Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity: match statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chattanooga Red Wolves plays Spokane Velocity in USL League One (United States). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS.
Recent form
Chattanooga Red Wolves has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Spokane Velocity has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.90 goals per game and allows 1.67. Spokane Velocity scores 1.52 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.96 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's games and 52% of Spokane Velocity's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 67%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Spokane Velocity has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.34 per game. Chattanooga Red Wolves takes 10.9 shots per game, while Spokane Velocity takes 12.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Chattanooga Red Wolves leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 1.10 goals per game after halftime. Spokane Velocity leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chattanooga Red Wolves's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). For Spokane Velocity, it is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL League One games average 2.96 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Spokane Velocity | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Spokane Velocity is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 2.4 pts / game - Spokane Velocity
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
1.9 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.52 goals / game - Spokane Velocity
Spokane Velocity is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.29 goals / game - Spokane Velocity
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 90% of games (19 of 21 meczów), while Spokane Velocity keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 meczów).
Spokane Velocity scores in 71% of games (15 of 21 meczów), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Over / Under - Spokane Velocity
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Spokane Velocity is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.19 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.62 pts / game - Spokane Velocity
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Spokane Velocity - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Spokane Velocity
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Liga | Spokane Velocity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.57 | 2.96 | ▼ 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 59% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 61% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | • 24% | 23% | • 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 73% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 81% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Chattanooga Red Wolves's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Spokane Velocity. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.