Japan - J1 LeagueKINCHO StadiumData current as of October 15, 2026

Cerezo Osaka vs Yokohama F. Marinos: match statistics

Cerezo Osaka vs Yokohama F. Marinos: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Cerezo Osaka played against Yokohama F. Marinos in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: KINCHO Stadium. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Cerezo Osaka has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Yokohama F. Marinos has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Cerezo Osaka scores 0.88 goals per game and allows 1.50. Yokohama F. Marinos scores 1.63 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.99 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 38% of Cerezo Osaka's games and 50% of Yokohama F. Marinos's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 25%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Cerezo Osaka has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.29 per game. Cerezo Osaka takes 11.6 shots per game, while Yokohama F. Marinos takes 11.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Cerezo Osaka leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Yokohama F. Marinos leads at halftime in 63% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Cerezo Osaka's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Yokohama F. Marinos, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J1 League games average 2.99 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cerezo Osaka are unbeaten at home, winning 3 of their 4 matches and conceding just 0.25 goals per game on average, giving them a slight edge heading into this match. However, Yokohama F. Marinos have been in better form over their last five league games, recording 3 wins and 2 draws, while the hosts have won twice, drawn twice and lost once. The visitors average 1.5 goals away from home compared with Cerezo’s 1.25 at home, and also hit the target more often: 4 times per match to the hosts’ 3.5. The quality of chances created is similar, with Cerezo’s home xG at 1.39 and Yokohama’s away xG at 1.34; the hosts could also take advantage of the fact that the visitors allow chances worth an average xG of 1.52 on the road. Cerezo’s strong defensive record at home points towards a “1” pick, although Yokohama’s good run means a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 50% of their matches in the analyzed split, with the rate rising to 60% for each over their last five games. Cerezo average 1.75 goals at home, while Yokohama average 1.5 away, which points to a chance of both sides finding the net. Over their last five matches, their average attacking xG was similar, at 1.48 and 1.51 respectively, indicating that both teams regularly create scoring opportunities. However, caution is warranted: each has kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches, and Yokohama have conceded just 0.6 goals per game recently. Therefore, BTTS - Yes has a slight edge, but it is not a strong signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: both teams finished below this line in 75% of their matches, and the projected total is 2.5 goals. In their last five matches, Cerezo averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Yokohama averaged 1.6 scored and conceded just 0.6. Although both teams scored in 100% of the season matches included in the analysis, Over 2.5 goals landed in only 25% of matches for each side. Average attacking xG stands at 1.24 for Cerezo and 1.34 for Yokohama, supporting a scenario in which both teams score without producing a high-scoring game. Therefore, the 3.5 line offers a clearer edge than lower goal totals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In their last five matches, Yokohama held a lead at the break four times and did not concede in the first half, while Cerezo led twice and conceded an average of 0.8 goals before half-time. Over this period, the visitors averaged 2.2 points per match compared with the hosts’ 1.6, and conceded just 0.6 goals per match against Cerezo’s 1.6. This points to a scenario in which Yokohama take the lead and hold on to it until the final whistle. However, the HT/FT pick is not clear-cut: Cerezo led at the break in three of their four home matches, and both teams averaged 1.75 points per match in these fixtures.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
10Shots13
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
2Shots on target2
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.16xG1.32
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
5Corners4
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
53Dangerous attacks50
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
11Fouls13
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
4Cards1
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0.88Goals scored / game1.63
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.5Goals allowed / game1.13
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
57%Average possession49%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
3.38Shots on target / game3.5
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.63Shots per game11.5
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
3.38Shots on target3.5
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
7.5%Shot conversion14.1%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
57%Possession49%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.33xG for1.29
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.51xG against1.42
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Shooting quality

Cerezo Osaka: BalancedYokohama F. Marinos: Efficient finishing
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
Accuracy (shots on target)29%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.47

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Yokohama F. Marinos is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Cerezo Osaka · 1.6 pts / game - Yokohama F. Marinos

Cerezo Osaka
LWDLD
Season result split
38% W25% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-3
1.38 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Yokohama F. Marinos
LDWDW
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-2
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
WLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Yokohama F. Marinos is 85% better for: goals scored per game.

