Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers: match statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chattanooga Red Wolves play Richmond Kickers in USL League One (United States). The match date is 28 May 2026 at 01:00. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 5:0.
Current form
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Richmond Kickers: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.93 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Richmond Kickers scores 0.71 and concedes 1.88. League average: 2.85 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 57%, Richmond Kickers 35%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 64%, Richmond Kickers 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Chattanooga Red Wolves has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.24. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 12.5 shots per match, Richmond Kickers: 10.1.
Match halves
Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.07. Richmond Kickers: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.29.
Goals by minute
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (7 goals). Richmond Kickers: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
The match favorite is Chattanooga Red Wolves: their home average xG is 1.66 versus Richmond’s 1.04 on the road, and the hosts average 11.5 shots and 5.0 on target per game compared to 8.25 and 3.0 for the visitors. This translates into an average of 2.0 goals for Chattanooga at home versus 1.25 for Richmond away, and a lower goals conceded average for the hosts (1.0 vs 1.25 away). At the same time Richmond shows better recent points form and efficiency — 3 wins and 7 goals in their last 5 matches and 1.8 points per game, versus 1 win, 6 goals and 0.8 points for Chattanooga. Also note the risk for the hosts: Chattanooga failed to score in 50% of their home matches, while Richmond were goalless on the road in only 25% of games. Considering the higher quality of chance creation by the hosts (xG 1.66, 11.5 shots) alongside the visitors’ superior form, I assign Chattanooga a 50% chance, a draw 20% and Richmond 30% for the final result.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Richmond Kickers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 1100% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.2 pts / match - Richmond Kickers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 172% better for: goals scored per match.
1.93 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.71 goals / match - Richmond Kickers
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 55% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.21 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.88 goals / match - Richmond Kickers
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).
Richmond Kickers scores in 47% of matches (8 of 17 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Chattanooga Red Wolves
Over / Under — Richmond Kickers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.88 pts / match - Richmond Kickers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Richmond Kickers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Richmond Kickers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Liga | Richmond Kickers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.14 | 2.85 | ▼ 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 55% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 58% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 26% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 80% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Chattanooga Red Wolves 1 - 1 - 0 Richmond Kickers. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers?
The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 5:0 Richmond Kickers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga Red Wolves and Richmond Kickers?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chattanooga Red Wolves won 1, Richmond Kickers won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers?
Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.93 goals per game on average and Richmond Kickers 0.71. The USL League One average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 35% of Richmond Kickers's.
What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Richmond Kickers in?
Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Richmond Kickers 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers?
The statistical background for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Richmond Kickers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.