CD Tondela vs AVS: match statistics
CD Tondela holds a clear advantage as the home team in this clash between two bottom-table sides. Although Tondela occupies 17th place, their home record (8% wins) is decidedly better than AVS's away record, as they have not won any away matches this season (0% wins). AVS concedes an average of 2.83 goals per away match, which is an alarming figure, while Tondela has scored an average of 0.69 goals at home. The form of both teams over the last 5 matches is similar (Tondela 1.2 PPG vs AVS 1.0 PPG), but the home advantage and AVS's catastrophic away statistics (goal difference -26) speak in favor of the hosts. The expected goals (xG) outcome also favors Tondela (1.22 vs 1.06), suggesting their greater offensive efficiency in home matches. The high percentage of draws for both teams (38% Tondela, 25% AVS) along with defensive issues for both sides mean that a draw also remains a realistic scenario.
CD Tondela vs AVS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
CD Tondela played against AVS in Liga NOS (Portugal). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
CD Tondela has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. AVS has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
CD Tondela scores 0.76 goals per game and allows 1.56. AVS scores 0.69 and allows 2.23. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 36% of CD Tondela's games and 38% of AVS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 62%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
CD Tondela has the higher season xG average, 1.17 to 1.14 per game. CD Tondela takes 10.5 shots per game, while AVS takes 10.7.
First-half and second-half trends
CD Tondela leads at halftime in 12% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. AVS leads at halftime in 8% and scores 0.46 after halftime.
When the teams score
CD Tondela's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For AVS, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga Portugal games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CD Tondela holds a clear advantage as the home team in this clash between two bottom-table sides. Although Tondela occupies 17th place, their home record (8% wins) is decidedly better than AVS's away record, as they have not won any away matches this season (0% wins). AVS concedes an average of 2.83 goals per away match, which is an alarming figure, while Tondela has scored an average of 0.69 goals at home. The form of both teams over the last 5 matches is similar (Tondela 1.2 PPG vs AVS 1.0 PPG), but the home advantage and AVS's catastrophic away statistics (goal difference -26) speak in favor of the hosts. The expected goals (xG) outcome also favors Tondela (1.22 vs 1.06), suggesting their greater offensive efficiency in home matches. The high percentage of draws for both teams (38% Tondela, 25% AVS) along with defensive issues for both sides mean that a draw also remains a realistic scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| CD Tondela | AVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
CD Tondela is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - CD Tondela · 1 pts / game - AVS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CD Tondela is 10% better for: goals scored per game.
0.76 goals / game - CD Tondela · 0.69 goals / game - AVS
CD Tondela is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.56 goals / game - CD Tondela · 2.23 goals / game - AVS
CD Tondela scores in 44% of games (11 of 25 meczów), while AVS keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 meczów).
AVS scores in 42% of games (11 of 26 meczów), while CD Tondela keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CD Tondela
Over / Under - AVS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CD Tondela is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.92 pts / game - CD Tondela · 0.62 pts / game - AVS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CD Tondela - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 16%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
AVS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 4%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
CD Tondela
AVS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga Portugal).
Teams vs league
| CD Tondela | Liga | AVS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.32 | 2.70 | ▲ 2.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 46% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 55% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 30% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 70% | • 69% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 79% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from CD Tondela's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against AVS. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of CD Tondela vs AVS?
The Liga NOS match finished CD Tondela 0:0 AVS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CD Tondela vs AVS?
CD Tondela score 0.76 goals per game on average and AVS 0.69. The Liga NOS average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 36% of CD Tondela's matches and 38% of AVS's.
What form are CD Tondela and AVS in?
Over the last 5 games CD Tondela have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and AVS 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Tondela vs AVS?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


