Ceuta vs Racing Santander: match statistics
Ceuta vs Racing Santander: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ceuta played against Racing Santander in Segunda División (Spain). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Ceuta has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Racing Santander has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Ceuta scores 1.22 goals per game and allows 1.58. Racing Santander scores 2.08 and allows 1.53. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Ceuta's games and 72% of Racing Santander's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 72%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Racing Santander has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.25 per game. Ceuta takes 10.7 shots per game, while Racing Santander takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Ceuta leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Racing Santander leads at halftime in 42% and scores 1.22 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ceuta's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (10 goals). For Racing Santander, it is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Segunda División games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Racing Santander to win ('2'), as the visitors top the table (1st) with 21 wins this season versus Ceuta's 14. The offensive gap is clear: Racing have scored 75 goals this season and 13 in the last 5 matches, while Ceuta have 44 this season and just 5 in their last 5; visitors average 1.78 goals away, hosts 1.47 at home. Although Ceuta win 65% of home matches and generate 1.47 xG with 12.41 shots and 4.65 on target on average while conceding only 1.06 goals per game, Racing display superior finishing efficiency (conversion 16% vs 12%) and better recent form with 1.8 points per game over the last 5 versus Ceuta's 1.2. Defensively both teams are vulnerable — Ceuta have conceded 57 goals this season, and Racing concede 1.67 goals away on average and allow 1.56 xG to opponents, which points to an open, goal-enducing game. Based on this I estimate the chances as: Racing win 55%, draw 20%, Ceuta win 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The “Both Teams To Score” scenario looks more likely as Ceuta have BTTS in 67% of home matches while Racing have BTTS in 78% of away matches, yielding an average near 73% which significantly exceeds the league average of 55%. Ceuta score 2.39 goals at home on average and generate 1.85 xG while conceding 1.41 xG; Racing away score 1.78 goals with 1.24 xG and concede 1.56 xG — both teams create and allow chances. Additionally, clean sheets are uncommon: 28% for Ceuta and only 11% for Racing, and combinations of over2.5 and BTTS occur for the home side in 61% and for the away side in 67% of cases. In the last 5 matches both teams also frequently recorded BTTS: Ceuta 60% and Racing 80%, with last-5 goals averages of Ceuta 1.0 scored/1.4 conceded and Racing 2.6 scored/2.2 conceded, which increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model for this match indicates about 1.71 xG for Ceuta and 1.32 xG for Racing, totaling 3.03 expected goals. Seasonal metrics confirm an offensive profile: Ceuta has over 1.5 in 83% of home matches, Racing in 89% of away matches, and Over 2.5 occurs for the home side in 78% and for the visitors in 67% of games. The hosts average 16.22 shots and 6.61 on target per match, Racing 10.83 shots and 4.22 on target; with conversion rates of 15% and 16% this supports a realistic goal tempo for both teams. A Poisson distribution with a mean of 3.03 gives about an 81% chance of at least 2 goals, ~58% for at least 3, and ~36% for 4 or more, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Over 2.5 remains an attractive second option (~62% probability) supported by the season figures 78%/67%, while Over 3.5 looks considerably less likely (~36%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal metrics indicate an advantage for Ceuta: they average 2.39 goals per match versus Racing’s 1.78, have higher xG (1.85 vs 1.24) and more shots on target (6.61 vs 4.22), pointing to greater creative potential. At half-time Ceuta lead in 50% of matches, score on average 0.94 goals and concede 0.72, while the visitors register 0.78 scored and 0.67 conceded at the break, making an HT lead for the home side the most likely outcome. The second half is, however, active — an average of 2.11 goals in second halves of the home team’s matches and 2.00 for the visitors, with 89% of matches seeing over 0.5 goals after the break — so there is a tangible risk of late goals and a turnaround. Considering the hosts win 67% of matches this season and combining that with the xG and first-half advantages, the safest HT/FT pick is 1/1, although 1/X and X/1 scenarios are possible (the visitors have won 60% of their last five matches).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ceuta | Racing Santander | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Racing Santander is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Ceuta · 1.8 pts / game - Racing Santander
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing Santander is 70% better for: goals scored per game.
1.22 goals / game - Ceuta · 2.08 goals / game - Racing Santander
Ceuta scores in 72% of games (26 of 36 meczów), while Racing Santander keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 36 meczów).
Racing Santander scores in 92% of games (33 of 36 meczów), while Ceuta keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ceuta
Over / Under - Racing Santander
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing Santander is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - Ceuta · 1.61 pts / game - Racing Santander
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ceuta - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Racing Santander - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ceuta
Racing Santander
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).
Teams vs league
| Ceuta | Liga | Racing Santander | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.81 | 2.63 | ▲ 3.61 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 55% | ▲ 72% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 50% | ▲ 72% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 27% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 69% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 61% | 75% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Ceuta's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Racing Santander. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ceuta vs Racing Santander?
The Segunda División match finished Ceuta 0:0 Racing Santander. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ceuta vs Racing Santander?
Ceuta score 1.22 goals per game on average and Racing Santander 2.08. The Segunda División average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Ceuta's matches and 72% of Racing Santander's.
What form are Ceuta and Racing Santander in?
Over the last 5 games Ceuta have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Racing Santander 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceuta vs Racing Santander?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ceuta vs Racing Santander: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


