Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong: match statistics
Chanmari FC displays solid home form with a three-match unbeaten streak at home (draw-win-draw) and a goal difference of +1 at their own stadium. The hosts stand out with their effectiveness in home matches, scoring an average of 1.33 goals with a decent shot conversion rate of 10%. Shillong Lajong has not played any official away match this season, which confirms the absence of any away statistics – this is a significant risk factor for the visitors. Chanmari holds the advantage of experience at their own venue and more stable form, which speaks in favor of their victory. Considering the hosts' tendency for draws (67% of home matches) and the lack of data on Shillong's away strength, there is also a realistic chance of a points split, but the home advantage and Chanmari's effectiveness so far give them the highest chances of securing three points.
Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chanmari played against Shillong Lajong in I-League (India). The game was played on March 19, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Chanmari has 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.67 points per game. Shillong Lajong has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.33 points per game.
Scoring records
Chanmari scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.00. Shillong Lajong scores 1.33 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Chanmari's games and 100% of Shillong Lajong's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 67%, compared with league averages of 75% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chanmari has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.37 per game. Chanmari takes 13.3 shots per game, while Shillong Lajong takes 8.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Chanmari leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Shillong Lajong leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chanmari's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Shillong Lajong, it is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
I-League games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 75% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chanmari FC displays solid home form with a three-match unbeaten streak at home (draw-win-draw) and a goal difference of +1 at their own stadium. The hosts stand out with their effectiveness in home matches, scoring an average of 1.33 goals with a decent shot conversion rate of 10%. Shillong Lajong has not played any official away match this season, which confirms the absence of any away statistics – this is a significant risk factor for the visitors. Chanmari holds the advantage of experience at their own venue and more stable form, which speaks in favor of their victory. Considering the hosts' tendency for draws (67% of home matches) and the lack of data on Shillong's away strength, there is also a realistic chance of a points split, but the home advantage and Chanmari's effectiveness so far give them the highest chances of securing three points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chanmari | Shillong Lajong | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chanmari is 26% better for: last-5 form.
1.67 pts / game - Chanmari · 1.33 pts / game - Shillong Lajong
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chanmari is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Chanmari · 1.33 goals / game - Shillong Lajong
Chanmari scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).
Shillong Lajong scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Chanmari keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chanmari
Over / Under - Shillong Lajong
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chanmari is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - Chanmari · 1.33 pts / game - Shillong Lajong
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chanmari - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Shillong Lajong - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.67 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 33% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 33% |
| No goal | 67% | 67% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.33 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.7 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 67% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chanmari
Shillong Lajong
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).
Teams vs league
| Chanmari | Liga | Shillong Lajong | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.33 | 2.63 | • 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 67% | 75% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 16% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 75% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong?
The I-League match finished Chanmari 1:1 Shillong Lajong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong?
Chanmari score 1.33 goals per game on average and Shillong Lajong 1.33. The I-League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Chanmari's matches and 100% of Shillong Lajong's.
What form are Chanmari and Shillong Lajong in?
Over the last 5 games Chanmari have a 1-2-0 record (1.67 points per game) and Shillong Lajong 1-1-1 (1.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.