Charlton Athletic vs Wrexham: match statistics
Wrexham has displayed significantly better form over the last five matches, averaging 2 points per game compared to Charlton Athletic's 1.2. The visitors sit 6th in the table with a positive away goal difference (+3), while the hosts are in 18th place with a neutral goal difference at home. Wrexham demonstrates higher shot conversion efficiency (16% vs 8%) and has scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches, indicating the team's offensive power. While Charlton has a decent home record (44% wins), their poor recent form (1 win in 5 matches) and low scoring output (4 goals in 5 matches) weigh against them. Considering all factors, Wrexham holds the advantage, although the similar defensive records of both teams make a draw a realistic scenario as well.
Charlton Athletic vs Wrexham: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Charlton Athletic played against Wrexham in Championship (England). The game was played on February 28, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Charlton Athletic has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Wrexham has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Charlton Athletic scores 0.97 goals per game and allows 1.26. Wrexham scores 1.56 and allows 1.32. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Charlton Athletic's games and 68% of Wrexham's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 47%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Wrexham has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.25 per game. Charlton Athletic takes 11.0 shots per game, while Wrexham takes 11.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Charlton Athletic leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Wrexham leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.88 after halftime.
When the teams score
Charlton Athletic's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Wrexham, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Championship games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wrexham has displayed significantly better form over the last five matches, averaging 2 points per game compared to Charlton Athletic's 1.2. The visitors sit 6th in the table with a positive away goal difference (+3), while the hosts are in 18th place with a neutral goal difference at home. Wrexham demonstrates higher shot conversion efficiency (16% vs 8%) and has scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches, indicating the team's offensive power. While Charlton has a decent home record (44% wins), their poor recent form (1 win in 5 matches) and low scoring output (4 goals in 5 matches) weigh against them. Considering all factors, Wrexham holds the advantage, although the similar defensive records of both teams make a draw a realistic scenario as well.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Charlton Athletic | Wrexham | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Wrexham is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Charlton Athletic · 2 pts / game - Wrexham
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wrexham is 61% better for: goals scored per game.
0.97 goals / game - Charlton Athletic · 1.56 goals / game - Wrexham
Charlton Athletic is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.26 goals / game - Charlton Athletic · 1.32 goals / game - Wrexham
Charlton Athletic scores in 76% of games (26 of 34 meczów), while Wrexham keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 meczów).
Wrexham scores in 85% of games (29 of 34 meczów), while Charlton Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 32% (11 of 34 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Charlton Athletic
Over / Under - Wrexham
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wrexham is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / game - Charlton Athletic · 1.41 pts / game - Wrexham
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Charlton Athletic - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Wrexham - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Charlton Athletic
Wrexham
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Charlton Athletic | Liga | Wrexham | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.24 | 2.60 | ▲ 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 51% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 25% | • 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 71% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 78% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Charlton Athletic's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Wrexham. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Charlton Athletic vs Wrexham?
The Championship match finished Charlton Athletic 0:1 Wrexham. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Charlton Athletic vs Wrexham?
Charlton Athletic score 0.97 goals per game on average and Wrexham 1.56. The Championship average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Charlton Athletic's matches and 68% of Wrexham's.
What form are Charlton Athletic and Wrexham in?
Over the last 5 games Charlton Athletic have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Wrexham 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charlton Athletic vs Wrexham?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.