South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa: match statistics

Cheongju crest
Cheongju
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Asan Mugunghwa crest
Asan Mugunghwa

Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cheongju play Asan Mugunghwa in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Cheongju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Asan Mugunghwa: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cheongju scores 1.18 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Asan Mugunghwa scores 1.41 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cheongju 76%, Asan Mugunghwa 59%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 53%, Asan Mugunghwa 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Cheongju has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.41. Cheongju: 11.3 shots per match, Asan Mugunghwa: 10.9.

Match halves

Cheongju: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.65. Asan Mugunghwa: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Cheongju: 76-90+ (6 goals). Asan Mugunghwa: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Asan Mugunghwa sit 7th in the table while Cheongju are 13th and have 3 wins this season versus 0 for the hosts. In the last 5 matches Cheongju scored 5 goals and have a 0-4-1 record (0.8 pts per match), whereas Asan scored 8 goals and are 2-2-1 (1.6 pts per match). At home Cheongju average 15.75 shots (5 on target) but convert only 6% and register 1.0 goal with an xG of 1.77; Asan away average 11.5 shots (4 on target), 17% conversion and 2.0 goals with xG 1.65 — the visitors are therefore markedly more efficient with fewer attempts. Defensively Cheongju concede 2.0 goals at home with xG against 1.14, while Asan concede 1.5 goals away with xG against 1.2; both teams have 0% clean sheets and 0% matches without conceding, which favors a high-scoring game. Considering the visitors’ superior finishing (17% vs 6%), higher recent points average (1.6 vs 0.8) and Cheongju’s lack of home wins, I forecast an Asan Mugunghwa victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
10Shots10
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1Shots on target4
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.24xG1.35
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
6Corners6
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
74Dangerous attacks61
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
12Fouls13
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
3Cards4
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.18Goals scored / match1.41
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.59Goals conceded / match1.18
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
55%Average possession50%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
3.88Shots on target / match4.35
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.35Shots per match10.94
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
3.88Shots on target4.35
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
10.4%Shot conversion12.9%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
55%Possession50%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.42xG for1.41
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.31xG against1.37
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Shooting quality

Cheongju: BalancedAsan Mugunghwa: Balanced
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
Accuracy (shots on target)34%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Asan Mugunghwa is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.6 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Cheongju
LWLDW
Season result split
12% W65% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Asan Mugunghwa
WDWDL
Season result split
35% W35% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-5
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Asan Mugunghwa is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.41 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Asan Mugunghwa is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.18 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Cheongju scoring profile: very strong

Cheongju scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Asan Mugunghwa keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Asan Mugunghwa scoring profile: very strong

Asan Mugunghwa scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

20Goals scored (season)24
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
27Goals conceded (season)20
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
2.76Average goals in match2.59
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
7Goals scored (last 5)7
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal76%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
35%2 goals47%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0%3 goals18%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0%4 goals0%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal71%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
47%2 goals35%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
18%3 goals12%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
12%4 goals0%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time29%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
6%BTTS in both halves12%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
24%Scored in both halves24%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
80%BTTS - last 560%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cheongju is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Cheongju · 1 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Cheongju - half-time state
29% leading41% draw29% trailing
Asan Mugunghwa - half-time state
18% leading47% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.53
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.76
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.12Average goals (1st half)1.29
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
53%Clean sheet before half-time47%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
47%No goal before half-time53%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)1.59
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.41
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.29
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
41%Clean sheet after half-time59%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
47%No goal after half-time47%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Cheongju - second-half results

18% W41% R41% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding41%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Asan Mugunghwa - second-half results

35% W53% R12% P
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cheongju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Asan Mugunghwa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cheongju
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Asan Mugunghwa
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
6
31-45
6
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.68
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cheongju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Asan Mugunghwa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

CheongjuLigaAsan Mugunghwa
Average goals in match 2.762.75 2.59
Both teams scored 76%61% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 53%
Clean sheets 24%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 76%73% 71%
Goal after half-time 71%76% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Cheongju 0 - 1 - 2 Asan Mugunghwa. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Asan Mugunghwa FC
0 : 0
Cheongju FC
Cheongju FC
0 : 2
Asan Mugunghwa FC
Asan Mugunghwa FC
3 : 1
Cheongju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa?

The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 0:0 Asan Mugunghwa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cheongju and Asan Mugunghwa?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cheongju won 0, Asan Mugunghwa won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa?

Cheongju score 1.18 goals per game on average and Asan Mugunghwa 1.41. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Cheongju's matches and 59% of Asan Mugunghwa's.

What form are Cheongju and Asan Mugunghwa in?

Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Asan Mugunghwa 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa?

The statistical background for Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.