Portugal - Liga 3Data current as of 23 July 2026

CF Os Belenenses vs CD Mafra: match statistics

CF Os Belenenses crest
CF Os Belenenses
3 : 1half-time 0:0
CD Mafra crest
CD Mafra

CF Os Belenenses vs CD Mafra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CF Os Belenenses play CD Mafra in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match date is 16 May 2026 at 17:30. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

CF Os Belenenses: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. CD Mafra: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CF Os Belenenses scores 1.63 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. CD Mafra scores 1.41 and concedes 1.34. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CF Os Belenenses 56%, CD Mafra 63%. Over 2.5: CF Os Belenenses 53%, CD Mafra 47%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

CF Os Belenenses has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.41. CF Os Belenenses: 12.1 shots per match, CD Mafra: 10.3.

Match halves

CF Os Belenenses: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.75. CD Mafra: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

CF Os Belenenses: 31-45+ (13 goals). CD Mafra: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-1-0. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I predict a home win (1): CF Os Belenenses has the stronger defense at home, conceding 0.93 goals per match compared to CD Mafra’s 1.4 away. Additionally, the hosts generate more quality chances — Belenenses’ average xG is 1.57 versus the visitors’ 1.35 xG, and shots per game are 12.4 (4.6 on target) vs 9.2 (3.93 on target) for Mafra, translating into 1.33 goals scored by the hosts and 1.27 for the visitors away. However, Mafra are in better form: in the last 5 matches they scored 9 goals and averaged 2.0 points per game, while Belenenses scored 6 goals and averaged 1.2 points per game over the same period. The visitors show better shot efficiency (conversion 14% vs 11% for the hosts) and are less likely to finish matches goalless (20% vs 27%), which makes each of their attacks more dangerous despite a worse clean sheet rate (20% vs 40%). Considering Belenenses’ defensive edge and higher xG alongside Mafra’s superior form and conversion, I give a slight advantage to the hosts and tip a Belenenses victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
15Shots15
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
5Shots on target5
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
1.62xG1.77
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
2Corners3
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
45Dangerous attacks65
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
11Fouls16
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
0Cards2
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
1.63Goals scored / match1.41
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
1Goals conceded / match1.34
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
50%Average possession50%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
4.44Shots on target / match4.5
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.06Shots per match10.28
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
4.44Shots on target4.5
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
13.5%Shot conversion13.7%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
50%Possession50%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
1.49xG for1.41
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
1.16xG against1.27
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

Shooting quality

CF Os Belenenses: Efficient finishingCD Mafra: Efficient finishing
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
Accuracy (shots on target)37%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CF Os Belenenses is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - CF Os Belenenses · 1.4 pts / match - CD Mafra

CF Os Belenenses
LDDWW
Season result split
59% W22% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-7-6
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
CD Mafra
LWWDL
Season result split
44% W28% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-9
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CF Os Belenenses is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.63 goals / match - CF Os Belenenses · 1.41 goals / match - CD Mafra

CF Os Belenenses is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - CF Os Belenenses · 1.34 goals / match - CD Mafra

CF Os Belenenses scoring profile: very strong

CF Os Belenenses scores in 88% of matches (28 of 32 matches), while CD Mafra keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).

CD Mafra scoring profile: very strong

CD Mafra scores in 88% of matches (28 of 32 matches), while CF Os Belenenses keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

52Goals scored (season)45
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
32Goals conceded (season)43
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
2.63Average goals in match2.75
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
9Goals scored (last 5)8
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal88%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
47%2 goals38%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
22%3 goals13%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
6%4 goals3%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal69%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
31%2 goals34%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
3%3 goals22%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
3%4 goals9%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
CF Os Belenenses - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.18 of 32 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time16%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
9%BTTS in both halves6%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
38%Scored in both halves28%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
100%BTTS - last 560%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CF Os Belenenses is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.78 pts / match - CF Os Belenenses · 1.38 pts / match - CD Mafra

CF Os Belenenses - half-time state
47% leading38% draw16% trailing
CD Mafra - half-time state
34% leading34% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.78Points per match (1st half)1.38
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.59
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
1.34Average goals (1st half)1.13
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
59%Clean sheet before half-time59%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
31%No goal before half-time56%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.53Points per match (2nd half)1.41
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
1.28Average goals (2nd half)1.63
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
56%Clean sheet after half-time47%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra
44%No goal after half-time28%
CF Os BelenensesCD Mafra

CF Os Belenenses - second-half results

34% W50% R16% P
57
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Mafra - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
44
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CF Os Belenenses - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
CD Mafra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.8
Average goals in match0.82.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CF Os Belenenses
ScoredConceded
10
6
0-15
5
3
16-30
13
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
7
8
61-75
13
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

CD Mafra
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
8
31-45
8
7
46-60
7
10
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
121%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CF Os Belenenses

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

CD Mafra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CF Os BelenensesLigaCD Mafra
Average goals in match 2.632.23 2.75
Both teams scored 56%49% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%40% 47%
Clean sheets 38%31% 31%
Goal before half-time 78%66% 69%
Goal after half-time 69%74% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): CF Os Belenenses 2 - 1 - 0 CD Mafra. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.

CD Mafra
1 : 4
CF Os Belenenses
CF Os Belenenses
2 : 1
CD Mafra
CD Mafra
1 : 1
CF Os Belenenses

FAQ

What was the result of CF Os Belenenses vs CD Mafra?

The Liga 3 match finished CF Os Belenenses 3:1 CD Mafra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CF Os Belenenses and CD Mafra?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches CF Os Belenenses won 2, CD Mafra won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CF Os Belenenses vs CD Mafra?

CF Os Belenenses score 1.63 goals per game on average and CD Mafra 1.41. The Liga 3 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 56% of CF Os Belenenses's matches and 63% of CD Mafra's.

What form are CF Os Belenenses and CD Mafra in?

Over the last 5 games CF Os Belenenses have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CD Mafra 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CF Os Belenenses vs CD Mafra?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.