United States - USL ChampionshipMUSC Health StadiumData current as of September 07, 2026

Charleston Battery vs Detroit City FC: match statistics

Charleston Battery vs Detroit City FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Charleston Battery played against Detroit City FC in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on May 30, 2026. Venue: MUSC Health Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Charleston Battery has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Detroit City FC has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Charleston Battery scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.44. Detroit City FC scores 1.20 and allows 0.80. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Charleston Battery's games and 50% of Detroit City FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 60%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Charleston Battery has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.49 per game. Charleston Battery takes 12.2 shots per game, while Detroit City FC takes 12.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Charleston Battery leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.78 goals per game after halftime. Detroit City FC leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.80 after halftime.

When the teams score

Charleston Battery's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Detroit City FC, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL Championship games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Charleston Battery score an average of 2.5 goals per home match, have an xG of 2.04 and average 7 shots on target, translating to 12 goals this season and 10 goals in the last 5 matches. Detroit City score only 0.6 goals per away match, have an xG of 1.38, 3.2 shots on target and as many as 40% of matches without scoring, while their away goal difference stands at -3. Defensively the hosts concede 1.0 goal at home on average with xG against 0.97, whereas the visitors concede 1.2 goals away with xG against 1.4, so Charleston allows fewer high-quality chances. Although Detroit are higher in the table (4th vs 15th), the hosts have 3 wins in the last 5 matches and very strong home efficiency (Home Win% 75% and Home Loss% 0%), while the visitors are weaker away (Away Win% 0% and Away Loss% 60%). Considering Charleston’s advantage in xG (2.04 vs 1.38), shots on target (7 vs 3.2) and clean-sheet rate (0% vs 40% of matches without a goal), I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Charleston at home averages 1.8 goals scored and only 0.4 conceded, with a 60% clean sheet rate this season, which strongly favors No Goal from visitors. Detroit away scores 0.6 on average, records 3.2 shots on target and a conversion rate of only 5%, so their realistic chance of scoring is low despite created chances. xG is 1.56 for Charleston versus 1.38 for Detroit, while xG against is 1.03 (Charleston) and 1.40 (Detroit), indicating mixed signals in chance creation but Detroit’s poor finishing reduces the likelihood of a goal. In the last 5 matches BTTS for the home side occurred only 20% versus 60% for Detroit, and Charleston in that period averaged 2.0 scored and 1.2 conceded, therefore I ultimately assign a higher probability to the No (no BTTS) scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Charleston has a seasonal goals-per-game average of 1.8 with xG 1.56, while Detroit scores only 0.6 goals per game despite xG 1.38; additionally Detroit concedes 1.2 goals per game on average, which favors a higher total for Charleston. In the last 5 matches Charleston averages 2.0 goals and 80% of games with Over 2.5 goals, while Detroit in its last 5 matches averages 1.2 goals and 60% of games Over 2.5, which together increases the probability of the over. Considering shot conversion rates of 13% for Charleston versus 5% for Detroit and the xG comparison (1.56 vs 1.38) I estimate expected goals at 1.65 for Charleston and 0.95 for Detroit (total 2.60). As a result the strongest signal is Over 2.5 (approx. 68% probability); Over 1.5 is very likely (~85%), while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~22%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis indicates the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1) — I assign it a 48% probability. Charleston led at the break in 2 of 5 matches (40%) and were level at half-time in 3 of 5 (60%), and they score an average of 0.8 goals before the interval versus 0.0 for Detroit, which favors a draw in the first half. The home side win 100% of their home matches, average 1.8 goals scored at home and concede 0.4, with xG of 1.56 versus 1.38 for the visitors; additionally they record more shots on target (4.4 vs 3.2) and better conversion rate (13% vs 5%), supporting a final victory for the hosts. In second halves Charleston won 80% of the time and scored an average of 1.0 goals while conceding 0.2, which is why I increased the probability for X/1 (48%) and 1/1 (36%), whereas scenarios beginning with the visitors leading at the break were given 0% due to the absence of such half-time performances.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
10Shots9
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
6Shots on target4
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
1.38xG1.2
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
4Corners6
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
45Dangerous attacks48
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
16Fouls9
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
5Cards2
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
1.33Goals scored / game1.2
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
1.44Goals allowed / game0.8
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
57%Average possession53%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
4.89Shots on target / game3.8
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.22Shots per game12.9
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
4.89Shots on target3.8
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
10.9%Shot conversion9.3%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
57%Possession53%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
1.55xG for1.49
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
1.3xG against1.22
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

Shooting quality

Charleston Battery: BalancedDetroit City FC: Balanced
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
Accuracy (shots on target)40%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Detroit City FC is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Charleston Battery · 1.4 pts / game - Detroit City FC

Charleston Battery
LDLWL
Season result split
44% W11% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-4
1.44 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Detroit City FC
LWLWD
Season result split
50% W20% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-3
1.70 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 11% better for: goals scored per game.

