Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II: match statistics
Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chattanooga FC played against Chicago Fire II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on June 27, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Chattanooga FC has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Chicago Fire II has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Chattanooga FC scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.73. Chicago Fire II scores 1.36 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 3.25 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Chattanooga FC's games and 64% of Chicago Fire II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 79%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chattanooga FC has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.53 per game. Chattanooga FC takes 13.5 shots per game, while Chicago Fire II takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Chattanooga FC leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. Chicago Fire II leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chattanooga FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Chicago Fire II, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS Next Pro games average 3.25 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chattanooga FC has a clear home advantage: they average 2.14 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.77, scoring 30 goals this season and 12 in the last 5 games. Chicago Fire II score only 0.86 goals on the road on average and have an xG of 1.44, with a conversion rate of 7% versus the hosts' 15%, indicating the visitors create fewer and less efficiently converted chances. Chattanooga’s defense concedes 1.29 goals at home and keeps a clean sheet in 43% of home games, while Chicago concedes 1.57 goals away and has only 14% clean sheets. The hosts average 5.71 shots on target and 14.43 shots per home match versus the visitors’ 4.29 on target and 12.43 overall, and their goal difference at home is +6 compared to Chicago’s -5 away. Although Chicago have slightly better points per game in the last 5 (1.8 vs 1.6), the aggregate offensive and defensive metrics and a high home win rate (71%) favor a Chattanooga victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show statistical tendencies to score: Chattanooga has a seasonal BTTS of 57%, while Chicago Fire II has 71%, versus a league BTTS level of 62%, which already favors a "both teams to score" scenario. In the last 5 matches both sides had BTTS at 60% and simultaneously averaged 2.4 (Chattanooga) and 2.0 (Chicago) goals — important because despite Chicago’s seasonal away average of only 0.86 goals, recent results indicate a clear offensive improvement. xG supports this picture: xG for the home side 1.63 vs xG against 1.41, and for the visitors xG for 1.44 with xG against 1.41, i.e., the model expects ~1.6 and ~1.4 xG per team which typically translates into goals on both ends. Additionally, clean sheets are rare — Chattanooga has 29% clean sheets, Chicago only 14% — and over 2.5 rates are high (86% home, 71% away), further increasing the probability of a match with goals from both sides. Considering all numbers (BTTS 57% vs 71%, last 5 matches BTTS 60%-60%, xG ~1.6 vs 1.4, low CS 29%/14%), I back BTTS "Yes" with a probability of 72% vs 28% for "No".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model based on xG and attack vs defense matchup gives 1.52 xG for Chattanooga (1.63 xG attack vs 1.41 xG Chicago defense) and 1.43 xG for Chicago (1.44 xG attack vs 1.41 xG Chattanooga defense), totaling 2.95 expected goals. Seasonally both teams have a very high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals — 86% each — and in the last 5 matches Chattanooga averaged 2.4 goals while Chicago averaged 2.0, confirming offensive form. Both sides frequently score and concede: BTTS is 57% for the home team and 71% for the away team, and the league average is 3.23 goals per match, so a scenario with at least two goals is clearly more likely. The 2.5 line is also supported (seasonal over 2.5: 86% for Chattanooga and 71% for Chicago and in the last 5 matches 60–100% on over 2.5), hence I estimate Over 2.5 at around 66%. In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (pick: Over 1.5), since both teams have 86% season matches over 1.5 and the combined xG of 2.95 points to at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Chattanooga scores on average 1.14 goals by half-time, while Chicago only 0.57, and the home side have led at the break in 4 of their matches so far (57%), indicating a clear advantage in the first 45 minutes. Over the full match Chattanooga averages 1.86 goals versus the visitors' 0.86, with xG of 1.63 versus 1.44 — this confirms better quality of created chances, further supported by a higher conversion rate of 14% versus 7%. Chicago concedes an average of 1.29 goals after the break, while Chattanooga concedes 0.86, so the hosts have a real opportunity to extend their lead in the second half. Additionally, Chattanooga wins 57% of matches compared to only 14% for Chicago, therefore the most likely and strongest scenario is a lead at the break and a win by full-time (1/1). Although Chicago averages 4.29 shots on target versus the hosts' 3.29, their lower efficiency translates those opportunities into fewer goals, which reinforces the signal to maintain Chattanooga's advantage.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chattanooga FC | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chicago Fire II is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Chattanooga FC · 1.8 pts / game - Chicago Fire II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga FC is 47% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - Chattanooga FC · 1.36 goals / game - Chicago Fire II
Chicago Fire II is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.73 goals / game - Chattanooga FC · 1.5 goals / game - Chicago Fire II
Chattanooga FC scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 meczów), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 meczów).
Chicago Fire II scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while Chattanooga FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chattanooga FC
Over / Under - Chicago Fire II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire II is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / game - Chattanooga FC · 1.71 pts / game - Chicago Fire II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chattanooga FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Chicago Fire II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 36%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +7 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chattanooga FC
Chicago Fire II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Chattanooga FC | Liga | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.73 | 3.25 | ▼ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 65% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | • 20% | 21% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 75% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Chattanooga FC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Chicago Fire II. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Chattanooga FC 2:2 Chicago Fire II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga FC and Chicago Fire II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chattanooga FC won 0, Chicago Fire II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II?
Chattanooga FC score 2.00 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire II 1.36. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Chattanooga FC's matches and 64% of Chicago Fire II's.
What form are Chattanooga FC and Chicago Fire II in?
Over the last 5 games Chattanooga FC have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Chicago Fire II 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


