Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola: match statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ceramica Cleopatra played against Coca-Cola in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on September 2, 2026. Venue: Cairo International Stadium. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Ceramica Cleopatra has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.50 points per game. Coca-Cola has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Ceramica Cleopatra scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.50. Coca-Cola scores 1.50 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.00 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Ceramica Cleopatra's games and 50% of Coca-Cola's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 0%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ceramica Cleopatra has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.48 per game. Ceramica Cleopatra takes 14.0 shots per game, while Coca-Cola takes 15.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Ceramica Cleopatra leads at halftime in 100% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Coca-Cola leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ceramica Cleopatra's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Coca-Cola, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 2.00 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Coca-Cola sit 6th, three places above Ceramica Cleopatra, and have averaged 1.2 points over their last five matches compared with the opponents’ 0.8. However, the hosts have a clear edge in chance creation at home, recording 1.53 xG and 5 shots on target per game, while the visitors average 1.32 xG and 3 shots on target away from home. Ceramica Cleopatra lost their only home match so far, conceding 2 goals despite allowing just 0.75 xG, which suggests problems with defensive execution. Coca-Cola are still unbeaten in the league, while their only away match ended in a draw, with an average of 1 goal scored and 1 conceded. Both teams have scored in every match played in their respective conditions, but Coca-Cola’s run of three draws in their last five appearances strengthens the case for a share of the points.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for goals from both sides is supported by current form: in their last 5 matches, both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of games, scored an average of 1.0 goal and conceded 1.2 and 1.0 goals respectively. Coca-Cola have failed to keep a clean sheet in any match this season, while Ceramica Cleopatra score an average of 2.0 goals at home from 17 shots and 4 shots on target per game. The visitors have solid grounds for finding the net, as their latest xG stands at 1.55, while the hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.03. On the other hand, the hosts have kept clean sheets in all their home games, which clearly reduces confidence in the pick; however, the attacking potential of both teams gives a slight lean towards BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Ceramica Cleopatra have greater attacking potential: they average 1.64 xG and 17 shots per match, compared with Coca-Cola’s 1.32 xG and 13 attempts. At the same time, the last five matches for both teams produced an average of just 1.0 goal scored per game, while the Over 2.5 goals rate was only 40% for the hosts and 20% for the visitors. In the current data, all matches involving both teams finished Under 2.5 and Under 3.5 goals, indicating limited risk of an open, high-scoring game. Coca-Cola concede an average of 1.0 goal, while Ceramica have allowed opponents just 1.03 xG in their last five appearances, making it difficult to project a high goal tally for the visitors. The 2.45-goal forecast leaves room for a 1:1 or 2:1 result, but clearly favors the Under 3.5 goals bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Ceramica Cleopatra win, i.e. the X/1 HT/FT outcome. In the current data for both teams, each had drawn at half-time in 100% of matches, with neither scoring nor conceding before the break. In their last five matches, Coca-Cola had not led at the break on any occasion, averaging 0.0 goals in the first half, while Ceramica averaged 0.6 goals and led in 40% of cases. After the interval, the hosts had won every second half in the current-season data, scoring an average of 2.0 goals and conceding none, while Coca-Cola conceded an average of 1.0 goal. Ceramica's quality advantage is also reflected in the xG figures: 1.64 in attack compared with the visitors' 1.32, while Coca-Cola allowed 1.50 xG.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Coca-Cola | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Coca-Cola is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.5 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 2 pts / game - Coca-Cola
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.5 goals / game - Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola is 200% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.5 goals / game - Coca-Cola
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while Coca-Cola keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 games).
Coca-Cola scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
Over / Under - Coca-Cola
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
3 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1 pts / game - Coca-Cola
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Coca-Cola - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 50% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ceramica Cleopatra
Coca-Cola
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Liga | Coca-Cola | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.50 | 2.00 | • 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 37% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 33% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 41% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 48% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 70% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Ceramica Cleopatra's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Coca-Cola. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Ceramica Cleopatra 2:0 Coca-Cola. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola?
Ceramica Cleopatra score 2.00 goals per game on average and Coca-Cola 1.50. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 50% of Coca-Cola's.
What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Coca-Cola in?
Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Coca-Cola 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola?
The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.