United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 23 July 2026

Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II: match statistics

Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chattanooga FC play Chicago Fire II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 28 June 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Chattanooga FC: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Chicago Fire II: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chattanooga FC scores 1.84 and concedes 1.58 goals per match. Chicago Fire II scores 1.56 and concedes 1.56. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chattanooga FC 68%, Chicago Fire II 67%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga FC 58%, Chicago Fire II 83%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Chattanooga FC has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.49. Chattanooga FC: 13.7 shots per match, Chicago Fire II: 12.4.

Match halves

Chattanooga FC: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.89. Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Chattanooga FC: 31-45+ (9 goals). Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Chattanooga FC has a clear home advantage: they average 2.14 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.77, scoring 30 goals this season and 12 in the last 5 games. Chicago Fire II score only 0.86 goals on the road on average and have an xG of 1.44, with a conversion rate of 7% versus the hosts' 15%, indicating the visitors create fewer and less efficiently converted chances. Chattanooga’s defense concedes 1.29 goals at home and keeps a clean sheet in 43% of home games, while Chicago concedes 1.57 goals away and has only 14% clean sheets. The hosts average 5.71 shots on target and 14.43 shots per home match versus the visitors’ 4.29 on target and 12.43 overall, and their goal difference at home is +6 compared to Chicago’s -5 away. Although Chicago have slightly better points per game in the last 5 (1.8 vs 1.6), the aggregate offensive and defensive metrics and a high home win rate (71%) favor a Chattanooga victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
18Shots7
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
10Shots on target4
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
2.23xG1.03
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
6Corners5
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
57Dangerous attacks43
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
6Fouls6
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1Cards0
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.84Goals scored / match1.56
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.58Goals conceded / match1.56
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
46%Average possession50%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
5.58Shots on target / match4.11
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.68Shots per match12.39
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
5.58Shots on target4.11
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
13.5%Shot conversion12.6%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
46%Possession50%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.67xG for1.49
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.43xG against1.51
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Shooting quality

Chattanooga FC: Counter-attackingChicago Fire II: Balanced
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
Accuracy (shots on target)41%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire II is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.6 pts / match - Chicago Fire II

Chattanooga FC
DDWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
42% W32% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-5
1.58 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Chicago Fire II
WDDWL
Season result split
33% W28% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-7
1.28 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga FC is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.84 goals / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.56 goals / match - Chicago Fire II

Chattanooga FC scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga FC scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire II scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Chattanooga FC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).

35Goals scored (season)28
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
30Goals conceded (season)28
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
3.42Average goals in match3.11
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
6Goals scored (last 5)11
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal78%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
53%2 goals50%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
26%3 goals22%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
16%4 goals6%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal78%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
42%2 goals56%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
16%3 goals22%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
16%4 goals0%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time28%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
5%BTTS in both halves17%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
32%Scored in both halves39%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS61%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
80%BTTS - last 580%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga FC - half-time state
42% leading32% draw26% trailing
Chicago Fire II - half-time state
39% leading39% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.58Points per match (1st half)1.56
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
0.95Goals scored (1st half)0.89
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.44
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
58%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
42%No goal before half-time39%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.42Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.05Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.95Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
42%Clean sheet after half-time22%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
37%No goal after half-time44%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Chattanooga FC - second-half results

42% W16% R42% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

22% W44% R33% P
28
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chattanooga FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chicago Fire II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chattanooga FC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
9
3
31-45
7
7
46-60
4
8
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
1
16-30
10
5
31-45
7
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chattanooga FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga FCLigaChicago Fire II
Average goals in match 3.423.23 3.11
Both teams scored 68%61% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%65% 83%
Clean sheets 21%22% 22%
Goal before half-time 74%75% 78%
Goal after half-time 95%84% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Chattanooga FC 0 - 0 - 2 Chicago Fire II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Chicago Fire II
2 : 1
Chattanooga FC
Chattanooga FC
0 : 1
Chicago Fire Premier FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Chattanooga FC 2:2 Chicago Fire II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga FC and Chicago Fire II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chattanooga FC won 0, Chicago Fire II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II?

Chattanooga FC score 1.84 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire II 1.56. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Chattanooga FC's matches and 67% of Chicago Fire II's.

What form are Chattanooga FC and Chicago Fire II in?

Over the last 5 games Chattanooga FC have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Chicago Fire II 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.