Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos: match statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chattanooga Red Wolves played against NY Cosmos in USL League One (United States). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 3:3.
Recent form
Chattanooga Red Wolves has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. NY Cosmos has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.84 goals per game and allows 1.53. NY Cosmos scores 1.05 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.91 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's games and 55% of NY Cosmos's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 70%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
NY Cosmos has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.36 per game. Chattanooga Red Wolves takes 11.2 shots per game, while NY Cosmos takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Chattanooga Red Wolves leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 1.05 goals per game after halftime. NY Cosmos leads at halftime in 10% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chattanooga Red Wolves's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). For NY Cosmos, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL League One games average 2.91 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chattanooga Red Wolves are significantly more effective at home, averaging 1.89 goals per match, while NY Cosmos score just 0.78 goals away from home. The hosts have won 67% of their home games and kept a clean sheet in 56% of them, whereas Cosmos have lost every away match, conceding an average of 2.89 goals. The difference is also reflected in their current form: Red Wolves have recorded 3 wins in their last 5 matches and scored 10 goals during that run, while the visitors have managed just 2 goals over the same period. Cosmos do have a higher away xG, 1.39 compared with the hosts’ 1.34, but they are extremely inefficient in front of goal, converting just 7% of their shots compared with 18% for Red Wolves. The visitors’ poor defensive record, with not a single clean sheet away from home, should allow the hosts to capitalize on their home advantage and secure the win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Chattanooga Red Wolves have recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.0 goals while conceding as many as 2.2. NY Cosmos have shown weaker recent attacking form, scoring just 2 goals in their last five outings and recording BTTS in 20% of matches, which clearly reduces confidence in the pick. However, the hosts have allowed opponents an xG of 1.89 over their last five league fixtures, while Cosmos create an average of 1.44 xG, giving the visitors a realistic route to scoring at least once. In addition, Cosmos have failed to keep a clean sheet in every match this season and concede an average of 2.89 goals, while Red Wolves register 5.0 shots on target per game. The hosts’ superior attacking quality, combined with their defensive vulnerability, marginally supports BTTS - Yes, although the visitors’ low recent goal output makes this a moderate-strength pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Chattanooga Red Wolves should create plenty of chances against an NY Cosmos defense that concedes an average of 2.89 goals per game and has kept no clean sheets. The hosts generate an average of 1.60 xG and 5.0 shots on target, while their opponents allow an average of 1.81 xG. The 1.5 line has been covered in 70% of the hosts’ matches and in all NY Cosmos games, while Over 2.5 goals has landed in 60% and 89% of matches, respectively. Red Wolves’ last five games produced as many as 21 goals, or 4.2 per match, although Cosmos’ scoring form is weaker at just 0.4 goals per game. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as even a limited contribution from the visitors should not be enough to halt the hosts’ attack against such a vulnerable defense.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Chattanooga Red Wolves win, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 70% of their matches, while NY Cosmos recorded a half-time draw in 60% of their last five games. The opening stages should be cautious: Red Wolves average just 0.3 goals before the break, compared with Cosmos’ 0.11, while the visitors have failed to score in the first half in each of their last five matches. After the break, the hosts’ advantage increases, as they average 0.9 goals overall and as many as 1.6 goals in the second half across their last five games. Cosmos concede an average of 1.33 goals after half-time and have lost every match played this season, allowing opponents 2.89 goals per game. In addition, Chattanooga have a higher xG of 1.60 compared with 1.39, and average 5.0 shots on target against their opponents’ 3.56, reinforcing the HT/FT turnaround scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | NY Cosmos | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 75% better for: goals scored per game.
1.84 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.05 goals / game - NY Cosmos
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.53 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 2 goals / game - NY Cosmos
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 89% of games (17 of 19 meczów), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).
NY Cosmos scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 meczów), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Over / Under - NY Cosmos
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.16 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.75 pts / game - NY Cosmos
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
NY Cosmos - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chattanooga Red Wolves
NY Cosmos
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Liga | NY Cosmos | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.37 | 2.91 | ▲ 3.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 57% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 60% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | • 26% | 25% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 70% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 79% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos?
The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 3:3 NY Cosmos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos?
Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.84 goals per game on average and NY Cosmos 1.05. The USL League One average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 55% of NY Cosmos's.
What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and NY Cosmos in?
Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and NY Cosmos 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos?
The statistical background for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


