El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónComplejo Deportivo Tierra de JuegoData current as of October 22, 2026

CD Platense vs Isidro Metapán: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Isidro Metapán crest
Isidro Metapán

CD Platense vs Isidro Metapán: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

CD Platense played against Isidro Metapán in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on September 9, 2026. Venue: Complejo Deportivo Tierra de Juego. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

CD Platense has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Isidro Metapán has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

CD Platense scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.25. Isidro Metapán scores 1.38 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.52 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of CD Platense's games and 38% of Isidro Metapán's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 38%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Isidro Metapán has the higher season xG average, 1.83 to 1.32 per game. CD Platense takes 8.0 shots per game, while Isidro Metapán takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

CD Platense leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Isidro Metapán leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

CD Platense's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Isidro Metapán, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.52 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CD Platense have a clear home advantage: they have won 50% of their home matches, while Isidro Metapán have won only 25% of their away games and lost as many as 50%. The hosts average 1.50 goals at home with an xG of 1.73, while the visitors score 1.25 goals away from home and have failed to find the net in 50% of their outings. Metapán enjoy more possession (57% vs. 48%) and generate a slightly higher xG, 1.84 compared with 1.73, but their away defense allows opponents an xG of 1.63. Both teams have recorded an identical 1.4 points per game over their last five fixtures, but Platense have posted a home run of two wins, one draw and one defeat. With the defenses closely matched, both conceding 1.50 goals per game in the relevant conditions, Platense’s greater attacking consistency at home points to a narrow victory for the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to CD Platense’s highly solid defense, which concedes an average of just 0.33 goals at home and keeps a clean sheet in 67% of matches. Platense scores an average of 2.0 goals per match, while Isidro Metapán fail to score in 50% of their appearances, making the most likely scenario a home win with a clean sheet. The season BTTS rate is just 33% for Platense and 50% for Metapán, while in their last five matches, both teams recorded BTTS in only 40% of games, below the league average of 49%. The visitors do create chances worth 1.84 xG and register 7.25 shots on target per match, but they will face a Platense defense with an xG conceded of 0.93. Recent form over the last five matches also offers no clear support for goals from both sides, as Metapán averaged 1.0 goals and Platense 1.2.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Platense score an average of 2.00 goals at home, but Isidro Metapán concede only 1.50 goals away, which limits the hosts’ projection to around 1.45 goals. The visitors create plenty of chances, with an average xG of 1.84 and 7.25 shots on target; however, Platense concede just 0.33 goals per home game and keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches. In their last five games, both teams have been scoring more modestly, averaging 1.20 and 1.00 goals per match respectively, while their games have ended with an average of around 2.3 goals. The 3.5 line is further supported by the fact that 100% of Platense’s home games have ended with a maximum of three goals, compared with the league average of 2.59 goals. The strongest option is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as even with the visitors’ attacking activity, a four-goal scenario would require a clear breakdown of the hosts’ solid defensive structure.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

CD Platense have a clear advantage in the home data: they have won 100% of their matches, averaging 2.00 goals scored and conceding just 0.33, while Isidro Metapán lose 50% of their away matches and concede 1.50 goals per game. The first-half signal is particularly strong: the hosts led at the break in 67% of matches, scored an average of 1.00 goal and conceded none, while the visitors have never gone into half-time in the lead and were behind in 75% of cases. Platense keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches, while Metapán have failed to score in 50% of their away fixtures, limiting the visitors’ chances of completing a turnaround after the break. Although the teams’ last five matches were more evenly balanced, the hosts have a better shot-conversion rate, 18% compared with 11%, and their advantage from the outset makes the HT/FT 1/1 scenario—leading at half-time and winning at full-time—the most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

39Possession (%)61
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
6Shots12
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
2Shots on target6
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
1.15xG1.9
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
3Corners4
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
86Dangerous attacks99
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
12Fouls13
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
0Cards0
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
1.25Goals scored / game1.38
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
1.25Goals allowed / game1
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
49%Average possession56%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
4.25Shots on target / game7.25
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8Shots per game11.88
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
4.25Shots on target7.25
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
15.6%Shot conversion11.6%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
49%Possession56%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
1.32xG for1.83
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
1.4xG against1.26
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Efficient finishingIsidro Metapán: Balanced
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
Accuracy (shots on target)53%61%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

CD Platense is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - CD Platense · 1.2 pts / game - Isidro Metapán

CD Platense
WLDLW
Season result split
38% W38% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-2
1.50 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 at home
2-1-1
WWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Isidro Metapán
WLWLL
Season result split
50% W13% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-3
1.63 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
WDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.98Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Isidro Metapán is 10% better for: goals scored per game.

1.25 goals / game - CD Platense · 1.38 goals / game - Isidro Metapán

Isidro Metapán is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - CD Platense · 1 goals / game - Isidro Metapán

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while Isidro Metapán keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 games).

Isidro Metapán scoring profile: very strong

Isidro Metapán scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 games), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 games).

10Goals scored (season)11
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
10Goals conceded (season)8
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
2.5Average goals per game2.38
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
6Goals scored (last 5)5
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal63%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
50%2 goals50%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
0%3 goals13%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
0%4 goals13%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal63%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
25%2 goals25%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
13%3 goals13%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
0%4 goals0%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time0%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
13%BTTS in both halves0%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
25%Scored in both halves13%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
60%BTTS - last 540%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Platense is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / game - CD Platense · 1 pts / game - Isidro Metapán

CD Platense - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Isidro Metapán - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per game (1st half)1
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.38
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
1.13Average goals (1st half)0.88
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
50%No goal before half-time75%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)1.63
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)1
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.5
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
50%Clean sheet after half-time63%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán
50%No goal after half-time50%
CD PlatenseIsidro Metapán

CD Platense - second-half results

38% W38% D25% L
10
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Isidro Metapán - second-half results

38% W50% D13% L
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

CD Platense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Isidro Metapán - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.60
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Isidro Metapán
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Isidro Metapán

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaIsidro Metapán
Average goals per game• 2.502.52▼ 2.38
Both teams scored▲ 63%46%▼ 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%44%▼ 38%
Clean sheets▼ 13%33%▲ 38%
Goal before half-time▲ 75%58%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 75%71%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / game
1.04
Away goals / game
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

—Steven Antonio Guerra Tejada⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Isidro MetapánGoalSteven Antonio Guerra Tejada

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from CD Platense's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Isidro Metapán. Games average 1.75 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.

Isidro Metapán
0 : 2
CD Platense
CD Platense
1 : 1
Isidro Metapán
Isidro Metapán
0 : 0
CD Platense
CD Platense
3 : 0
Isidro Metapán

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs Isidro Metapán?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 1:2 Isidro Metapán. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and Isidro Metapán?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 2, Isidro Metapán won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs Isidro Metapán?

CD Platense score 1.25 goals per game on average and Isidro Metapán 1.38. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 63% of CD Platense's matches and 38% of Isidro Metapán's.

What form are CD Platense and Isidro Metapán in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Isidro Metapán 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs Isidro Metapán?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.