Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ahly: match statistics

Ceramica Cleopatra crest
Ceramica Cleopatra
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Al Ahly crest
Al Ahly

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ahly: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ceramica Cleopatra play Al Ahly in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 7 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Ceramica Cleopatra: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Al Ahly: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.31 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Al Ahly scores 1.69 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ceramica Cleopatra 42%, Al Ahly 58%. Over 2.5: Ceramica Cleopatra 23%, Al Ahly 50%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Al Ahly has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.19. Ceramica Cleopatra: 9.8 shots per match, Al Ahly: 15.6.

Match halves

Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.77. Al Ahly: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (9 goals). Al Ahly: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Ceramica Cleopatra has a clear home advantage: they win 70% of matches at their stadium and score on average 1.8 goals while conceding 0.9 per game. Al Ahly create more chances on the road (16.4 average shots and xG 1.82 vs 12.1 shots and xG 1.4 for the hosts), but they have a lower conversion rate — 10% versus Ceramica’s 15%. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 4 goals and have a record of 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, while Al Ahly have scored 7 goals with 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses; both teams average 0.8 points from their last 5 games. Ceramica also keep 40% clean sheets at home versus Al Ahly’s 20% away and have a lower average goals conceded (0.9 vs 1.2), indicating greater defensive stability. Considering the higher home win rate, better shot efficiency and lower risk of conceding, I give Ceramica a 55% chance, 25% for a draw and 20% for an Al Ahly win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
5Shots24
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
2Shots on target4
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
0.66xG2.2
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
2Corners13
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
27Dangerous attacks58
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
17Fouls11
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
4Cards4
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
1.31Goals scored / match1.69
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
0.81Goals conceded / match0.92
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
57%Average possession61%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
3.81Shots on target / match4.96
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.81Shots per match15.62
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
3.81Shots on target4.96
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
13.3%Shot conversion10.8%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
57%Possession61%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
1.19xG for1.76
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
1.24xG against0.97
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

Shooting quality

Ceramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishingAl Ahly: Dominant
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
Accuracy (shots on target)39%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Ahly is 140% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 2.4 pts / match - Al Ahly

Ceramica Cleopatra
DWLDL
Season result split
46% W31% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-8-6
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-2
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Al Ahly
WLWWW
Season result split
58% W31% R12% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-3
2.04 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Ahly is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.69 goals / match - Al Ahly

Ceramica Cleopatra is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.81 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.92 goals / match - Al Ahly

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Al Ahly keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 matches).

Al Ahly scoring profile: very strong

Al Ahly scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

34Goals scored (season)44
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
21Goals conceded (season)24
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
2.12Average goals in match2.62
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
4Goals scored (last 5)10
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal85%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
42%2 goals50%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
12%3 goals27%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
0%4 goals8%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal65%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
15%2 goals23%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
4%3 goals4%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
0%4 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 26 matches
47%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time12%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
8%BTTS in both halves4%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
23%Scored in both halves38%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

BTTS and goal count

19%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
40%BTTS - last 520%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Ahly is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.85 pts / match - Al Ahly

Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
35% leading46% draw19% trailing
Al Ahly - half-time state
54% leading23% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.85
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.88
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
0.88Average goals (1st half)1.23
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
69%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
58%No goal before half-time38%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

After half-time (2nd half)

1.62Points per match (2nd half)1.69
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.38
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
58%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly
42%No goal after half-time38%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Ahly

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

42% W35% R23% P
39
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Ahly - second-half results

42% W42% R15% P
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding107%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Al Ahly - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.40
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+5+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Al Ahly
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
9
0
16-30
9
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
7
8
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.37
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Al Ahly

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.79
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
172%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Ceramica CleopatraLigaAl Ahly
Average goals in match 2.122.02 2.62
Both teams scored 42%47% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 23%34% 50%
Clean sheets 38%35% 35%
Goal before half-time 58%58% 85%
Goal after half-time 81%70% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ceramica Cleopatra 0 - 0 - 1 Al Ahly. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Al Ahly
1 : 0
Ceramica Cleopatra

FAQ

What was the result of Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ahly?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Ceramica Cleopatra 1:1 Al Ahly. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ahly?

Ceramica Cleopatra score 1.31 goals per game on average and Al Ahly 1.69. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 58% of Al Ahly's.

What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Al Ahly in?

Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Al Ahly 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ahly?

The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ahly — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.