Central Español vs Racing: match statistics
Central Español vs Racing: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Central Español played against Racing in Primera División (Uruguay). The game was played on June 6, 2026. Venue: Parque Luis Méndez Piana. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Central Español has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Racing has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Central Español scores 1.44 goals per game and allows 1.33. Racing scores 1.33 and allows 0.78. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Central Español's games and 50% of Racing's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 33%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Racing has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.27 per game. Central Español takes 9.8 shots per game, while Racing takes 13.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Central Español leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.89 goals per game after halftime. Racing leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Central Español's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For Racing, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Primera División games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1) — Central Español has superior recent attacking form, scoring 6 goals in their last 5 matches versus Racing’s 2 in the same period. At home Central averages 1.75 goals per game, records 4.38 shots on target and 8.63 attempts, with a conversion rate of 20%, while Racing away averages 1.25 goals, 3.75 shots on target and as many as 12.75 attempts with a 10% conversion. Racing defends better on the road — conceding only 0.75 goals per match and posting an average xG against of 1.21 versus 1.47 xG against for Central at home, and they keep a clean sheet in 38% of away fixtures. Possession differences (49% Racing vs 39% Central) and Racing’s higher shot volume indicate better game control, but this does not translate into goals due to the visitors’ low finishing. Considering the higher conversion rate and lower share of goalless matches for the home side (13% vs 25%), I give the edge to Central.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are neutral: Central Español has BTTS 50% and Racing 50%, against a league average of 52%, providing a draw-like baseline. Short-term form, however, favors No Goal — Racing scored only 2 goals in their last 5 matches (0.4 per match) and had BTTS in 20%, while Central scored 6 in their last 5 (1.2 per match) and had BTTS in 40%. The home side also has 50% clean sheets this season, and the league overall has 54% clean sheets, increasing the likelihood that one side will fail to score; still xG shows moderate scoring potential (home xG 1.64 vs away xG 1.56) and average shot counts 13.6 vs 12.75. Considering Racing’s poor finishing in the last 5 and the high clean sheet rate for the hosts, I assess BTTS probability at roughly 38% for 'yes' and 62% for 'no', recommending a 'no' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on the home xG of 1.64 versus the away xG conceded of 1.21 I estimate about 1.43 goals for Central Español, and the away xG of 1.56 versus the home xG conceded of 1.04 gives about 1.30 goals for Racing — totaling ~2.73 goals. Both teams have a very high share of matches with at least one goal (Over 0.5: 90% and 88%) and a relatively high Over 1.5 rate (60% and 63%), which strongly supports the Over 1.5 line. Shot analysis confirms this direction: 13.6 shots for the home side and 12.75 for the away with a 10% conversion translate to ~1.36 and ~1.28 goals (total ~2.64), consistent with the xG estimate. At the same time, Racing’s last 5 matches show only 2 goals in 5 games (0.4 average) despite a last5 xG of 1.33, which reduces the likelihood of very high totals >3.5. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (approx. 62%), Over 2.5 is slightly favored (~54%), while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~17%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Central Español have the halftime advantage: they led at the break in 5 of their matches so far (50%) and score on average 0.8 goals by halftime versus Racing’s 0.5, which supports the hosts leading after 45 minutes. Additionally, the hosts’ xG is 1.64 compared to 1.56 for the visitors, and their average shots on target are 4.4 vs 3.75, increasing the chance of maintaining the lead. Although Racing have a higher season win rate (63% versus the hosts’ 50%), in the last 5 matches the hosts have won 60% of games versus 20% for the visitors, so recent form favors Central Español. The hosts have also scored 5 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 1 for the visitors in that interval, suggesting an ability to hold and extend a lead; therefore the most likely scenario is a halftime lead and a home win (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Central Español | Racing | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Central Español is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Central Español · 1.2 pts / game - Racing
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Central Español is 8% better for: goals scored per game.
1.44 goals / game - Central Español · 1.33 goals / game - Racing
Racing is 71% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - Central Español · 0.78 goals / game - Racing
Central Español scores in 83% of games (15 of 18 meczów), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 meczów).
Racing scores in 83% of games (15 of 18 meczów), while Central Español keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Central Español
Over / Under - Racing
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.11 pts / game - Central Español · 1.67 pts / game - Racing
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Central Español - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Racing - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Central Español
Racing
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Central Español | Liga | Racing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.78 | 2.45 | ▼ 2.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 51% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 47% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 27% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 69% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 74% | ▼ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Central Español's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Racing. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Central Español vs Racing?
The Primera División match finished Central Español 1:1 Racing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Central Español vs Racing?
Central Español score 1.44 goals per game on average and Racing 1.33. The Primera División average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Central Español's matches and 50% of Racing's.
What form are Central Español and Racing in?
Over the last 5 games Central Español have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Racing 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Central Español vs Racing?
The statistical background for Central Español vs Racing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.