Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueCairo International StadiumData current as of August 30, 2026

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ceramica Cleopatra plays Coca-Cola in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game is scheduled for September 2, 2026. Venue: Cairo International Stadium.

Recent form

Ceramica Cleopatra has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.50 points per game. Coca-Cola has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Ceramica Cleopatra scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.50. Coca-Cola scores 1.50 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.35 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Ceramica Cleopatra's games and 50% of Coca-Cola's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 0%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ceramica Cleopatra has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.48 per game. Ceramica Cleopatra takes 14.0 shots per game, while Coca-Cola takes 15.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Ceramica Cleopatra leads at halftime in 100% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Coca-Cola leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ceramica Cleopatra's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Coca-Cola, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Egyptian Premier League games average 2.35 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(2.05)
(3.00)
(3.70)

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
2Goals scored / game1.5
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
1.5Goals allowed / game0.5
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
66%Average possession48%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
6Shots on target / game3.5
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14Shots per game15
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
6Shots on target3.5
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
14.3%Shot conversion10%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
66%Possession48%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
1.63xG for1.48
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
1.07xG against1.34
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola

Shooting quality

Ceramica Cleopatra: DominantCoca-Cola: Attacking
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
Accuracy (shots on target)43%23%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Coca-Cola is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 2 pts / game - Coca-Cola

Ceramica Cleopatra
LW
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Coca-Cola
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 33% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.5 goals / game - Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola is 200% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.5 goals / game - Coca-Cola

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: very strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Coca-Cola keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 meczów).

Coca-Cola scoring profile: very strong

Coca-Cola scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).

4Goals scored (season)3
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
3Goals conceded (season)1
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
3.5Average goals per game2
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
4Goals scored (last 5)3
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
50%2 goals50%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
50%3 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
0%4 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
50%2 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
0%3 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
0%4 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

100%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.2 of 2 meczów
45%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
50%Scored in both halves0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
100%BTTS - last 550%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

3 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1 pts / game - Coca-Cola

Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
Coca-Cola - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per game (1st half)1
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
1Goals scored (1st half)0
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
1Average goals (1st half)0
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
0%No goal before half-time100%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)2
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
2.5Average goals (2nd half)2
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
0%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola
50%No goal after half-time0%
Ceramica CleopatraCoca-Cola

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.5

Allows 1.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Coca-Cola - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.001.50
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.01.5
Average goals per game1.02.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Coca-Cola - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.00
Goals scored / game0.01.5
Goals allowed / game0.00.5
Average goals per game0.02.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Coca-Cola
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
200%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Coca-Cola

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Ceramica CleopatraLigaCoca-Cola
Average goals per game 3.502.35 2.00
Both teams scored 100%45% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%40% 0%
Clean sheets 0%35% 50%
Goal before half-time 100%50% 0%
Goal after half-time 100%80% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.35
Average goals per game
45%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.00
Home goals / game
1.35
Away goals / game
+-26%
Home attack advantage
+-35%
Home defensive advantage
+-10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
50%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Ceramica Cleopatra's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Coca-Cola. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Ceramica Cleopatra
2 : 0
Coca-Cola

FAQ

When do Ceramica Cleopatra and Coca-Cola play?

Ceramica Cleopatra face Coca-Cola on September 2, 2026 in Egyptian Premier League at Cairo International Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola?

Ceramica Cleopatra score 2.00 goals per game on average and Coca-Cola 1.50. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 50% of Coca-Cola's.

What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Coca-Cola in?

Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Coca-Cola 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola?

The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.