United States - USL League OneDavid Stanton Field At CCSData current as of September 20, 2026

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Portland Hearts of Pine: match statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Portland Hearts of Pine: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chattanooga Red Wolves played against Portland Hearts of Pine in USL League One (United States). The game was played on September 19, 2026. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Chattanooga Red Wolves has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Portland Hearts of Pine has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.84 goals per game and allows 1.48. Portland Hearts of Pine scores 1.46 and allows 1.73. Games in this league average 2.96 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 64% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's games and 77% of Portland Hearts of Pine's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 65%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Portland Hearts of Pine has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.37 per game. Chattanooga Red Wolves takes 11.3 shots per game, while Portland Hearts of Pine takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Chattanooga Red Wolves leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.96 goals per game after halftime. Portland Hearts of Pine leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.96 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chattanooga Red Wolves's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). For Portland Hearts of Pine, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL League One games average 2.96 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chattanooga Red Wolves sit higher in the table, in 6th place compared with Portland Hearts of Pine in 11th, and have won 12 matches this season against their opponents’ 7 victories. At home, the hosts win 58% of their matches and score an average of 2.08 goals, while Portland win just 15% of their away games and concede as many as 2.08 goals per match. The Red Wolves’ superiority is also evident in their finishing: they convert 21% of their shots compared with the visitors’ 15%, and fail to score in only 8% of their home matches, versus 23% of Portland’s away fixtures. The visitors do have slightly more possession, 48% to 39%, but create weaker chances away from home, with an average xG of 1.22, while their defense allows opponents an xG of 2.14. Recent form is fairly similar, with Chattanooga collecting 8 points from five matches and Portland 7; however, the hosts’ significantly stronger home statistics point to a Chattanooga victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for goals from both sides is very strong, as both Chattanooga Red Wolves and Portland Hearts of Pine have recorded BTTS in 77% of their matches, compared with the league average of 60%. Over their last five matches, this figure has risen to 80% for both teams, while they conceded an average of 1.6 and 1.8 goals, respectively. The hosts score an average of 1.46 goals, while Portland concede as many as 2.08 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in only 8% of their appearances. The visitors have a lower attacking potential, with an average xG of 1.22, but Chattanooga allow opponents an xG of 1.60, rising to 2.03 over their last five matches. The most likely scenario is therefore that the hosts will exploit Portland’s defensive weakness, while the visitors will find at least one goal against the vulnerable Red Wolves defense.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have surpassed the 1.5-goal mark in 85% of their matches this season, creating a very strong signal for at least two goals. Chattanooga average 1.46 goals per game, while Portland concede as many as 2.08 per match, with the hosts’ average xG standing at 1.66 compared to the 2.14 xG allowed by their opponents. Portland score an average of 1.46 goals, while Chattanooga’s defense allows opponents 1.60 xG, meaning the visitors should also create genuine scoring opportunities. In their last five matches, the teams averaged 3.6 total goals each, and in both cases, 60% of those games finished Over 2.5 goals. However, the safest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as the low line is supported by both full-season statistics and the high 77% rate of matches in which both teams scored.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is Chattanooga Red Wolves leading at the break and securing the win after the final whistle, as the hosts were ahead at half-time in 80% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 1.2 goals during that period. Over the same timeframe, Portland Hearts of Pine scored just 0.4 goals before the break, while across the season they failed to score in the first half in 75% of their matches. The hosts possess greater attacking potential: their average xG stands at 1.66 compared with 1.22 for the visitors, and they also average 14.15 shots per match versus 9.85 for their opponents. Portland’s defense concedes an average of 2.08 goals per match and allows an xG of 2.14, which favors the Red Wolves maintaining their lead. Caution is warranted because both teams have scored and conceded in 77% of their league matches, making a draw at half-time followed by a home win a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
13Shots9
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
5Shots on target2
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.62xG0.98
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
10Corners4
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
63Dangerous attacks37
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
15Fouls9
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
2Cards0
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.84Goals scored / game1.46
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.48Goals allowed / game1.73
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
38%Average possession51%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
4.08Shots on target / game4
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.32Shots per game12
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
4.08Shots on target4
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
16.3%Shot conversion12.2%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
38%Possession51%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.37xG for1.44
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.73xG against1.87
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Shooting quality

Chattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attackingPortland Hearts of Pine: Balanced
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.4 pts / game - Portland Hearts of Pine

Chattanooga Red Wolves
LWWDW
Season result split
52% W12% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-3-9
1.68 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Portland Hearts of Pine
DLLWW
Season result split
27% W31% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-11
1.12 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-6
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

1.84 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.46 goals / game - Portland Hearts of Pine

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.48 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.73 goals / game - Portland Hearts of Pine

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 92% of games (23 of 25 games), while Portland Hearts of Pine keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 games).

Portland Hearts of Pine scoring profile: very strong

Portland Hearts of Pine scores in 81% of games (21 of 26 games), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 games).

46Goals scored (season)38
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
37Goals conceded (season)45
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
3.32Average goals per game3.19
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal81%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
56%2 goals38%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
20%3 goals19%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
12%4 goals4%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal88%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
44%2 goals50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
24%3 goals23%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
4%4 goals8%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

64%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 25 games
77%
Portland Hearts of Pine - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.20 of 26 games
60%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time8%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
28%Scored in both halves15%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
60%BTTS - last 580%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.48 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.08 pts / game - Portland Hearts of Pine

Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
40% leading28% draw32% trailing
Portland Hearts of Pine - half-time state
23% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per game (1st half)1.08
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.68Average goals (1st half)0.92
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
44%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
40%No goal before half-time69%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per game (2nd half)1.04
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
0.96Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.64Average goals (2nd half)2.04
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
52%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
40%No goal after half-time38%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

40% W28% D32% L
37
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Portland Hearts of Pine - second-half results

19% W46% D35% L
28
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.400.80
Goals scored / game1.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Portland Hearts of Pine - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.02.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
8
10
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
7
31-45
12
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Portland Hearts of Pine
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
2
6
16-30
4
5
31-45
8
5
46-60
3
9
61-75
14
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Portland Hearts of Pine

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga Red WolvesLigaPortland Hearts of Pine
Average goals per game 3.322.96 3.19
Both teams scored 64%60% 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%59% 65%
Clean sheets 28%23% 12%
Goal before half-time 84%73% 65%
Goal after half-time 84%81% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / game
1.21
Away goals / game
+45%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defensive advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Portland Hearts of PineSubstitutionOn: Felipe Rodriguez-GentileOff: Ollie Wright
  2. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardMichael Knapp
  3. Portland Hearts of PineGoalFelipe Rodriguez-GentileAssist: Matteo Kidd
  4. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Wynand WesselsOff: Michael Knapp
  5. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Aaron LombardiOff: Matthew Bentley
  6. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Dyson ClapierOff: James Vaughan
  7. Portland Hearts of PineSubstitutionOn: Diego LetayfOff: Aboubacar Camara
  8. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardWynand Wessels
  9. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalOmar HernandezAssist: Omar Gómez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Chattanooga Red Wolves's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Portland Hearts of Pine. Games average 2.25 goals, and both teams scored in 75% of them.

Portland Hearts of Pine
1 : 2
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
0 : 1
Portland Hearts of Pine SC
Portland Hearts of Pine SC
1 : 1
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
2 : 1
Portland Hearts of Pine SC

FAQ

What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Portland Hearts of Pine?

The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 1:1 Portland Hearts of Pine. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga Red Wolves and Portland Hearts of Pine?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Chattanooga Red Wolves won 2, Portland Hearts of Pine won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Portland Hearts of Pine?

Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.84 goals per game on average and Portland Hearts of Pine 1.46. The USL League One average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 77% of Portland Hearts of Pine's.

What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Portland Hearts of Pine in?

Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Portland Hearts of Pine 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Portland Hearts of Pine?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.