Portugal - Liga 3Estádio do Clube Desportivo TrofenseData current as of October 23, 2026

CD Trofense vs Leça: match statistics

CD Trofense crest
CD Trofense
1 : 4half-time 1:3
Leça crest
Leça

CD Trofense vs Leça: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

CD Trofense played against Leça in Liga 3 (Portugal). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Estádio do Clube Desportivo Trofense. Final score: 1:4.

Recent form

CD Trofense has 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Leça has 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

CD Trofense scores 0.25 goals per game and allows 0.75. Leça scores 0.75 and allows 1.75. Games in this league average 2.36 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 0% of CD Trofense's games and 50% of Leça's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 50%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Leça has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 0.88 per game. CD Trofense takes 7.0 shots per game, while Leça takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

CD Trofense leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Leça leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

CD Trofense's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (1 goals). For Leça, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 3 games average 2.36 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CD Trofense have a slight home advantage: in their matches on home soil so far, they have averaged 0.5 goals scored and conceded just 0.5, keeping a clean sheet in 50% of games. Leça do average 1.0 goals away from home, but they also concede 1.5, and have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away match. The visitors create more offensively, averaging 10 shots and 4.5 shots on target per game compared with Trofense’s 7.5 and 1.5, respectively, but their defense allows opponents a high xG of 2.26. The hosts are also in poor recent form, conceding 8 goals in their last five matches, but Leça have conceded the same 8 goals over that period and have won just 1 of their last five games. Given both teams’ low scoring efficiency and Trofense’s stronger defensive numbers at home, a narrow home win is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The scenario in which one of the teams fails to score has a slight edge, primarily due to Trofense’s poor finishing: the hosts have averaged just 0.4 goals over their last 5 matches, while both teams scored in only 20% of those games. Leça presents a more promising attacking profile, with a recent BTTS rate of 60% and an average xG of 1.58 over five matches, compared with 0.88 for Trofense. The hosts can still find the net, having produced a seasonal xG of 1.79, while Leça’s defense has allowed opponents an average of 2.26 xG and has not kept a single clean sheet. Nevertheless, Trofense has converted only 4% of its shots into goals, averaging 0.5 goals scored this season, which significantly increases the risk that they will fail to capitalize on their creative advantage. Additionally, the league’s BTTS rate stands at just 43%, so the “No” pick is marginally stronger than the Goal/Goal option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to a moderate number of goals: the hosts score an average of 0.5 goals, while the visitors score 1.0, despite both defenses conceding 2.0 and 1.5 goals per match, respectively. In their last five appearances, Trofense scored just 0.4 goals per game, while Leça scored 0.8, with both teams conceding an average of 1.6 goals. The hosts’ attacking potential is boosted by an xG of 1.79 and 6.5 shots on target per match, but their conversion rate is only 4%, while their current xG over the last five matches stands at just 0.88. The 3.5 line is further supported by the fact that none of the matches played by either team so far has produced more than 3 goals, while the league-wide average is 2.33 goals. The strongest pick is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the projected 2.34 goals leaves a clear margin below four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Leça have a clearly stronger first-half profile: they score an average of 1.0 goal before the break, while Trofense have yet to score any, and the hosts have been trailing at half-time in 100% of their matches so far. The visitors were leading after 45 minutes in 50% of their games and had not been losing at that stage in any of them, whereas Trofense conceded an average of 1.0 goal before the break. In their last five matches, Leça have also taken the lead at half-time more often—40% compared with 0% for the hosts—while Trofense scored just 0.2 goals in the first halves. Over the full match, the visitors average 1.5 points per game compared with Trofense’s 0.5, and score 1.0 goal per match versus just 0.5 for the hosts. Although Trofense’s xG stands at 1.79 compared with Leça’s 1.21, the hosts convert only 4% of their shots and concede an average of 2.0 goals. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT scenario remains a lead at the break followed by a win for the visitors.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 3
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

37Possession (%)63
CD TrofenseLeça
5Shots14
CD TrofenseLeça
3Shots on target9
CD TrofenseLeça
0.78xG1.82
CD TrofenseLeça
2Corners6
CD TrofenseLeça
34Dangerous attacks42
CD TrofenseLeça
21Fouls14
CD TrofenseLeça
3Cards1
CD TrofenseLeça

