shots on target / match2.91
CD MafraAmarante

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.28Shots per match8.09
CD MafraAmarante
4.5Shots on target2.91
CD MafraAmarante
13.7%Shot conversion15.8%
CD MafraAmarante
50%Possession45%
CD MafraAmarante
1.41xG for1.07
CD MafraAmarante
1.27xG against1.33
CD MafraAmarante

Shooting quality

CD Mafra: Efficient finishingAmarante: Counter-attacking
CD MafraAmarante
Accuracy (shots on target)44%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amarante is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - CD Mafra · 2.2 pts / match - Amarante

CD Mafra
LWWDL
Season result split
44% W28% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-9
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Amarante
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
53% W28% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-9-6
1.88 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-4-4
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Mafra is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.41 goals / match - CD Mafra · 1.28 goals / match - Amarante

Amarante is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.34 goals / match - CD Mafra · 0.88 goals / match - Amarante

CD Mafra scoring profile: very strong

CD Mafra scores in 88% of matches (28 of 32 matches), while Amarante keeps a clean sheet in 41% (13 of 32 matches).

Amarante scoring profile: strong

Amarante scores in 75% of matches (24 of 32 matches), while CD Mafra keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).

45Goals scored (season)41
CD MafraAmarante
43Goals conceded (season)28
CD MafraAmarante
2.75Average goals in match2.16
CD MafraAmarante
8Goals scored (last 5)10
CD MafraAmarante
10Goals conceded (last 5)4
CD MafraAmarante

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal75%
CD MafraAmarante
38%2 goals34%
CD MafraAmarante
13%3 goals16%
CD MafraAmarante
3%4 goals3%
CD MafraAmarante

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal59%
CD MafraAmarante
34%2 goals25%
CD MafraAmarante
22%3 goals3%
CD MafraAmarante
9%4 goals0%
CD MafraAmarante

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time16%
CD MafraAmarante
6%BTTS in both halves9%
CD MafraAmarante
28%Scored in both halves22%
CD MafraAmarante

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
CD MafraAmarante
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
CD MafraAmarante
60%BTTS - last 560%
CD MafraAmarante

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
CD MafraAmarante
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
CD MafraAmarante
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
CD MafraAmarante

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
CD MafraAmarante
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
CD MafraAmarante
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
CD MafraAmarante

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Mafra is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - CD Mafra · 1.25 pts / match - Amarante

CD Mafra - half-time state
34% leading34% draw31% trailing
Amarante - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.25
CD MafraAmarante
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.47
CD MafraAmarante
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
CD MafraAmarante
1.13Average goals (1st half)0.91
CD MafraAmarante
59%Clean sheet before half-time63%
CD MafraAmarante
56%No goal before half-time59%
CD MafraAmarante

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.72
CD MafraAmarante
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
CD MafraAmarante
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
CD MafraAmarante
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.25
CD MafraAmarante
47%Clean sheet after half-time59%
CD MafraAmarante
28%No goal after half-time44%
CD MafraAmarante

CD Mafra - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
44
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Amarante - second-half results

44% W41% R16% P
40
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding212%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Mafra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.8
Average goals in match0.82.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Amarante - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Mafra
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
8
31-45
8
7
46-60
7
10
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Amarante
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
7
1
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
3
46-60
10
3
61-75
13
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Mafra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Amarante

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD MafraLigaAmarante
Average goals in match 2.752.23 2.16
Both teams scored 63%49% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%40% 41%
Clean sheets 31%31% 41%
Goal before half-time 69%66% 63%
Goal after half-time 81%74% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CD Mafra 0 - 0 - 1 Amarante. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CD Mafra vs Amarante?

The Liga 3 match finished CD Mafra 1:4 Amarante. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Mafra vs Amarante?

CD Mafra score 1.41 goals per game on average and Amarante 1.28. The Liga 3 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 63% of CD Mafra's matches and 47% of Amarante's.

What form are CD Mafra and Amarante in?

Over the last 5 games CD Mafra have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Amarante 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Mafra vs Amarante?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.