United States - USL League OneDavid Stanton Field At CCSData current as of October 17, 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity: match statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves crest
Chattanooga Red Wolves
vs
Spokane Velocity crest
Spokane Velocity

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chattanooga Red Wolves plays Spokane Velocity in USL League One (United States). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS.

Recent form

Chattanooga Red Wolves has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Spokane Velocity has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.74 goals per game and allows 1.44. Spokane Velocity scores 1.48 and allows 1.32. Games in this league average 2.97 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's games and 56% of Spokane Velocity's. The Over 2.5 rates are 59% and 64%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Spokane Velocity has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.42 per game. Chattanooga Red Wolves takes 11.6 shots per game, while Spokane Velocity takes 12.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Chattanooga Red Wolves leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. Spokane Velocity leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.80 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chattanooga Red Wolves's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). For Spokane Velocity, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL League One games average 2.97 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.59Points per gamePPG - points per game.1.72
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.74Goals scored / game1.48
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.44Goals allowed / game1.32
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.42xG forxG - expected goals, the quality of scoring chances.1.46
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
40%Average possession51%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4.19Shots on target / game3.88
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
26%Clean sheetsClean sheet - a match with no goal conceded.24%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
63%Both teams scoredBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.56%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.63Shots per game12.24
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4.19Shots on target3.88
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
15%Shot conversion12.1%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
40%Possession51%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.42xG for1.46
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.69xG against1.4
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Shooting quality

Chattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attackingSpokane Velocity: Balanced
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
WDWDL
Season result split
48% W15% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-10
1.59 pts / game · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Spokane Velocity
WDLDW
Season result split
52% W16% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-8
1.72 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.74 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.48 goals / game - Spokane Velocity

Spokane Velocity is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.44 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.32 goals / game - Spokane Velocity

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 89% of games (24 of 27 games), while Spokane Velocity keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 games).

Spokane Velocity scoring profile: very strong

Spokane Velocity scores in 76% of games (19 of 25 games), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 games).

47Goals scored (season)37
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
39Goals conceded (season)33
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
3.19Average goals per game2.8
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
Chattanooga Red Wolves
26%
Clean sheetsClean sheet - a match with no goal conceded.7 of 27 games
11%
No goalFailed to score - a match where the team did not score.3 of 27 games
Spokane Velocity
24%
Clean sheetsClean sheet - a match with no goal conceded.6 of 25 games
24%
No goalFailed to score - a match where the team did not score.6 of 25 games

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal76%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
52%2 goals48%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
19%3 goals24%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
11%4 goals0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal76%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
41%2 goals28%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
22%3 goals20%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4%4 goals8%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 27 games
56%
Spokane Velocity - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 25 games
61%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time16%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
26%Scored in both halves24%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
60%BTTS - last 580%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

100%Min. 1 goal (Over 0.5)Over 0.5 - at least one goal in the match.96%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
74%Min. 2 goals (Over 1.5)Over 1.5 - at least two goals in the match.76%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
59%Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)Over 2.5 - at least three goals in the match.64%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
41%Min. 4 goals (Over 3.5)Over 3.5 - at least four goals in the match.40%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
30%Min. 5 goals (Over 4.5)Over 4.5 - at least five goals in the match.4%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Line 0.5 (min. 1 goal)Over 0.5 - at least one goal in the match.
Over 100%Under 0%
Line 1.5 (min. 2 goals)Over 1.5 - at least two goals in the match.
Over 74%Under 26%
Line 2.5 (min. 3 goals)Over 2.5 - at least three goals in the match.
Over 59%Under 41%
Line 3.5 (min. 4 goals)Over 3.5 - at least four goals in the match.
Over 41%Under 59%
Line 4.5 (min. 5 goals)Over 4.5 - at least five goals in the match.
Over 30%Under 70%

Over / Under - Spokane Velocity

Line 0.5 (min. 1 goal)Over 0.5 - at least one goal in the match.
Over 96%Under 4%
Line 1.5 (min. 2 goals)Over 1.5 - at least two goals in the match.
Over 76%Under 24%
Line 2.5 (min. 3 goals)Over 2.5 - at least three goals in the match.
Over 64%Under 36%
Line 3.5 (min. 4 goals)Over 3.5 - at least four goals in the match.
Over 40%Under 60%
Line 4.5 (min. 5 goals)Over 4.5 - at least five goals in the match.
Over 4%Under 96%

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
37% leading26% draw37% trailing
Spokane Velocity - half-time state
36% leading32% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.37Points per game (1st half)1.4
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.68
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)0.72
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.63Average goals (1st half)1.4
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
41%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
44%No goal before half-time56%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per game (2nd half)1.52
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
56%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
41%No goal after half-time44%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

41% W30% D30% L
37
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Spokane Velocity - second-half results

44% W20% D36% L
35
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.20
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Spokane Velocity - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.60
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game1.20.2
Average goals per game1.61.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference-4+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
8
10
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
9
31-45
12
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Spokane Velocity
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
7
3
16-30
6
7
31-45
7
6
46-60
8
2
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.99
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Spokane Velocity

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga Red WolvesLigaSpokane Velocity
Average goals per game▲ 3.192.97▼ 2.80
Both teams scored▲ 63%61%▼ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 59%60%▲ 64%
Clean sheets▲ 26%23%• 24%
Goal before half-time▲ 85%74%▲ 76%
Goal after half-time• 81%81%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.97
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / game
1.21
Away goals / game
+45%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defensive advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Home managerScott MacKenzieAway managerLeigh Veidman

Head-to-head

Record from Chattanooga Red Wolves's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Spokane Velocity. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Spokane Velocity FC
1 : 2
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
3 : 0
Spokane Velocity FC