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.25Goals scored / game0.75
CD TrofenseLeça
0.75Goals allowed / game1.75
CD TrofenseLeça
44%Average possession50%
CD TrofenseLeça
1.25Shots on target / game5.5
CD TrofenseLeça

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7Shots per game12
CD TrofenseLeça
1.25Shots on target5.5
CD TrofenseLeça
3.6%Shot conversion6.3%
CD TrofenseLeça
44%Possession50%
CD TrofenseLeça
0.88xG for1.5
CD TrofenseLeça
1.63xG against1.58
CD TrofenseLeça

Shooting quality

CD Trofense: BalancedLeça: Balanced
CD TrofenseLeça
Accuracy (shots on target)18%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.14

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

CD Trofense
LLWD
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Leça
DLWL
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Leça is 200% better for: goals scored per game.

0.25 goals / game - CD Trofense · 0.75 goals / game - Leça

CD Trofense is 133% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.75 goals / game - CD Trofense · 1.75 goals / game - Leça

CD Trofense scoring profile: strong

CD Trofense scores in 25% of games (1 of 4 games), while Leça keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).

Leça scoring profile: mixed

Leça scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 games), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 games).

1Goals scored (season)3
CD TrofenseLeça
3Goals conceded (season)7
CD TrofenseLeça
1Average goals per game2.5
CD TrofenseLeça
1Goals scored (last 5)3
CD TrofenseLeça
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
CD TrofenseLeça

How often they score at least...

25%1 goal50%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%2 goals25%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%3 goals0%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%4 goals0%
CD TrofenseLeça

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
CD TrofenseLeça
25%2 goals50%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%3 goals25%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%4 goals0%
CD TrofenseLeça

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time25%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%Scored in both halves0%
CD TrofenseLeça

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%BTTS - last 550%
CD TrofenseLeça

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
CD TrofenseLeça

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
CD TrofenseLeça
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
CD TrofenseLeça

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Leça is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / game - CD Trofense · 1 pts / game - Leça

CD Trofense - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Leça - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per game (1st half)1
CD TrofenseLeça
0Goals scored (1st half)0.5
CD TrofenseLeça
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
CD TrofenseLeça
0.5Average goals (1st half)1.25
CD TrofenseLeça
50%Clean sheet before half-time25%
CD TrofenseLeça
100%No goal before half-time75%
CD TrofenseLeça

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)1
CD TrofenseLeça
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
CD TrofenseLeça
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)1
CD TrofenseLeça
0.5Average goals (2nd half)1.25
CD TrofenseLeça
75%Clean sheet after half-time50%
CD TrofenseLeça
75%No goal after half-time75%
CD TrofenseLeça

CD Trofense - second-half results

25% W50% D25% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Leça - second-half results

25% W25% D50% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

CD Trofense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.501.25
Goals scored / game0.00.3
Goals allowed / game0.50.3
Average goals per game0.50.5
1 goal50%50%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%75%
No goal100%75%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Leça - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.50.3
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.31.3
1 goal75%75%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal75%75%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Leça
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
74%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
13%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
38%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.88
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
20%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

Leça

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.92
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.75
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD TrofenseLigaLeça
Average goals per game▼ 1.002.36▲ 2.50
Both teams scored▼ 0%45%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%45%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%35%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%64%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%67%▲ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.36
Average goals per game
45%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / game
1.10
Away goals / game
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CD TrofenseYellow cardFeliz Edgar Neto Vaz
  2. CD TrofenseGoalJefer Gunjo
  3. CD TrofenseYellow cardJefer Gunjo
  4. CD TrofenseYellow cardLuis Miguel Borges de Paula

FAQ

What was the result of CD Trofense vs Leça?

The Liga 3 match finished CD Trofense 1:4 Leça. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Trofense vs Leça?

CD Trofense score 0.25 goals per game on average and Leça 0.75. The Liga 3 average is 2.36 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 0% of CD Trofense's matches and 50% of Leça's.

What form are CD Trofense and Leça in?

Over the last 5 games CD Trofense have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Leça 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Trofense vs Leça?

The statistical background for CD Trofense vs Leça — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.