United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 23 July 2026

Chattanooga FC vs Inter Miami II: match statistics

Chattanooga FC vs Inter Miami II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chattanooga FC play Inter Miami II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 5 July 2026 at 01:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Chattanooga FC: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Inter Miami II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chattanooga FC scores 1.84 and concedes 1.58 goals per match. Inter Miami II scores 0.82 and concedes 2.65. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chattanooga FC 68%, Inter Miami II 59%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga FC 58%, Inter Miami II 65%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Chattanooga FC has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.40. Chattanooga FC: 13.7 shots per match, Inter Miami II: 11.6.

Match halves

Chattanooga FC: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.89. Inter Miami II: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.41.

Goals by minute

Chattanooga FC: 31-45+ (9 goals). Inter Miami II: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 2-2-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Chattanooga FC averages 2.13 goals per home game, registers 14.88 shots with 6.25 on target and has a conversion rate of 14%, while Inter Miami II averages 1.00 goal away, with 10.63 shots of which 4.25 are on target and a 9% conversion. Defensively the visitors are very weak — Inter Miami II concedes 2.75 goals on average away, has no clean sheets (0%) and an away record of 0 wins, 4 draws and 10 losses, whereas Chattanooga win 63% of home matches and have a goal differential of +6 while conceding 1.38 on average. In the last 5 matches Chattanooga scored 13 and conceded 12, averaging 1.2 points per game, while Inter Miami scored only 3 and conceded 13, with just 0.2 points per game. From a quality-of-chances perspective the home side’s average xG at home is 1.83, and Inter Miami allows 1.93 xG on the road, which confirms that the visitors more often permit dangerous chances and less frequently create their own (their xG for away is 1.32). Based on these numbers I give a clear edge to the hosts, estimating probabilities at approximately 72% for a Chattanooga win, 18% for a draw and 10% for a visitors’ win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
10Shots14
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
4Shots on target5
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
1.31xG1.67
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
3Corners6
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
55Dangerous attacks61
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
11Fouls8
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
1Cards0
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
1.84Goals scored / match0.82
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
1.58Goals conceded / match2.65
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
46%Average possession55%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
5.58Shots on target / match4.65
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.68Shots per match11.59
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
5.58Shots on target4.65
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
13.5%Shot conversion7.1%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
46%Possession55%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
1.67xG for1.4
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
1.43xG against1.91
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

Shooting quality

Chattanooga FC: Counter-attackingInter Miami II: Balanced
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
Accuracy (shots on target)41%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.18

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga FC is 600% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Chattanooga FC · 0.2 pts / match - Inter Miami II

Chattanooga FC
DDWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
42% W32% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-5
1.58 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Inter Miami II
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W24% R76% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-13
0.24 pts / match · goal difference -31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-9
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga FC is 124% better for: goals scored per match.

1.84 goals / match - Chattanooga FC · 0.82 goals / match - Inter Miami II

Chattanooga FC is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.58 goals / match - Chattanooga FC · 2.65 goals / match - Inter Miami II

Chattanooga FC scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga FC scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

Inter Miami II scoring profile: strong

Inter Miami II scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Chattanooga FC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).

35Goals scored (season)14
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
30Goals conceded (season)45
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
3.42Average goals in match3.47
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
6Goals scored (last 5)1
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
5Goals conceded (last 5)10
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal59%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
53%2 goals12%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
26%3 goals6%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
16%4 goals6%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal94%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
42%2 goals71%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
16%3 goals59%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
16%4 goals35%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time18%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
5%BTTS in both halves12%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
32%Scored in both halves12%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
80%BTTS - last 520%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga FC is 93% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.58 pts / match - Chattanooga FC · 0.82 pts / match - Inter Miami II

Chattanooga FC - half-time state
42% leading32% draw26% trailing
Inter Miami II - half-time state
18% leading29% draw53% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.58Points per match (1st half)0.82
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
0.95Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)1.06
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.47
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
58%Clean sheet before half-time29%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
42%No goal before half-time71%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.42Points per match (2nd half)0.29
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
1.05Goals conceded (2nd half)1.59
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
1.95Average goals (2nd half)2
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
42%Clean sheet after half-time12%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II
37%No goal after half-time59%
Chattanooga FCInter Miami II

Chattanooga FC - second-half results

42% W16% R42% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter Miami II - second-half results

0% W29% R71% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-20
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chattanooga FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Inter Miami II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.40
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-4-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chattanooga FC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
9
3
31-45
7
7
46-60
4
8
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Inter Miami II
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
1
6
16-30
3
8
31-45
2
11
46-60
2
9
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chattanooga FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Inter Miami II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga FCLigaInter Miami II
Average goals in match 3.423.23 3.47
Both teams scored 68%61% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%65% 65%
Clean sheets 21%22% 6%
Goal before half-time 74%75% 82%
Goal after half-time 95%84% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Chattanooga FC 2 - 2 - 0 Inter Miami II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Inter Miami II
1 : 2
Chattanooga FC
Chattanooga FC
2 : 2
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
Chattanooga FC
3 : 3
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
1 : 2
Chattanooga FC

FAQ

What was the result of Chattanooga FC vs Inter Miami II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Chattanooga FC 1:0 Inter Miami II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga FC and Inter Miami II?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Chattanooga FC won 2, Inter Miami II won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga FC vs Inter Miami II?

Chattanooga FC score 1.84 goals per game on average and Inter Miami II 0.82. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Chattanooga FC's matches and 59% of Inter Miami II's.

What form are Chattanooga FC and Inter Miami II in?

Over the last 5 games Chattanooga FC have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Inter Miami II 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga FC vs Inter Miami II?

The statistical background for Chattanooga FC vs Inter Miami II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.