CD Trofense vs CD Mafra: match statistics
CD Mafra demonstrates clearly superior form and statistics this season. The visitors hold a record of 10 wins with only 3 losses, while the hosts have won just 7 matches and lost 6. Trofense's form in the last five matches is very poor with merely 0.4 points per match and a five-game winless streak, whereas Mafra averages 1.6 points per match in their last five outings. Trofense has an alarming 50% loss rate at home and fails to score in 40% of matches at their own stadium. Although Mafra has a negative goal difference away (-2) and only a 30% win rate, their overall quality and form surpass the hosts. Considering all factors, a draw is also a realistic scenario due to Mafra's high away draw rate (40%), yet I slightly favor an away victory.
CD Trofense vs CD Mafra: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
CD Trofense played against CD Mafra in Liga 3 (Portugal). The game was played on February 27, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
CD Trofense has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. CD Mafra has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
CD Trofense scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 0.90. CD Mafra scores 1.45 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.17 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of CD Trofense's games and 60% of CD Mafra's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 40%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 37% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
CD Mafra has the higher season xG average, 1.38 to 1.20 per game. CD Trofense takes 8.1 shots per game, while CD Mafra takes 9.9.
First-half and second-half trends
CD Trofense leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.52 goals per game after halftime. CD Mafra leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.90 after halftime.
When the teams score
CD Trofense's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For CD Mafra, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 3 games average 2.17 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 37% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CD Mafra demonstrates clearly superior form and statistics this season. The visitors hold a record of 10 wins with only 3 losses, while the hosts have won just 7 matches and lost 6. Trofense's form in the last five matches is very poor with merely 0.4 points per match and a five-game winless streak, whereas Mafra averages 1.6 points per match in their last five outings. Trofense has an alarming 50% loss rate at home and fails to score in 40% of matches at their own stadium. Although Mafra has a negative goal difference away (-2) and only a 30% win rate, their overall quality and form surpass the hosts. Considering all factors, a draw is also a realistic scenario due to Mafra's high away draw rate (40%), yet I slightly favor an away victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| CD Trofense | CD Mafra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
CD Mafra is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - CD Trofense · 1.6 pts / game - CD Mafra
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CD Mafra is 27% better for: goals scored per game.
1.14 goals / game - CD Trofense · 1.45 goals / game - CD Mafra
CD Trofense is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.9 goals / game - CD Trofense · 1 goals / game - CD Mafra
CD Trofense scores in 62% of games (13 of 21 meczów), while CD Mafra keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 meczów).
CD Mafra scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CD Trofense
Over / Under - CD Mafra
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CD Mafra is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / game - CD Trofense · 1.5 pts / game - CD Mafra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CD Trofense - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
CD Mafra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
CD Trofense
CD Mafra
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).
Teams vs league
| CD Trofense | Liga | CD Mafra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.05 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.45 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 46% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 37% | ▲ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 33% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 64% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of CD Trofense vs CD Mafra?
The Liga 3 match finished CD Trofense 1:1 CD Mafra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CD Trofense vs CD Mafra?
CD Trofense score 1.14 goals per game on average and CD Mafra 1.45. The Liga 3 average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 52% of CD Trofense's matches and 60% of CD Mafra's.
What form are CD Trofense and CD Mafra in?
Over the last 5 games CD Trofense have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and CD Mafra 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Trofense vs CD Mafra?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.