Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ismaily SC: match statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra is the clear favorite for this encounter, occupying 1st place in the table with an impressive 88% home win record. The hosts are in excellent home form with a streak of seven consecutive victories, averaging 1.88 goals scored per match while conceding just 0.75. Ismaily SC sits in last place, 21st in the table, with disastrous away form—88% losses, averaging only 0.13 goals scored per away match, and a streak of five consecutive defeats. The gap in quality is immense: the hosts command 61% possession and 4.75 shots on target per match, compared to the visitors' mere 42% possession and 1.38 shots on target. Given such a disparity in strength, goal difference (+9 vs -8), and the current form of both teams, a victory for Ceramica Cleopatra is the most probable scenario.
Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ismaily SC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ceramica Cleopatra played against Ismaily SC in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on February 24, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Ceramica Cleopatra has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Ismaily SC has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.47 goals per game and allows 0.71. Ismaily SC scores 0.53 and allows 1.35. Games in this league average 1.99 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of Ceramica Cleopatra's games and 29% of Ismaily SC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 35%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ceramica Cleopatra has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 0.98 per game. Ceramica Cleopatra takes 10.4 shots per game, while Ismaily SC takes 7.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Ceramica Cleopatra leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.94 goals per game after halftime. Ismaily SC leads at halftime in 12% and scores 0.35 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ceramica Cleopatra's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Ismaily SC, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 1.99 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ceramica Cleopatra is the clear favorite for this encounter, occupying 1st place in the table with an impressive 88% home win record. The hosts are in excellent home form with a streak of seven consecutive victories, averaging 1.88 goals scored per match while conceding just 0.75. Ismaily SC sits in last place, 21st in the table, with disastrous away form—88% losses, averaging only 0.13 goals scored per away match, and a streak of five consecutive defeats. The gap in quality is immense: the hosts command 61% possession and 4.75 shots on target per match, compared to the visitors' mere 42% possession and 1.38 shots on target. Given such a disparity in strength, goal difference (+9 vs -8), and the current form of both teams, a victory for Ceramica Cleopatra is the most probable scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Ismaily SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.6 pts / game - Ismaily SC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 177% better for: goals scored per game.
1.47 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.53 goals / game - Ismaily SC
Ceramica Cleopatra is 90% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.71 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.35 goals / game - Ismaily SC
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 meczów), while Ismaily SC keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 meczów).
Ismaily SC scores in 35% of games (6 of 17 meczów), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 53% (9 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
Over / Under - Ismaily SC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.88 pts / game - Ismaily SC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Ismaily SC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ceramica Cleopatra
Ismaily SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Liga | Ismaily SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.18 | 1.99 | ▼ 1.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 46% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 33% | ▲ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 53% | 35% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 57% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 69% | ▲ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ismaily SC?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Ceramica Cleopatra 1:1 Ismaily SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ismaily SC?
Ceramica Cleopatra score 1.47 goals per game on average and Ismaily SC 0.53. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 29% of Ismaily SC's.
What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Ismaily SC in?
Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Ismaily SC 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ismaily SC?
The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ismaily SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.