Romania - Liga IIData current as of September 08, 2026

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ vs ACS Gloria Bistrita: match statistics

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ vs ACS Gloria Bistrita: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ played against ACS Gloria Bistrita in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Recent form

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. ACS Gloria Bistrita has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ scores 0.91 goals per game and allows 2.09. ACS Gloria Bistrita scores 1.36 and allows 1.41. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 41% of Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ's games and 59% of ACS Gloria Bistrita's. The Over 2.5 rates are 59% and 59%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

ACS Gloria Bistrita has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.21 per game. Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ takes 10.1 shots per game, while ACS Gloria Bistrita takes 11.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. ACS Gloria Bistrita leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.68 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For ACS Gloria Bistrita, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga II games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I forecast an away win (2): ACS Gloria Bistrita have scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches and hold a record of 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses in that period (averaging 1.4 pts per game), whereas Ceahlăul have scored only 3 goals and lost all of their last 5 fixtures (0 pts). This season the visitors have 30 goals scored versus 20 for the hosts and have conceded 31 compared to Ceahlăul’s 46, i.e. an offensive advantage of +10 goals and a 15-goal better defensive record for Gloria. Quality-of-chance metrics are similar: average home xG for the hosts is 1.38 versus away xG for the visitors of 1.39, and average xG against 1.67 vs 1.68, showing comparable chance-creation potential, but the visitors convert that into results more effectively. The hosts take slightly more shots at home (11.5 vs 10.18) and have more shots on target (4.4 vs 3.82) and a higher home clean sheet rate (40% vs 9% for the visitors), yet conceding 14 goals in the last 5 matches and earning 0 points indicates a severe defensive crisis. Considering form, recent results advantage and the goal-difference gap, I give the visitors a 60% chance, a draw 25% and the hosts 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project BTTS - Yes at 75% probability because both teams show strong BTTS indicators: Ceahlăul 55% for the season and 60% in the last 5 matches, while ACS Gloria 64% for the season and 80% in the last 5. Both sides consistently concede — Ceahlăul has conceded 46 goals this season and 14 in the last 5 (avg 2.8 per match), Gloria 31 this season and 7 in the last 5 (1.4 per match), which favors a scenario where both teams score. Season xG shows Ceahlăul generates 1.62 xG per match and Gloria 1.39 xG; in the last 5 Gloria has xG_for 1.78 and has averaged 1.8 goals, while Ceahlăul only 0.74 xG and 0.6 goals — indicating the visitors are in attacking form and the hosts are prone to conceding. Additionally, clean sheet rates are low (27% for hosts and only 9% for guests), and matches over 2.5 goals occur frequently (55% and 64%), further increasing the likelihood that both teams will find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I calculate expected goals: Ceahlăul 1.65 and Gloria 1.24 (total 2.89), computed as the home attack xG average 1.62 and away conceded xG 1.68 for Ceahlăul, and the away attack xG average 1.39 and home conceded xG 1.08 for Gloria. Season-long metrics confirm a propensity for goals – Ceahlăul scores on average 1.73 goals and has 73% of matches over 1.5 goals, while Gloria scores 1.00 and has 91% of matches over 1.5; Over 2.5 occurred in 55% of Ceahlăul’s matches and 64% of Gloria’s matches this season. In the last 5 fixtures Ceahlăul scored 3 and conceded 14 (0.6 scored and 2.8 conceded per game), and Gloria scored 9 and conceded 7 (1.8 and 1.4), indicating home vulnerability to conceding and a tendency toward higher-scoring games. Based on the expected total of 2.89 I estimate approximately a 78% probability of Over 1.5 goals, ~55% for Over 2.5, and ~33% for Over 3.5; additionally, Over 2.5 occurred in 80% of the home team’s last 5 matches and 60% of the away team’s, which strengthens the signal. Therefore the most certain and strongest pick from the data is Over 1.5 (line 1.5, side: over).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is the home team leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1): the home side led at the break in 45% of matches, while the visitors did so in only 9%. In the first half the home team average 0.73 goals scored and 0.36 conceded and keep 64% clean halves (scoredAVGHT_home=0.73, concededAVGHT_home=0.36, seasonCSPercentageHT_home=64.0), whereas the away team average 0.64 scored and 1.09 conceded, which gives a clear home advantage at the break. Over the full match the home team average 1.73 scored and 1.09 conceded, with a win rate of 45% versus 18% for the visitors, so conversion of a lead into a win is realistic. Additionally the home side generate more xG and chances (xG 1.62 versus 1.39 for the away team, on average 4.91 shots on target vs 3.82 and a conversion rate of 13% vs 10%), supporting maintenance of the lead after half-time. Caution is warranted due to form: the home team have five defeats in their last five matches (form_l5_home='lllll', last5_winPercentage_overall_home=0.0), while the visitors have a 40% win rate in their last five, therefore I assign a 40% probability to 1/1 and lower shares to other scenarios such as X/1 (20%) or X/X (14%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

