China - Chinese Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Youth Island: match statistics

Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Youth Island: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chengdu Better City FC play Qingdao Youth Island in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 3 April 2026 at 13:35. Final score: 5:1.

Current form

Chengdu Better City FC: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Qingdao Youth Island: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chengdu Better City FC scores 2.05 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. Qingdao Youth Island scores 1.21 and concedes 1.53. League average: 3.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chengdu Better City FC 58%, Qingdao Youth Island 74%. Over 2.5: Chengdu Better City FC 53%, Qingdao Youth Island 42%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Chengdu Better City FC has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.22. Chengdu Better City FC: 14.8 shots per match, Qingdao Youth Island: 10.6.

Match halves

Chengdu Better City FC: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.21. Qingdao Youth Island: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Chengdu Better City FC: 76-90+ (15 goals). Qingdao Youth Island: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-3-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Chengdu Better City holds a clear home advantage: 100% home wins, averaging 3.0 goals scored and only 0.5 conceded per match, with two recent home victories (ww). Qingdao Youth Island struggle away — 100% defeats, averaging 0.5 goals scored and 3.0 conceded per match and 50% of away games without scoring. The gap in chance creation is significant: Chengdu averages 22.5 shots (8.0 on target) and xG 2.58, while the visitors average 13.5 shots (3.5 on target) and xG 1.34. Match control is reinforced by 70% possession versus 37% and a higher shot efficiency — conversion 13% versus Qingdao’s 4% — indicating the hosts will create and convert more opportunities. Based on these figures I expect a home win.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
14Shots9
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
8Shots on target1
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
1.75xG0.88
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
6Corners3
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
42Dangerous attacks32
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
14Fouls18
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
1Cards1
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
2.05Goals scored / match1.21
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
0.95Goals conceded / match1.53
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
57%Average possession43%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
5.11Shots on target / match3.58
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.79Shots per match10.58
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
5.11Shots on target3.58
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
13.9%Shot conversion11.4%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
57%Possession43%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
1.72xG for1.22
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
1.16xG against1.55
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

Shooting quality

Chengdu Better City FC: DominantQingdao Youth Island: Balanced
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
Accuracy (shots on target)35%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chengdu Better City FC is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.6 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island

Chengdu Better City FC
WWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
68% W21% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-2
2.26 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Qingdao Youth Island
DWWLD
Season result split
26% W53% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-4
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chengdu Better City FC is 69% better for: goals scored per match.

2.05 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.21 goals / match - Qingdao Youth Island

Chengdu Better City FC is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.95 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.53 goals / match - Qingdao Youth Island

Chengdu Better City FC scoring profile: very strong

Chengdu Better City FC scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Qingdao Youth Island keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

Qingdao Youth Island scoring profile: very strong

Qingdao Youth Island scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).

39Goals scored (season)23
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
18Goals conceded (season)29
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
3Average goals in match2.74
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
7Goals scored (last 5)8
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal79%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
53%2 goals26%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
37%3 goals16%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
16%4 goals0%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal84%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
21%2 goals37%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
5%3 goals16%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
0%4 goals11%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
Chengdu Better City FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 19 matches
74%
Qingdao Youth Island - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 19 matches
65%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time26%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
0%BTTS in both halves11%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
42%Scored in both halves21%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
80%BTTS - last 580%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chengdu Better City FC is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.68 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.37 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island

Chengdu Better City FC - half-time state
42% leading42% draw16% trailing
Qingdao Youth Island - half-time state
26% leading58% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.68Points per match (1st half)1.37
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
0.84Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
1.16Average goals (1st half)1.11
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
74%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
47%No goal before half-time47%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

After half-time (2nd half)

2.05Points per match (2nd half)1.05
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
1.21Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.95
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
1.84Average goals (2nd half)1.63
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
58%Clean sheet after half-time37%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island
21%No goal after half-time53%
Chengdu Better City FCQingdao Youth Island

Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results

63% W16% R21% P
32
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qingdao Youth Island - second-half results

21% W42% R37% P
26
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chengdu Better City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Qingdao Youth Island - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chengdu Better City FC
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
8
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
15
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Qingdao Youth Island
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
5
31-45
3
3
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chengdu Better City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Qingdao Youth Island

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Chengdu Better City FCLigaQingdao Youth Island
Average goals in match 3.003.09 2.74
Both teams scored 58%65% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%59% 42%
Clean sheets 32%19% 16%
Goal before half-time 63%70% 68%
Goal after half-time 95%89% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Chengdu Better City FC 0 - 3 - 0 Qingdao Youth Island. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Qingdao Youth Island
1 : 1
Chengdu Better City FC
Qingdao Youth Island FC
2 : 2
Chengdu Better City FC
Chengdu Better City FC
1 : 1
Qingdao Youth Island FC

FAQ

What was the result of Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Youth Island?

The Chinese Super League match finished Chengdu Better City FC 5:1 Qingdao Youth Island. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City FC and Qingdao Youth Island?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chengdu Better City FC won 0, Qingdao Youth Island won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Youth Island?

Chengdu Better City FC score 2.05 goals per game on average and Qingdao Youth Island 1.21. The Chinese Super League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Chengdu Better City FC's matches and 74% of Qingdao Youth Island's.

What form are Chengdu Better City FC and Qingdao Youth Island in?

Over the last 5 games Chengdu Better City FC have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Qingdao Youth Island 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Youth Island?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.