Ceramica Cleopatra vs Masr: match statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra vs Masr: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ceramica Cleopatra played against Masr in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on October 31, 2026. Venue: Cairo International Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Ceramica Cleopatra has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Masr has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.86 goals per game and allows 1.00. Masr scores 1.14 and allows 1.14. Games in this league average 2.31 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Ceramica Cleopatra's games and 57% of Masr's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 43%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Masr has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.38 per game. Ceramica Cleopatra takes 11.3 shots per game, while Masr takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Ceramica Cleopatra leads at halftime in 57% of its games and scores 1.14 goals per game after halftime. Masr leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.86 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ceramica Cleopatra's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Masr, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 2.31 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ceramica Cleopatra have won 3 of their 4 home matches and sit 4th, while Masr are eighth and have won just 1 of their 4 away games. The hosts average 1.75 goals at home with a 14% shot-conversion rate, whereas the visitors score 0.75 goals per away game with a 6% conversion rate, despite both teams averaging 12.5 shots. Ceramica have kept a clean sheet in 75% of their home matches and concede an average of 0.5 goals there, further limiting the visitors’ chances. However, the gap in the quality of chances created is narrow: the hosts average 1.46 xG and Masr 1.39, so a closely contested match cannot be ruled out. In their last 5 matches, Ceramica have recorded 3 wins, while Masr have won 2 and drawn 2. Nevertheless, the hosts’ superior finishing and home record point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The scenario in which at least one team fails to score is slightly more likely. Masr average 0.75 goals away from home, and their shot conversion rate is 6%, limiting their chances of scoring despite an average xG of 1.39. Ceramica Cleopatra, meanwhile, have failed to score in 33% of their matches, while Masr have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their games. Factors supporting BTTS - Yes include Ceramica’s lack of clean sheets and their season-long rate of matches in which both teams scored at 67%; however, that figure has fallen to 20% across their last five matches. These conflicting signals support a cautious BTTS - No pick rather than a confident prediction.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been breached in any of Masr’s away matches, while it has held in 67% of Ceramica’s home games. The teams’ last five matches have produced averages of 2.4 and 2.6 goals respectively, both closer to the league average of 2.34 than to the total required for at least four goals. Ceramica score an average of 1.67 goals at home, but Masr concede just 0.75 away and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their matches. Masr, meanwhile, average 0.75 goals scored away, although their xG of 1.39 suggests scope to improve their finishing. Therefore, the 2.35-goal projection favors Under 3.5, even though a total of two or three goals remains a realistic outcome.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw is the most likely outcome: Masr were level at the break in 3 of their 4 away matches and did not score before half-time in any of them. Ceramica Cleopatra were also level at half-time in 1 of their 3 home matches, while the visitors kept a clean sheet in the first half in 75% of their away games, so an early lead for the hosts is far from certain. After the break, the hosts have the stronger chance of settling the contest: they have won 67% of their home matches and score an average of 1.67 goals there, while Masr have won 25% of their away matches and average 0.75 goals on the road. In their last 5 matches, Ceramica won the second half 3 times, compared with just once for Masr, reinforcing the scenario of a home win after a closely contested first half. The risk of a draw remains significant, as the visitors have drawn 50% of their away matches and conceded an average of just 0.75 goals per game in those fixtures.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Masr | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 2 pts / game - Masr
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 63% better for: goals scored per game.
1.86 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.14 goals / game - Masr
Ceramica Cleopatra is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.14 goals / game - Masr
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 100% of games (7 of 7 games), while Masr keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).
Masr scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
Over / Under - Masr
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1 pts / game - Masr
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Masr - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ceramica Cleopatra
Masr
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Liga | Masr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.86 | 2.31 | • 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 47% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 43% | 38% | ▲ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 57% | 30% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 58% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 82% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Ceramica Cleopatra's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Masr. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ceramica Cleopatra vs Masr?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Ceramica Cleopatra 2:1 Masr. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Masr?
Ceramica Cleopatra score 1.86 goals per game on average and Masr 1.14. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 57% of Masr's.
What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Masr in?
Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Masr 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Masr?
The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Masr — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.