Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla: match statistics

165%(1.73)
X25%(3.30)
210%(4.20)

Ceramica Cleopatra occupies first place in the table and displays impressive home form with 86% of home matches won, scoring an average of 1.71 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 57% of fixtures. Ghazl El Mehalla is a typical away-draw team (63% draws), failing to score in half of their away matches (FTS% 50%) and holding just a 13% away win rate. The difference in possession (61% vs 45%) and shot quality (4.29 vs 2.13 on target per match) decisively favors the hosts. Despite Ceramica's weaker recent form in the league overall, their dominance in home matches and the guests' offensive helplessness on the road indicate a probable victory for the hosts.

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ceramica Cleopatra play Ghazl El Mehalla in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 5 February 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Ceramica Cleopatra: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ghazl El Mehalla: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.31 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Ghazl El Mehalla scores 0.82 and concedes 0.79. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ceramica Cleopatra 42%, Ghazl El Mehalla 39%. Over 2.5: Ceramica Cleopatra 23%, Ghazl El Mehalla 24%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Ceramica Cleopatra has higher xG: 1.19 vs 1.11. Ceramica Cleopatra: 9.8 shots per match, Ghazl El Mehalla: 8.8.

Match halves

Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.77. Ghazl El Mehalla: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (9 goals). Ghazl El Mehalla: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Ceramica Cleopatra occupies first place in the table and displays impressive home form with 86% of home matches won, scoring an average of 1.71 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 57% of fixtures. Ghazl El Mehalla is a typical away-draw team (63% draws), failing to score in half of their away matches (FTS% 50%) and holding just a 13% away win rate. The difference in possession (61% vs 45%) and shot quality (4.29 vs 2.13 on target per match) decisively favors the hosts. Despite Ceramica's weaker recent form in the league overall, their dominance in home matches and the guests' offensive helplessness on the road indicate a probable victory for the hosts.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
17Shots9
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
8Shots on target3
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
1.95xG1.09
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
3Corners3
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
43Dangerous attacks41
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
11Fouls13
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
4Cards1
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
1.31Goals scored / match0.82
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
0.81Goals conceded / match0.79
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
57%Average possession47%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
3.81Shots on target / match2.3
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.81Shots per match8.76
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
3.81Shots on target2.3
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
13.3%Shot conversion9.3%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
57%Possession47%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
1.19xG for1.11
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
1.24xG against1.32
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

Shooting quality

Ceramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishingGhazl El Mehalla: Balanced
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
Accuracy (shots on target)39%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ghazl El Mehalla is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.4 pts / match - Ghazl El Mehalla

Ceramica Cleopatra
DWLDL
Season result split
46% W31% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-8-6
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-2
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Ghazl El Mehalla
LLWDW
Season result split
18% W61% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-20-7
1.15 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-8-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.82 goals / match - Ghazl El Mehalla

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: mixed

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Ghazl El Mehalla keeps a clean sheet in 55% (18 of 33 matches).

Ghazl El Mehalla scoring profile: mixed

Ghazl El Mehalla scores in 52% of matches (17 of 33 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

34Goals scored (season)27
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
21Goals conceded (season)26
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
2.12Average goals in match1.61
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal52%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
42%2 goals18%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
12%3 goals9%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
0%4 goals3%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal45%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
15%2 goals21%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
4%3 goals12%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
0%4 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 26 matches
39%
Ghazl El Mehalla - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 33 matches
47%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time21%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
8%BTTS in both halves9%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
23%Scored in both halves15%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

BTTS and goal count

19%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
40%BTTS - last 540%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time52%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.03 pts / match - Ghazl El Mehalla

Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
35% leading46% draw19% trailing
Ghazl El Mehalla - half-time state
12% leading67% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.03
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.36
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
0.88Average goals (1st half)0.82
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
69%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
58%No goal before half-time73%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

After half-time (2nd half)

1.62Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
1.23Average goals (2nd half)0.79
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
58%Clean sheet after half-time73%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla
42%No goal after half-time61%
Ceramica CleopatraGhazl El Mehalla

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

42% W35% R23% P
39
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ghazl El Mehalla - second-half results

27% W58% R15% P
34
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Ghazl El Mehalla - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Ghazl El Mehalla
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
5
16-30
4
7
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Ghazl El Mehalla

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Ceramica CleopatraLigaGhazl El Mehalla
Average goals in match 2.122.02 1.61
Both teams scored 42%47% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 23%34% 24%
Clean sheets 38%35% 55%
Goal before half-time 58%58% 39%
Goal after half-time 81%70% 52%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Ceramica Cleopatra 3:2 Ghazl El Mehalla. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla?

Ceramica Cleopatra score 1.31 goals per game on average and Ghazl El Mehalla 0.82. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 39% of Ghazl El Mehalla's.

What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Ghazl El Mehalla in?

Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ghazl El Mehalla 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla?

The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.