Chapecoense vs Remo: match statistics
Chapecoense vs Remo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chapecoense play Remo in Serie A (Brazil). The match date is 17 May 2026 at 23:30. Venue: Arena Condá. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Chapecoense: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Remo: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chapecoense scores 1.00 and concedes 1.94 goals per match. Remo scores 1.17 and concedes 1.61. League average: 2.66 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chapecoense 65%, Remo 56%. Over 2.5: Chapecoense 47%, Remo 44%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Chapecoense: 12.8 shots per match, Remo: 12.2.
Match halves
Chapecoense: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.65. Remo: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.61.
Goals by minute
Chapecoense: 76-90+ (8 goals). Remo: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie A: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I expect a draw: Remo has better form over the last five matches (avg. 2.0 points per game and 3 wins), but Chapecoense creates more chances at home (avg. 15.75 shots, 4.13 on target per game and xG 1.56) and scores an avg. 1.38 goals per home game. Chapecoense has scored 14 goals this season and 5 in the last 5 matches, while Remo has 16 goals this season and 8 in the last 5, yet only 0.88 goals avg. away and failed to score in 63% of their away matches. Both defenses are vulnerable: Chapecoense concedes 2.13 goals per home game, Remo 2.00 away, and average xG against is 1.62 vs 1.59, indicating an open game with goals at both ends. The hosts have a higher shot conversion (9% vs 7%) and more shots per game, but 50% of their home matches end in draws and Chapecoense has averaged just 0.8 points in the last five matches, which offsets the home advantage. Therefore I assign the highest probability to a draw: draw 45%, home win 30%, away win 25%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chapecoense | Remo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Remo is 900% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Chapecoense · 2 pts / match - Remo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Remo is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Chapecoense · 1.17 goals / match - Remo
Remo is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.94 goals / match - Chapecoense · 1.61 goals / match - Remo
Chapecoense scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while Remo keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).
Remo scores in 61% of matches (11 of 18 matches), while Chapecoense keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Chapecoense
Over / Under — Remo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chapecoense - second-half results
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Remo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chapecoense
Remo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Chapecoense | Liga | Remo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.94 | 2.66 | ▲ 2.78 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 58% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 50% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 23% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 77% | • 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 78% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Chapecoense 0 - 2 - 0 Remo. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chapecoense vs Remo?
The Serie A match finished Chapecoense 2:3 Remo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chapecoense and Remo?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chapecoense won 0, Remo won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chapecoense vs Remo?
Chapecoense score 1.00 goals per game on average and Remo 1.17. The Serie A average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Chapecoense's matches and 56% of Remo's.
What form are Chapecoense and Remo in?
Over the last 5 games Chapecoense have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Remo 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chapecoense vs Remo?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.