China - Chinese Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Jonoon: match statistics

170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Chengdu Better City FC shows a decisive advantage as the league leaders with a 100% win rate in home matches, having won their only game so far 5:1. The hosts dominate in terms of ball possession (79%) and offensive efficiency, averaging 5 goals per home match with an impressive xG of 3.2. Qingdao Jonoon finds themselves in a difficult situation in 13th place with zero away efficiency (0% wins, 100% losses), conceding an average of 3 goals per away match. The significant difference in play quality, confirmed by xG metrics (3.2 vs 1.49) and shooting accuracy (17% vs 7%), strongly favors the hosts. Taking into account all statistical parameters, especially Chengdu's dominance at home and Qingdao's very poor away form, a home win is the most probable scenario for this fixture.

Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Jonoon: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chengdu Better City FC play Qingdao Jonoon in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 15 March 2026 at 12:35. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Chengdu Better City FC: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Qingdao Jonoon: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chengdu Better City FC scores 2.05 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. Qingdao Jonoon scores 1.58 and concedes 1.89. League average: 3.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chengdu Better City FC 58%, Qingdao Jonoon 74%. Over 2.5: Chengdu Better City FC 53%, Qingdao Jonoon 63%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Chengdu Better City FC has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.33. Chengdu Better City FC: 14.8 shots per match, Qingdao Jonoon: 12.2.

Match halves

Chengdu Better City FC: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.21. Qingdao Jonoon: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Chengdu Better City FC: 76-90+ (15 goals). Qingdao Jonoon: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-2-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Chengdu Better City FC shows a decisive advantage as the league leaders with a 100% win rate in home matches, having won their only game so far 5:1. The hosts dominate in terms of ball possession (79%) and offensive efficiency, averaging 5 goals per home match with an impressive xG of 3.2. Qingdao Jonoon finds themselves in a difficult situation in 13th place with zero away efficiency (0% wins, 100% losses), conceding an average of 3 goals per away match. The significant difference in play quality, confirmed by xG metrics (3.2 vs 1.49) and shooting accuracy (17% vs 7%), strongly favors the hosts. Taking into account all statistical parameters, especially Chengdu's dominance at home and Qingdao's very poor away form, a home win is the most probable scenario for this fixture.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
16Shots11
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
8Shots on target1
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
1.97xG1.15
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
4Corners8
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
54Dangerous attacks52
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
11Fouls17
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
1Cards1
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
2.05Goals scored / match1.58
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
0.95Goals conceded / match1.89
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
57%Average possession45%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
5.11Shots on target / match4.05
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.79Shots per match12.16
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
5.11Shots on target4.05
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
13.9%Shot conversion13%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
57%Possession45%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
1.72xG for1.33
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
1.16xG against1.69
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

Shooting quality

Chengdu Better City FC: DominantQingdao Jonoon: Counter-attacking
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chengdu Better City FC is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 0.8 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon

Chengdu Better City FC
WWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
68% W21% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-2
2.26 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Qingdao Jonoon
LWDLL
Season result split
32% W16% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-10
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chengdu Better City FC is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

2.05 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.58 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon

Chengdu Better City FC is 99% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.95 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.89 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon

Chengdu Better City FC scoring profile: very strong

Chengdu Better City FC scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Qingdao Jonoon keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

Qingdao Jonoon scoring profile: very strong

Qingdao Jonoon scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).

39Goals scored (season)30
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
18Goals conceded (season)36
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
3Average goals in match3.47
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
7Goals scored (last 5)10
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
5Goals conceded (last 5)14
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal79%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
53%2 goals42%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
37%3 goals26%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
16%4 goals11%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal89%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
21%2 goals47%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
5%3 goals32%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
0%4 goals16%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
Chengdu Better City FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 19 matches
65%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time5%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
42%Scored in both halves21%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time68%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time42%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chengdu Better City FC is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.68 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.32 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon

Chengdu Better City FC - half-time state
42% leading42% draw16% trailing
Qingdao Jonoon - half-time state
32% leading37% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.68Points per match (1st half)1.32
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
0.84Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
1.16Average goals (1st half)1.26
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
74%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
47%No goal before half-time68%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

After half-time (2nd half)

2.05Points per match (2nd half)1.37
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
1.21Goals scored (2nd half)1
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)1.21
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
1.84Average goals (2nd half)2.21
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
58%Clean sheet after half-time21%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon
21%No goal after half-time32%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Jonoon

Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results

63% W16% R21% P
32
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qingdao Jonoon - second-half results

32% W42% R26% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chengdu Better City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Qingdao Jonoon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.6
Average goals in match2.02.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chengdu Better City FC
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
8
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
15
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Qingdao Jonoon
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
2
7
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
11
46-60
7
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-69%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chengdu Better City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Qingdao Jonoon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Chengdu Better City FCLigaQingdao Jonoon
Average goals in match 3.003.09 3.47
Both teams scored 58%65% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%59% 63%
Clean sheets 32%19% 11%
Goal before half-time 63%70% 63%
Goal after half-time 95%89% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Chengdu Better City FC 1 - 2 - 0 Qingdao Jonoon. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Qingdao Jonoon
1 : 1
Chengdu Better City FC
Chengdu Better City FC
0 : 0
Qingdao Jonoon FC
Qingdao Jonoon FC
0 : 1
Chengdu Better City FC

FAQ

What was the result of Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Jonoon?

The Chinese Super League match finished Chengdu Better City FC 1:0 Qingdao Jonoon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City FC and Qingdao Jonoon?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chengdu Better City FC won 1, Qingdao Jonoon won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Chengdu Better City FC score 2.05 goals per game on average and Qingdao Jonoon 1.58. The Chinese Super League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Chengdu Better City FC's matches and 74% of Qingdao Jonoon's.

What form are Chengdu Better City FC and Qingdao Jonoon in?

Over the last 5 games Chengdu Better City FC have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Qingdao Jonoon 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Jonoon: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.