El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of September 06, 2026

CD Platense vs FAS: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
2 : 3half-time 0:0
FAS crest
FAS
125%(3.53)
X30%(3.30)
245%(1.94)

FAS demonstrates decidedly better form, winning all of their last five matches and scoring 10 goals while conceding just 2. The visiting team has an impressive season record with 21 victories and only 5 defeats, whereas CD Platense has won just 7 matches with 13 losses. In away games, FAS achieves a 41% win rate and averages 1.88 goals per match, outperforming CD Platense at home (18% wins, 1.29 goals). FAS's positive goal difference on the road (+12) contrasts with the hosts' zero balance. Although CD Platense's high draw percentage at home (53%) suggests a potential split of points, the current form and quality of FAS argue for their victory. xG statistics also confirm the visitors' advantage (1.57 vs 1.32 for the hosts).

CD Platense vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

CD Platense played against FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Recent form

CD Platense has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. FAS has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

CD Platense scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 1.47. FAS scores 2.06 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 59% of CD Platense's games and 57% of FAS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 51%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FAS has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.22 per game. CD Platense takes 8.1 shots per game, while FAS takes 11.0.

First-half and second-half trends

CD Platense leads at halftime in 24% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. FAS leads at halftime in 40% and scores 1.11 after halftime.

When the teams score

CD Platense's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For FAS, it is minutes 76-90+ (22 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FAS demonstrates decidedly better form, winning all of their last five matches and scoring 10 goals while conceding just 2. The visiting team has an impressive season record with 21 victories and only 5 defeats, whereas CD Platense has won just 7 matches with 13 losses. In away games, FAS achieves a 41% win rate and averages 1.88 goals per match, outperforming CD Platense at home (18% wins, 1.29 goals). FAS's positive goal difference on the road (+12) contrasts with the hosts' zero balance. Although CD Platense's high draw percentage at home (53%) suggests a potential split of points, the current form and quality of FAS argue for their victory. xG statistics also confirm the visitors' advantage (1.57 vs 1.32 for the hosts).

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 3
Second half

Game stats

40Possession (%)60
CD PlatenseFAS
7Shots12
CD PlatenseFAS
3Shots on target6
CD PlatenseFAS
0.9xG1.48
CD PlatenseFAS
0Corners10
CD PlatenseFAS
32Dangerous attacks40
CD PlatenseFAS
-1Fouls-1
CD PlatenseFAS
-1Cards-1
CD PlatenseFAS

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.26Goals scored / game2.06
CD PlatenseFAS
1.47Goals allowed / game1
CD PlatenseFAS
47%Average possession53%
CD PlatenseFAS
3.59Shots on target / game5
CD PlatenseFAS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.12Shots per game11
CD PlatenseFAS
3.59Shots on target5
CD PlatenseFAS
15.6%Shot conversion18.7%
CD PlatenseFAS
47%Possession53%
CD PlatenseFAS
1.22xG for1.54
CD PlatenseFAS
1.36xG against1.2
CD PlatenseFAS

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Counter-attackingFAS: Efficient finishing
CD PlatenseFAS
Accuracy (shots on target)44%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FAS is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - CD Platense · 3 pts / game - FAS

CD Platense
LLDDW
Season result split
21% W41% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-14-13
1.03 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-9-5
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
FAS
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
60% W26% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-9-5
2.06 pts / game · goal difference +37
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
7-7-3
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 63% better for: goals scored per game.

1.26 goals / game - CD Platense · 2.06 goals / game - FAS

FAS is 47% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.47 goals / game - CD Platense · 1 goals / game - FAS

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 68% of games (23 of 34 meczów), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 34% (12 of 35 meczów).

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 89% of games (31 of 35 meczów), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 meczów).

43Goals scored (season)72
CD PlatenseFAS
50Goals conceded (season)35
CD PlatenseFAS
2.74Average goals per game3.06
CD PlatenseFAS
7Goals scored (last 5)10
CD PlatenseFAS
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
CD PlatenseFAS

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal89%
CD PlatenseFAS
32%2 goals60%
CD PlatenseFAS
21%3 goals34%
CD PlatenseFAS
6%4 goals11%
CD PlatenseFAS

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal66%
CD PlatenseFAS
35%2 goals26%
CD PlatenseFAS
18%3 goals9%
CD PlatenseFAS
9%4 goals0%
CD PlatenseFAS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time17%
CD PlatenseFAS
6%BTTS in both halves9%
CD PlatenseFAS
15%Scored in both halves46%
CD PlatenseFAS

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
CD PlatenseFAS
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
CD PlatenseFAS
60%BTTS - last 540%
CD PlatenseFAS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
CD PlatenseFAS
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
CD PlatenseFAS
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
CD PlatenseFAS

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
CD PlatenseFAS
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time51%
CD PlatenseFAS
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
CD PlatenseFAS

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / game - CD Platense · 1.63 pts / game - FAS

CD Platense - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing
FAS - half-time state
40% leading43% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per game (1st half)1.63
CD PlatenseFAS
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.91
CD PlatenseFAS
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
CD PlatenseFAS
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.31
CD PlatenseFAS
50%Clean sheet before half-time66%
CD PlatenseFAS
59%No goal before half-time43%
CD PlatenseFAS

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per game (2nd half)1.74
CD PlatenseFAS
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)1.11
CD PlatenseFAS
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
CD PlatenseFAS
1.53Average goals (2nd half)1.69
CD PlatenseFAS
47%Clean sheet after half-time54%
CD PlatenseFAS
59%No goal after half-time26%
CD PlatenseFAS

CD Platense - second-half results

15% W50% R35% P
40
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 21%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FAS - second-half results

46% W37% R17% P
57
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+18
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

CD Platense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
FAS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.202.20
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.4
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
6
6
16-30
10
8
31-45
7
6
46-60
9
11
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

FAS
ScoredConceded
9
3
0-15
13
3
16-30
11
9
31-45
6
8
46-60
11
2
61-75
22
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (22 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+90%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaFAS
Average goals per game 2.742.73 3.06
Both teams scored 59%56% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%53% 51%
Clean sheets 21%26% 34%
Goal before half-time 71%68% 74%
Goal after half-time 68%78% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / game
1.37
Away goals / game
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Johan Carlos Bogotá Valencia⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Dustin Clifman Corea Garay⚽ 1
Nelson Wilfredo Bonilla Sánchez⚽ 1
Rudy Geovanny Clavel Mendoza⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FASGoalRudy Geovanny Clavel Mendoza
  2. FASGoalDustin Clifman Corea Garay
  3. CD PlatenseGoalJohan Carlos Bogotá Valencia
  4. FASGoalNelson Wilfredo Bonilla Sánchez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Filiberto MartinezMatches officiated: 12
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 242%Home wins33%Draws25%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from CD Platense's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against FAS. Games average 5.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAS
4 : 1
CD Platense
CD Platense
3 : 3
FAS

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs FAS?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 2:3 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and FAS?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 0, FAS won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs FAS?

CD Platense score 1.26 goals per game on average and FAS 2.06. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of CD Platense's matches and 57% of FAS's.

What form are CD Platense and FAS in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and FAS 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs FAS?

The statistical background for CD Platense vs FAS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.