United States - USL League OneDavid Stanton Field At CCSData current as of September 06, 2026

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta: match statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves crest
Chattanooga Red Wolves
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Alta crest
Alta

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chattanooga Red Wolves played against Alta in USL League One (United States). The game was played on July 15, 2026. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Chattanooga Red Wolves has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Alta has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 1.25. Alta scores 1.44 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 58% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's games and 63% of Alta's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 56%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Alta has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.52 per game. Chattanooga Red Wolves takes 12.4 shots per game, while Alta takes 12.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Chattanooga Red Wolves leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Alta leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.69 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chattanooga Red Wolves's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Alta, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL League One games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (1): Chattanooga Red Wolves average 2.33 goals per home match, while Alta averages 1.00 goals on the road. The hosts defend better at their stadium — conceding 0.83 goals at home versus Alta’s 1.33 away, and Chattanooga’s clean sheet rate is 50% compared to Alta’s 33%. Chattanooga averages 13 shots per home match (4.5 on target) with an 18% conversion rate; Alta has 9.17 shots (4 on target) and an 11% conversion, indicating a clear home advantage in attacking efficiency. xG also favors the hosts: Chattanooga’s home xG is 1.62 versus Alta’s 1.22 away; over the last 5 matches both teams scored 6 goals, but the hosts have higher PPG (1.8 vs 1.6). Considering the 18% vs 11% conversion, home goal difference +9 versus Alta’s -2 away, and a lower percentage of matches without scoring (17% vs 33%), I assess probabilities as: home 62%, draw 18%, away 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I prefer 'BTTS - Yes' because seasonal BTTS rates are 60% for Chattanooga and 67% for Alta, both above the league average of 56%. xG and attacking data confirm both sides' scoring potential: projected xG in the matchup is about 1.88 for the home team ((1.71 + 2.05)/2) and 1.32 for the visitors ((1.22 + 1.41)/2), while Chattanooga averages 14.2 shots and 4.8 on target versus Alta's 9.17 and 4.0. Counterpoints are 40% clean sheets for the home side and 33% of Alta matches without scoring, however the home team fails to score in only 10% of games, so the edge favors Goal/Goal. In the last 5 matches Chattanooga has BTTS at 40% (6 scored, 5 conceded), while Alta is at 80% (6 scored, 6 conceded), further supporting both teams to score. Based on this I assess BTTS probability at 65% for 'yes' and 35% for 'no'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model projects approximately 3.20 total goals: expected goals for the home team (Chattanooga Red Wolves) are 1.88 (attack xG 1.71 and xG conceded to Alta 2.05 → (1.71+2.05)/2=1.88), and for Alta 1.32 (attack xG 1.22 and xG conceded to Chattanooga 1.41 → (1.22+1.41)/2=1.32). With this 3.20 total, a Poisson distribution yields about an 83% probability of at least 2 goals, which is corroborated by seasonal Over1.5 rates: Chattanooga 80% and Alta 67%. The 2.5 line is moderately in favor of the over (~62%), since seasonal Over2.5 are 50% for the home side and 67% for the away side, and the league averages 2.83 goals per match. The 3.5 line has lower chances (over ~40%), therefore I recommend backing the over on 1.5 as the strongest and most likely signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis indicates Chattanooga’s attacking superiority: an average of 1.7 goals per game versus Alta’s 1.0, home xG 1.71 vs 1.22 and 14.2 shots (4.8 on target) versus 9.17 (4.0 on target) for the visitors, yielding more clear chances. However, a draw at Half-Time is common — Chattanooga were level at the break in 40% of matches, Alta in 50%, and the home side scored 16 goals by Half-Time compared to Alta’s 5, so the first half may remain balanced. Alta’s defense looks worse in xG conceded (2.05 vs 1.41 versus Chattanooga) and Alta concedes on average 1.33 goals per game, which increases the hosts’ chances of deciding the outcome in the second half. On this basis the strongest Half-Time/Full-Time scenario appears to be a draw at the break and a Chattanooga turnaround to win after 90 minutes (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

20Possession (%)80
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
7Shots24
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
3Shots on target4
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
0.85xG2.26
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
2Corners7
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
27Dangerous attacks65
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
15Fouls12
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
0Cards0
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
1.83Goals scored / game1.44
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
1.25Goals allowed / game1.13
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
39%Average possession59%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
4.42Shots on target / game4.5
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.42Shots per game12.31
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
4.42Shots on target4.5
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
14.8%Shot conversion11.7%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
39%Possession59%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
1.52xG for1.53
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
1.54xG against1.65
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

Shooting quality

Chattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attackingAlta: Balanced
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.6 pts / game - Alta

Chattanooga Red Wolves
LWWWL
Season result split
50% W8% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-5
1.58 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Alta
WWDLD
Season result split
38% W44% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-3
1.56 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 27% better for: goals scored per game.

1.83 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.44 goals / game - Alta

Alta is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.13 goals / game - Alta

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Alta keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).

Alta scoring profile: very strong

Alta scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 meczów), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).

22Goals scored (season)23
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
15Goals conceded (season)18
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
3.08Average goals per game2.56
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
8Goals scored (last 5)5
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal81%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
58%2 goals44%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
17%3 goals13%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
17%4 goals6%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal63%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
42%2 goals31%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
8%3 goals19%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
0%4 goals0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

58%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 12 meczów
56%
League average

Goal patterns

42%BTTS at half-time25%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
33%Scored in both halves31%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
60%BTTS - last 560%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
58%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.38 pts / game - Alta

Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing
Alta - half-time state
31% leading44% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)1.38
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
1.67Average goals (1st half)1.31
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
42%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
42%No goal before half-time44%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per game (2nd half)1.5
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.25
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
58%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta
42%No goal after half-time44%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAlta

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

50% W17% R33% P
18
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Alta - second-half results

31% W56% R13% P
22
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Alta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.00
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
4
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Alta
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
4
4
16-30
3
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
1
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Alta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga Red WolvesLigaAlta
Average goals per game 3.082.83 2.56
Both teams scored 58%56% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%58% 56%
Clean sheets 25%25% 38%
Goal before half-time 75%72% 75%
Goal after half-time 92%81% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.74
Home goals / game
1.09
Away goals / game
+60%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defensive advantage
+32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalKwamina Ropapa MensahAssist: Wynand Wessels
  2. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Matthew BentleyOff: Kwamina Ropapa Mensah
  3. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Aaron LombardiOff: Pedro Hernandez
  4. AltaSubstitutionOn: Ilias AoumaichOff: Santiago Higareda
  5. AltaSubstitutionOn: Steven RamosOff: Christian Ortiz

Head-to-head

Record from Chattanooga Red Wolves's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Alta. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Alta
2 : 2
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
0 : 0
Antelope Valley Alta FC
Antelope Valley Alta FC
3 : 2
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC

FAQ

What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta?

The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 1:0 Alta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga Red Wolves and Alta?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chattanooga Red Wolves won 0, Alta won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta?

Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.83 goals per game on average and Alta 1.44. The USL League One average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 63% of Alta's.

What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Alta in?

Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Alta 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta?

The statistical background for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Alta — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.