CD Tondela vs Porto: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Tondela play Porto in Liga NOS (Portugal). The match date is 7 December 2025 at 21:30. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

CD Tondela: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Porto: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Tondela scores 0.79 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Porto scores 1.94 and concedes 0.53. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Tondela 35%, Porto 38%. Over 2.5: CD Tondela 50%, Porto 56%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Porto has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.17. CD Tondela: 10.6 shots per match, Porto: 14.5.

Match halves

CD Tondela: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.50. Porto: half-time lead 59%, second-half goals 1.09.

Goals by minute

CD Tondela: 0-15 (6 goals). Porto: 46-60 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga Portugal: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

26Possession (%)74
CD TondelaPorto
11Shots11
CD TondelaPorto
2Shots on target6
CD TondelaPorto
1.01xG1.51
CD TondelaPorto
2Corners4
CD TondelaPorto
25Dangerous attacks53
CD TondelaPorto
9Fouls10
CD TondelaPorto
2Cards1
CD TondelaPorto

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.79Goals scored / match1.94
CD TondelaPorto
1.62Goals conceded / match0.53
CD TondelaPorto
44%Average possession55%
CD TondelaPorto
3.41Shots on target / match5.29
CD TondelaPorto

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.59Shots per match14.47
CD TondelaPorto
3.41Shots on target5.29
CD TondelaPorto
7.5%Shot conversion13.4%
CD TondelaPorto
44%Possession55%
CD TondelaPorto
1.17xG for1.66
CD TondelaPorto
1.55xG against1
CD TondelaPorto

Shooting quality

CD Tondela: BalancedPorto: Dominant
CD TondelaPorto
Accuracy (shots on target)32%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Porto is 71% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - CD Tondela · 2.4 pts / match - Porto

CD Tondela
LDWWL
Season result split
18% W29% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-10-18
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-7-8
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Porto
WWWLW
Season result split
82% W12% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
28-4-2
2.59 pts / match · goal difference +48
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
14-1-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Porto is 146% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - CD Tondela · 1.94 goals / match - Porto

Porto is 206% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - CD Tondela · 0.53 goals / match - Porto

CD Tondela scoring profile: more difficult

CD Tondela scores in 47% of matches (16 of 34 matches), while Porto keeps a clean sheet in 62% (21 of 34 matches).

Porto scoring profile: very strong

Porto scores in 97% of matches (33 of 34 matches), while CD Tondela keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).

27Goals scored (season)66
CD TondelaPorto
55Goals conceded (season)18
CD TondelaPorto
2.41Average goals in match2.47
CD TondelaPorto
6Goals scored (last 5)7
CD TondelaPorto
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
CD TondelaPorto

How often they score at least...

47%1 goal97%
CD TondelaPorto
29%2 goals62%
CD TondelaPorto
3%3 goals29%
CD TondelaPorto
0%4 goals6%
CD TondelaPorto

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal38%
CD TondelaPorto
53%2 goals12%
CD TondelaPorto
24%3 goals3%
CD TondelaPorto
3%4 goals0%
CD TondelaPorto

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time3%
CD TondelaPorto
9%BTTS in both halves0%
CD TondelaPorto
18%Scored in both halves41%
CD TondelaPorto

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
CD TondelaPorto
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
CD TondelaPorto
40%BTTS - last 540%
CD TondelaPorto

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
CD TondelaPorto
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
CD TondelaPorto
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
CD TondelaPorto

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
CD TondelaPorto
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
CD TondelaPorto
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
CD TondelaPorto

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Porto is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / match - CD Tondela · 2.12 pts / match - Porto

CD Tondela - half-time state
12% leading56% draw32% trailing
Porto - half-time state
59% leading35% draw6% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per match (1st half)2.12
CD TondelaPorto
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.85
CD TondelaPorto
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.12
CD TondelaPorto
0.94Average goals (1st half)0.97
CD TondelaPorto
53%Clean sheet before half-time91%
CD TondelaPorto
76%No goal before half-time38%
CD TondelaPorto

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)2.12
CD TondelaPorto
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.09
CD TondelaPorto
0.97Goals conceded (2nd half)0.41
CD TondelaPorto
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.5
CD TondelaPorto
35%Clean sheet after half-time68%
CD TondelaPorto
59%No goal after half-time24%
CD TondelaPorto

CD Tondela - second-half results

21% W32% R47% P
31
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Porto - second-half results

62% W26% R12% P
72
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+25
Goal difference (1st half)
72
Second-half points
+23
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at half-time in 59% of matches and wins 82%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Tondela - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Porto - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Tondela
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
2
9
16-30
2
9
31-45
6
6
46-60
6
12
61-75
5
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

Porto
ScoredConceded
9
1
0-15
8
2
16-30
12
1
31-45
13
5
46-60
12
3
61-75
12
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Tondela

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Porto

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
163%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
35%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga Portugal).

Teams vs league

CD TondelaLigaPorto
Average goals in match 2.412.68 2.47
Both teams scored 35%48% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%54% 56%
Clean sheets 21%29% 62%
Goal before half-time 56%69% 68%
Goal after half-time 79%80% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CD Tondela 0 - 0 - 1 Porto. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CD Tondela vs Porto?

The Liga NOS match finished CD Tondela 0:2 Porto. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Tondela vs Porto?

CD Tondela score 0.79 goals per game on average and Porto 1.94. The Liga NOS average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 35% of CD Tondela's matches and 38% of Porto's.

What form are CD Tondela and Porto in?

Over the last 5 games CD Tondela have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Porto 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Tondela vs Porto?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.