0.88 goals / game - Cerezo Osaka · 1.63 goals / game - Yokohama F. Marinos

Yokohama F. Marinos is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - Cerezo Osaka · 1.13 goals / game - Yokohama F. Marinos

Cerezo Osaka scoring profile: mixed

Cerezo Osaka scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 games), while Yokohama F. Marinos keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 games).

Yokohama F. Marinos scoring profile: very strong

Yokohama F. Marinos scores in 100% of games (8 of 8 games), while Cerezo Osaka keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 games).

7Goals scored (season)13
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
12Goals conceded (season)9
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
2.38Average goals per game2.75
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal100%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
25%2 goals50%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0%3 goals13%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0%4 goals0%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal50%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
25%2 goals25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
25%3 goals25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
13%4 goals13%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0%BTTS in both halves25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
13%Scored in both halves50%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
40%BTTS - last 560%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
13%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Yokohama F. Marinos is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / game - Cerezo Osaka · 2.25 pts / game - Yokohama F. Marinos

Cerezo Osaka - half-time state
25% leading38% draw38% trailing
Yokohama F. Marinos - half-time state
63% leading38% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per game (1st half)2.25
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.88
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.13
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
50%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
75%No goal before half-time25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per game (2nd half)1.38
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.13Average goals (2nd half)1.63
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
63%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
50%No goal after half-time25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Cerezo Osaka - second-half results

38% W25% D38% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Yokohama F. Marinos - second-half results

38% W25% D38% L
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at halftime in 63% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Cerezo Osaka - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Yokohama F. Marinos - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.40
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Cerezo Osaka
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
0
4
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Yokohama F. Marinos
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
3
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.57
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Cerezo Osaka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Yokohama F. Marinos

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 31% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Cerezo OsakaLigaYokohama F. Marinos
Average goals per game▼ 2.382.99▼ 2.75
Both teams scored▼ 38%60%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 38%54%▼ 25%
Clean sheets▲ 38%22%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%71%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▼ 75%88%• 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.62
Home goals / game
1.37
Away goals / game
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Cerezo OsakaYellow cardJavier Hernández Cabrera
  2. Cerezo OsakaYellow cardAyumu Ohata
  3. Cerezo OsakaYellow cardJackson Irvine
  4. Cerezo OsakaSubstitutionOn: Travis TakahashiOff: Javier Hernández Cabrera
  5. Cerezo OsakaSubstitutionOn: Yota KomiOff: Lucas Fernandes
  6. Yokohama F. MarinosYellow cardTakuto Kimura
  7. Cerezo OsakaSubstitutionOn: Kosei OkazawaOff: Yumeki Yokoyama
  8. Cerezo OsakaSubstitutionOn: Shinji KagawaOff: Pablo David Sabbag Daccarett
  9. Yokohama F. MarinosSubstitutionOn: Kei ChinenOff: Kosuke Matsumura
  10. Cerezo OsakaYellow cardShinji Kagawa

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Cerezo Osaka's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Yokohama F. Marinos. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Yokohama F. Marinos
3 : 1
Cerezo Osaka
Cerezo Osaka
1 : 0
Yokohama F. Marinos

FAQ

What was the result of Cerezo Osaka vs Yokohama F. Marinos?

The J1 League match finished Cerezo Osaka 0:0 Yokohama F. Marinos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cerezo Osaka and Yokohama F. Marinos?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cerezo Osaka won 1, Yokohama F. Marinos won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cerezo Osaka vs Yokohama F. Marinos?

Cerezo Osaka score 0.88 goals per game on average and Yokohama F. Marinos 1.63. The J1 League average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Cerezo Osaka's matches and 50% of Yokohama F. Marinos's.

What form are Cerezo Osaka and Yokohama F. Marinos in?

Over the last 5 games Cerezo Osaka have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Yokohama F. Marinos 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cerezo Osaka vs Yokohama F. Marinos?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.