Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta: match statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chattanooga Red Wolves played against Alta in USL League One (United States). The game was played on July 15, 2026. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Chattanooga Red Wolves has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Alta has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 1.25. Alta scores 1.44 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's games and 63% of Alta's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 56%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Alta has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.52 per game. Chattanooga Red Wolves takes 12.4 shots per game, while Alta takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Chattanooga Red Wolves leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Alta leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.69 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chattanooga Red Wolves's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Alta, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL League One games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1): Chattanooga Red Wolves average 2.33 goals per home match, while Alta averages 1.00 goals on the road. The hosts defend better at their stadium — conceding 0.83 goals at home versus Alta’s 1.33 away, and Chattanooga’s clean sheet rate is 50% compared to Alta’s 33%. Chattanooga averages 13 shots per home match (4.5 on target) with an 18% conversion rate; Alta has 9.17 shots (4 on target) and an 11% conversion, indicating a clear home advantage in attacking efficiency. xG also favors the hosts: Chattanooga’s home xG is 1.62 versus Alta’s 1.22 away; over the last 5 matches both teams scored 6 goals, but the hosts have higher PPG (1.8 vs 1.6). Considering the 18% vs 11% conversion, home goal difference +9 versus Alta’s -2 away, and a lower percentage of matches without scoring (17% vs 33%), I assess probabilities as: home 62%, draw 18%, away 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I prefer 'BTTS - Yes' because seasonal BTTS rates are 60% for Chattanooga and 67% for Alta, both above the league average of 56%. xG and attacking data confirm both sides' scoring potential: projected xG in the matchup is about 1.88 for the home team ((1.71 + 2.05)/2) and 1.32 for the visitors ((1.22 + 1.41)/2), while Chattanooga averages 14.2 shots and 4.8 on target versus Alta's 9.17 and 4.0. Counterpoints are 40% clean sheets for the home side and 33% of Alta matches without scoring, however the home team fails to score in only 10% of games, so the edge favors Goal/Goal. In the last 5 matches Chattanooga has BTTS at 40% (6 scored, 5 conceded), while Alta is at 80% (6 scored, 6 conceded), further supporting both teams to score. Based on this I assess BTTS probability at 65% for 'yes' and 35% for 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model projects approximately 3.20 total goals: expected goals for the home team (Chattanooga Red Wolves) are 1.88 (attack xG 1.71 and xG conceded to Alta 2.05 → (1.71+2.05)/2=1.88), and for Alta 1.32 (attack xG 1.22 and xG conceded to Chattanooga 1.41 → (1.22+1.41)/2=1.32). With this 3.20 total, a Poisson distribution yields about an 83% probability of at least 2 goals, which is corroborated by seasonal Over1.5 rates: Chattanooga 80% and Alta 67%. The 2.5 line is moderately in favor of the over (~62%), since seasonal Over2.5 are 50% for the home side and 67% for the away side, and the league averages 2.83 goals per match. The 3.5 line has lower chances (over ~40%), therefore I recommend backing the over on 1.5 as the strongest and most likely signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis indicates Chattanooga’s attacking superiority: an average of 1.7 goals per game versus Alta’s 1.0, home xG 1.71 vs 1.22 and 14.2 shots (4.8 on target) versus 9.17 (4.0 on target) for the visitors, yielding more clear chances. However, a draw at Half-Time is common — Chattanooga were level at the break in 40% of matches, Alta in 50%, and the home side scored 16 goals by Half-Time compared to Alta’s 5, so the first half may remain balanced. Alta’s defense looks worse in xG conceded (2.05 vs 1.41 versus Chattanooga) and Alta concedes on average 1.33 goals per game, which increases the hosts’ chances of deciding the outcome in the second half. On this basis the strongest Half-Time/Full-Time scenario appears to be a draw at the break and a Chattanooga turnaround to win after 90 minutes (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Alta | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.6 pts / game - Alta
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 27% better for: goals scored per game.
1.83 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.44 goals / game - Alta
Alta is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.13 goals / game - Alta
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Alta keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).
Alta scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 meczów), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Over / Under - Alta
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.38 pts / game - Alta
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Alta - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Alta
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Liga | Alta | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.08 | 2.83 | ▼ 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 56% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▼ 56% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 25% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 81% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Chattanooga Red Wolves's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Alta. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta?
The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 1:0 Alta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga Red Wolves and Alta?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chattanooga Red Wolves won 0, Alta won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta?
Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.83 goals per game on average and Alta 1.44. The USL League One average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 63% of Alta's.
What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Alta in?
Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Alta 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta?
The statistical background for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