1.33 goals / game - Charleston Battery · 1.2 goals / game - Detroit City FC

Detroit City FC is 80% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.44 goals / game - Charleston Battery · 0.8 goals / game - Detroit City FC

Charleston Battery scoring profile: mixed

Charleston Battery scores in 56% of games (5 of 9 meczów), while Detroit City FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (5 of 10 meczów).

Detroit City FC scoring profile: very strong

Detroit City FC scores in 80% of games (8 of 10 meczów), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 meczów).

12Goals scored (season)12
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
13Goals conceded (season)8
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
2.78Average goals per game2
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
5Goals scored (last 5)6
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
9Goals conceded (last 5)6
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal80%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
44%2 goals30%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
22%3 goals10%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
11%4 goals0%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal50%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
33%2 goals30%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
22%3 goals0%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
11%4 goals0%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

33%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.3 of 9 meczów
56%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time10%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
33%Scored in both halves20%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
20%BTTS - last 580%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / game - Charleston Battery · 1.2 pts / game - Detroit City FC

Charleston Battery - half-time state
33% leading44% draw22% trailing
Detroit City FC - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per game (1st half)1.2
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
1Average goals (1st half)0.7
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
78%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
67%No goal before half-time70%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per game (2nd half)1.7
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
1.78Average goals (2nd half)1.3
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
33%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC
44%No goal after half-time30%
Charleston BatteryDetroit City FC

Charleston Battery - second-half results

33% W22% R44% P
13
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Detroit City FC - second-half results

40% W50% R10% P
12
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding250%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Charleston Battery - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.80
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Detroit City FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.60
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.61.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
5
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Detroit City FC
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.38
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Detroit City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Charleston BatteryLigaDetroit City FC
Average goals per game 2.782.79 2.00
Both teams scored 33%56% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%55% 60%
Clean sheets 22%27% 50%
Goal before half-time 56%69% 50%
Goal after half-time 100%81% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.62
Home goals / game
1.17
Away goals / game
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Charleston BatteryGoalColton SwanAssist: Nathan Igor Messer
  2. Charleston BatteryGoalLangston BlackstockAssist: Colton Swan
  3. Detroit City FCYellow cardRyan Williams
  4. Charleston BatteryYellow cardMiguel Berry
  5. Detroit City FCSubstitutionOn: Benjamin MorrisOff: Maxi Rodríguez
  6. Charleston BatteryYellow cardLangston Blackstock
  7. Detroit City FCSubstitutionOn: Aedan StanleyOff: Derek Silva
  8. Charleston BatteryYellow cardEmilio Ycaza
  9. Charleston BatteryYellow cardDouglas Francisco Martìnez Juárez
  10. Detroit City FCYellow cardCallum Montgomery
  11. Detroit City FCSubstitutionOn: Rhys WilliamsOff: Alassane Ates Diouf
  12. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Andy CabreraOff: Colton Swan
  13. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Chris AllanOff: Jeremy Kelley
  14. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Alec HughesOff: Douglas Francisco Martìnez Juárez
  15. Charleston BatteryYellow cardKirill Pakhomov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Charleston Battery's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses against Detroit City FC. Games average 2.60 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.

Detroit City FC
1 : 0
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
1 : 1
Detroit City FC
Detroit City FC
1 : 3
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
2 : 2
Detroit City FC
Detroit City FC
2 : 0
Charleston Battery

FAQ

What was the result of Charleston Battery vs Detroit City FC?

The USL Championship match finished Charleston Battery 2:0 Detroit City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Charleston Battery and Detroit City FC?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Charleston Battery won 1, Detroit City FC won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Charleston Battery vs Detroit City FC?

Charleston Battery score 1.33 goals per game on average and Detroit City FC 1.20. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Charleston Battery's matches and 50% of Detroit City FC's.

What form are Charleston Battery and Detroit City FC in?

Over the last 5 games Charleston Battery have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Detroit City FC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charleston Battery vs Detroit City FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.