Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueCairo International StadiumData current as of October 18, 2026

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Petrojet: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Petrojet: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ceramica Cleopatra plays Petrojet in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game is scheduled for October 21, 2026. Venue: Cairo International Stadium.

Recent form

Ceramica Cleopatra has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Petrojet has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 1.17. Petrojet scores 1.67 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.22 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Ceramica Cleopatra's games and 100% of Petrojet's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 83%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 37% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Petrojet has the higher season xG average, 2.04 to 1.36 per game. Ceramica Cleopatra takes 10.8 shots per game, while Petrojet takes 18.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Ceramica Cleopatra leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.17 goals per game after halftime. Petrojet leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.17 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ceramica Cleopatra's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Petrojet, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Egyptian Premier League games average 2.22 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 37% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(1.95)
(2.80)
(4.23)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
1.83Goals scored / game1.67
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
1.17Goals allowed / game1.67
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
59%Average possession50%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
5.17Shots on target / game5.5
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.83Shots per game18.67
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
5.17Shots on target5.5
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
16.9%Shot conversion8.9%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
59%Possession50%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
1.36xG for2.04
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
1.28xG against1.34
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet

Shooting quality

Ceramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishingPetrojet: Attacking
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
Accuracy (shots on target)48%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 71% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.4 pts / game - Petrojet

Ceramica Cleopatra
WWWWL
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-2
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
LWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Petrojet
LLWWD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 10% better for: goals scored per game.

1.83 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.67 goals / game - Petrojet

Ceramica Cleopatra is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.17 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.67 goals / game - Petrojet

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: very strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 games), while Petrojet keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 games).

Petrojet scoring profile: very strong

Petrojet scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 games), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 games).

11Goals scored (season)10
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
7Goals conceded (season)10
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
3Average goals per game3.33
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
10Goals scored (last 5)9
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
67%2 goals67%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
17%3 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
0%4 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
33%2 goals50%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
17%3 goals17%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
17%4 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time0%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
33%Scored in both halves17%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS83%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time83%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.83 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.17 pts / game - Petrojet

Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing
Petrojet - half-time state
33% leading17% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.83Points per game (1st half)1.17
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.33
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
83%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
33%No goal before half-time67%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per game (2nd half)1.5
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
1.17Goals scored (2nd half)1.17
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
1.83Average goals (2nd half)2
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
50%Clean sheet after half-time17%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet
33%No goal after half-time17%
Ceramica CleopatraPetrojet

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

67% W0% D33% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Petrojet - second-half results

33% W50% D17% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.40
Goals scored / game0.61.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Petrojet - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game1.00.8
Average goals per game1.62.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Petrojet
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.17
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
143%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
166%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

Petrojet

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Ceramica CleopatraLigaPetrojet
Average goals per game▲ 3.002.22▲ 3.33
Both teams scored▲ 50%43%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%37%▲ 83%
Clean sheets▲ 50%33%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%52%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%83%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.22
Average goals per game
43%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.10
Home goals / game
1.12
Away goals / game
+-2%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defensive advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
52%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Ceramica Cleopatra's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Petrojet. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Ceramica Cleopatra
2 : 1
Petrojet

FAQ

When do Ceramica Cleopatra and Petrojet play?

Ceramica Cleopatra face Petrojet on October 21, 2026 in Egyptian Premier League at Cairo International Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Petrojet?

Ceramica Cleopatra score 1.83 goals per game on average and Petrojet 1.67. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 100% of Petrojet's.

What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Petrojet in?

Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Petrojet 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Petrojet?

The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Petrojet — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.