37Possession (%)63
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
9Shots26
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
2Shots on target14
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
1xG3.26
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
2Corners6
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
39Dangerous attacks88
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
8Fouls16
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
0Cards0
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
0.91Goals scored / game1.36
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
2.09Goals allowed / game1.41
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
45%Average possession47%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
3.32Shots on target / game4.36
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.05Shots per game11.82
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
3.32Shots on target4.36
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
9%Shot conversion11.5%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
45%Possession47%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
1.21xG for1.51
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
1.88xG against1.36
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

Shooting quality

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ: BalancedACS Gloria Bistrita: Balanced
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
Accuracy (shots on target)33%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
23% W14% R64% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-14
0.82 pts / game · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-5
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WWLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 0.73Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
ACS Gloria Bistrita
WDWWL
Season result split
32% W23% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-10
1.18 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ACS Gloria Bistrita is 49% better for: goals scored per game.

0.91 goals / game - Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ · 1.36 goals / game - ACS Gloria Bistrita

ACS Gloria Bistrita is 48% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.09 goals / game - Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ · 1.41 goals / game - ACS Gloria Bistrita

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ scoring profile: very strong

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ scores in 64% of games (14 of 22 meczów), while ACS Gloria Bistrita keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 meczów).

ACS Gloria Bistrita scoring profile: very strong

ACS Gloria Bistrita scores in 73% of games (16 of 22 meczów), while Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 meczów).

20Goals scored (season)30
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
46Goals conceded (season)31
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
3Average goals per game2.77
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
3Goals scored (last 5)9
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
14Goals conceded (last 5)4
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal73%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
18%2 goals32%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
9%3 goals14%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
0%4 goals9%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal82%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
59%2 goals41%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
36%3 goals18%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
14%4 goals0%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

41%
Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 22 meczów
59%
ACS Gloria Bistrita - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 22 meczów
49%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time36%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
14%Scored in both halves27%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
60%BTTS - last 560%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ACS Gloria Bistrita is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.95 pts / game - Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ · 1.27 pts / game - ACS Gloria Bistrita

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ - half-time state
23% leading27% draw50% trailing
ACS Gloria Bistrita - half-time state
27% leading45% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.95Points per game (1st half)1.27
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.68
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
0.82Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.41
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
45%Clean sheet before half-time41%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
73%No goal before half-time45%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per game (2nd half)1.27
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
1.27Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
1.86Average goals (2nd half)1.36
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
32%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita
50%No goal after half-time55%
Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţACS Gloria Bistrita

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ - second-half results

32% W9% R59% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

ACS Gloria Bistrita - second-half results

36% W18% R45% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.60
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game1.41.4
Average goals per game1.61.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-6-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
ACS Gloria Bistrita - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.202.00
Goals scored / game1.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
9
31-45
2
7
46-60
4
11
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

ACS Gloria Bistrita
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
7
16-30
7
5
31-45
6
4
46-60
5
3
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.67
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
188%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

ACS Gloria Bistrita

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţLigaACS Gloria Bistrita
Average goals per game 3.002.72 2.77
Both teams scored 41%49% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%50% 59%
Clean sheets 27%29% 18%
Goal before half-time 77%74% 77%
Goal after half-time 95%81% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / game
1.11
Away goals / game
+45%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ACS Gloria BistritaGoalAlexandro Mogos
  2. ACS Gloria BistritaGoalGoodnews Ibuchi Chukwu Jr.
  3. ACS Gloria BistritaGoalJimmy King Otega

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against ACS Gloria Bistrita. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ vs ACS Gloria Bistrita?

The Liga II match finished Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ 0:3 ACS Gloria Bistrita. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ vs ACS Gloria Bistrita?

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ score 0.91 goals per game on average and ACS Gloria Bistrita 1.36. The Liga II average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ's matches and 59% of ACS Gloria Bistrita's.

What form are Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ and ACS Gloria Bistrita in?

Over the last 5 games Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and ACS Gloria Bistrita 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ vs ACS Gloria Bistrita?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ vs ACS Gloria Bistrita: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.