Mexico - Ascenso MXData current as of 23 July 2026

CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT: match statistics

165%(1.36)
X22%(4.33)
213%(6.50)

CDS Tampico Madero demonstrates a clear advantage in home matches with an impressive win rate of 77% and a positive goal difference of +12. The hosts score an average of 1.85 goals per home game, while conceding only 0.92 goals, which indicates a solid defense. Correcaminos UAT performs significantly worse on the road, winning only 18% of matches and conceding an average of 2.09 goals per game, with a negative goal difference of -13. The difference in quality of play, offensive and defensive efficiency, and the home advantage clearly point to their victory. Although the visitors have shown improved form in their last five matches, their poor away results and xG statistics (0.96 vs 2.03) provide no grounds for optimism when facing such a strong opponent at home.

CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CDS Tampico Madero play Correcaminos UAT in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match date is 19 March 2026 at 03:00. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

CDS Tampico Madero: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Correcaminos UAT: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

CDS Tampico Madero scores 1.38 and concedes 0.98 goals per match. Correcaminos UAT scores 1.07 and concedes 2.21. League average: 2.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CDS Tampico Madero 57%, Correcaminos UAT 71%. Over 2.5: CDS Tampico Madero 43%, Correcaminos UAT 68%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

CDS Tampico Madero has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.15. CDS Tampico Madero: 11.6 shots per match, Correcaminos UAT: 9.1.

Match halves

CDS Tampico Madero: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.79. Correcaminos UAT: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

CDS Tampico Madero: 46-60 (15 goals). Correcaminos UAT: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ascenso MX: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

CDS Tampico Madero demonstrates a clear advantage in home matches with an impressive win rate of 77% and a positive goal difference of +12. The hosts score an average of 1.85 goals per home game, while conceding only 0.92 goals, which indicates a solid defense. Correcaminos UAT performs significantly worse on the road, winning only 18% of matches and conceding an average of 2.09 goals per game, with a negative goal difference of -13. The difference in quality of play, offensive and defensive efficiency, and the home advantage clearly point to their victory. Although the visitors have shown improved form in their last five matches, their poor away results and xG statistics (0.96 vs 2.03) provide no grounds for optimism when facing such a strong opponent at home.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
12Shots10
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
6Shots on target3
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
1.52xG1.06
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
8Corners2
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
47Dangerous attacks29
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
9Fouls11
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
1Cards4
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
1.38Goals scored / match1.07
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
0.98Goals conceded / match2.21
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
52%Average possession43%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
3.88Shots on target / match3.14
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.64Shots per match9.11
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
3.88Shots on target3.14
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
11.9%Shot conversion11.8%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
52%Possession43%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
1.32xG for1.15
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
1.34xG against1.79
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

Shooting quality

CDS Tampico Madero: BalancedCorrecaminos UAT: Balanced
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CDS Tampico Madero
DDLLW
Season result split
52% W29% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
22-12-8
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
15-4-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.94Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Correcaminos UAT
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
18% W25% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-16
0.79 pts / match · goal difference -32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-8
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CDS Tampico Madero is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero · 1.07 goals / match - Correcaminos UAT

CDS Tampico Madero is 126% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.98 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero · 2.21 goals / match - Correcaminos UAT

CDS Tampico Madero scoring profile: very strong

CDS Tampico Madero scores in 76% of matches (32 of 42 matches), while Correcaminos UAT keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 matches).

Correcaminos UAT scoring profile: very strong

Correcaminos UAT scores in 82% of matches (23 of 28 matches), while CDS Tampico Madero keeps a clean sheet in 31% (13 of 42 matches).

58Goals scored (season)30
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
41Goals conceded (season)62
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
2.36Average goals in match3.29
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
6Goals scored (last 5)5
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
7Goals conceded (last 5)14
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal82%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
40%2 goals21%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
17%3 goals4%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
5%4 goals0%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal86%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
19%2 goals64%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
7%3 goals39%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
2%4 goals18%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
CDS Tampico Madero - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.24 of 42 matches
71%
Correcaminos UAT - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.20 of 28 matches
57%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time25%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
5%BTTS in both halves4%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
31%Scored in both halves7%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
60%BTTS - last 5100%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CDS Tampico Madero is 178% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - CDS Tampico Madero · 0.54 pts / match - Correcaminos UAT

CDS Tampico Madero - half-time state
36% leading43% draw21% trailing
Correcaminos UAT - half-time state
7% leading32% draw61% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)0.54
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.36
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)1.14
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
1Average goals (1st half)1.5
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
60%Clean sheet before half-time25%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
52%No goal before half-time68%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

After half-time (2nd half)

1.62Points per match (2nd half)1.11
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)1.07
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.79
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
57%Clean sheet after half-time29%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT
40%No goal after half-time43%
CDS Tampico MaderoCorrecaminos UAT

CDS Tampico Madero - second-half results

43% W33% R24% P
63
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
68
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Correcaminos UAT - second-half results

29% W25% R46% P
15
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-22
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding257%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CDS Tampico Madero - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Correcaminos UAT - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.41.4
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CDS Tampico Madero
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
13
5
16-30
8
7
31-45
15
7
46-60
5
6
61-75
13
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Correcaminos UAT
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
2
7
16-30
2
16
31-45
6
7
46-60
4
6
61-75
10
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CDS Tampico Madero

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Correcaminos UAT

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).

Teams vs league

CDS Tampico MaderoLigaCorrecaminos UAT
Average goals in match 2.362.85 3.29
Both teams scored 57%57% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%53% 68%
Clean sheets 31%25% 14%
Goal before half-time 69%74% 82%
Goal after half-time 76%80% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+53%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CDS Tampico Madero 1 - 0 - 0 Correcaminos UAT. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Correcaminos UAT
1 : 2
Club Deportivo y Social Tampico Madero

FAQ

What was the result of CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT?

The Ascenso MX match finished CDS Tampico Madero 3:1 Correcaminos UAT. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT?

CDS Tampico Madero score 1.38 goals per game on average and Correcaminos UAT 1.07. The Ascenso MX average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 57% of CDS Tampico Madero's matches and 71% of Correcaminos UAT's.

What form are CDS Tampico Madero and Correcaminos UAT in?

Over the last 5 games CDS Tampico Madero have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Correcaminos UAT 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.