Charlton Athletic vs Stoke City: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, which points towards a draw. Charlton Athletic has a better home record (43% home wins) and a positive goal difference at their own stadium (+1), yet their recent form is unstable (1.4 pts/match). Stoke City presents poor away disposition – in the last 5 matches, they haven't recorded a single victory (0.6 pts/match), and 44% of away matches end without them scoring a goal. Both teams have an identical goal difference for away/home respectively (+1), and the average goal count in their matches oscillates around 1.8-2.0 goals. Given the guests' poor form and the hosts' moderate capabilities, a split of points is the most probable scenario.
Charlton Athletic vs Stoke City: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Charlton Athletic played against Stoke City in Championship (England). The game was played on February 11, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Charlton Athletic has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Stoke City has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Charlton Athletic scores 0.97 goals per game and allows 1.27. Stoke City scores 1.10 and allows 0.90. Games in this league average 2.57 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Charlton Athletic's games and 35% of Stoke City's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 39%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Stoke City has the higher season xG average, 1.28 to 1.27 per game. Charlton Athletic takes 11.2 shots per game, while Stoke City takes 11.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Charlton Athletic leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Stoke City leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.61 after halftime.
When the teams score
Charlton Athletic's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Stoke City, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Championship games average 2.57 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, which points towards a draw. Charlton Athletic has a better home record (43% home wins) and a positive goal difference at their own stadium (+1), yet their recent form is unstable (1.4 pts/match). Stoke City presents poor away disposition – in the last 5 matches, they haven't recorded a single victory (0.6 pts/match), and 44% of away matches end without them scoring a goal. Both teams have an identical goal difference for away/home respectively (+1), and the average goal count in their matches oscillates around 1.8-2.0 goals. Given the guests' poor form and the hosts' moderate capabilities, a split of points is the most probable scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Charlton Athletic | Stoke City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Charlton Athletic is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Charlton Athletic · 0.6 pts / game - Stoke City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Stoke City is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
0.97 goals / game - Charlton Athletic · 1.1 goals / game - Stoke City
Stoke City is 41% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.27 goals / game - Charlton Athletic · 0.9 goals / game - Stoke City
Charlton Athletic scores in 73% of games (22 of 30 meczów), while Stoke City keeps a clean sheet in 39% (12 of 31 meczów).
Stoke City scores in 61% of games (19 of 31 meczów), while Charlton Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Charlton Athletic
Over / Under - Stoke City
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Stoke City is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Charlton Athletic · 1.39 pts / game - Stoke City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Charlton Athletic - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Stoke City - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Charlton Athletic
Stoke City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Charlton Athletic | Liga | Stoke City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.23 | 2.57 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 56% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 50% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 25% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 71% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Charlton Athletic's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Stoke City. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Charlton Athletic vs Stoke City?
The Championship match finished Charlton Athletic 1:0 Stoke City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Charlton Athletic vs Stoke City?
Charlton Athletic score 0.97 goals per game on average and Stoke City 1.10. The Championship average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Charlton Athletic's matches and 35% of Stoke City's.
What form are Charlton Athletic and Stoke City in?
Over the last 5 games Charlton Athletic have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Stoke City 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charlton Athletic vs Stoke City?
The statistical background for Charlton Athletic vs Stoke City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.