CD Mafra vs Lusitano Évora 1911: match statistics
CD Mafra vs Lusitano Évora 1911: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
CD Mafra played against Lusitano Évora 1911 in Liga 3 (Portugal). The game was played on November 30, 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
CD Mafra has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Lusitano Évora 1911 has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
CD Mafra scores 1.30 goals per game and allows 1.00. Lusitano Évora 1911 scores 1.10 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.04 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of CD Mafra's games and 40% of Lusitano Évora 1911's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 30%, compared with league averages of 42% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lusitano Évora 1911 has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.28 per game. CD Mafra takes 9.3 shots per game, while Lusitano Évora 1911 takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
CD Mafra leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Lusitano Évora 1911 leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
CD Mafra's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Lusitano Évora 1911, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 3 games average 2.04 goals. Both teams score in 42% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| CD Mafra | Lusitano Évora 1911 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
CD Mafra is 33% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - CD Mafra · 1.8 pts / game - Lusitano Évora 1911
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CD Mafra is 18% better for: goals scored per game.
1.3 goals / game - CD Mafra · 1.1 goals / game - Lusitano Évora 1911
CD Mafra scores in 90% of games (9 of 10 meczów), while Lusitano Évora 1911 keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 meczów).
Lusitano Évora 1911 scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 meczów), while CD Mafra keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CD Mafra
Over / Under - Lusitano Évora 1911
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CD Mafra is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / game - CD Mafra · 1.2 pts / game - Lusitano Évora 1911
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CD Mafra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Lusitano Évora 1911 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
CD Mafra
Lusitano Évora 1911
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).
Teams vs league
| CD Mafra | Liga | Lusitano Évora 1911 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.30 | 2.04 | • 2.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 42% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 40% | 33% | ▼ 30% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 36% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 73% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Lusitano Évora 1911SubstitutionOn: Ángel Antonio Gomes ArevaloOff: Tiago Alexandre Gorgulho Baptista
Head-to-head
Record from CD Mafra's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Lusitano Évora 1911. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of CD Mafra vs Lusitano Évora 1911?
The Liga 3 match finished CD Mafra 1:1 Lusitano Évora 1911. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CD Mafra vs Lusitano Évora 1911?
CD Mafra score 1.30 goals per game on average and Lusitano Évora 1911 1.10. The Liga 3 average is 2.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 60% of CD Mafra's matches and 40% of Lusitano Évora 1911's.
What form are CD Mafra and Lusitano Évora 1911 in?
Over the last 5 games CD Mafra have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Lusitano Évora 1911 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Mafra vs Lusitano Évora 1911?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.