Cheongju vs Daegu: match statistics
Cheongju vs Daegu: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cheongju play Daegu in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 4 July 2026 at 12:30. Venue: Cheongju Stadium. Final score: 1:5.
Current form
Cheongju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Daegu: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cheongju scores 1.18 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Daegu scores 2.12 and concedes 1.35. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cheongju 76%, Daegu 71%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 53%, Daegu 65%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Daegu has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.42. Cheongju: 11.2 shots per match, Daegu: 13.8.
Match halves
Cheongju: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.65. Daegu: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.29.
Goals by minute
Cheongju: 76-90+ (6 goals). Daegu: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I predict a Daegu win ('2') — the visitors have 7 wins, 4 draws and 3 losses this season, while Cheongju have only 1 win, 10 draws and 3 losses. In the last 5 matches Daegu scored 9 goals with a 3-2-0 record, whereas Cheongju scored 6 goals, failed to win and are 0–3–2, highlighting a clear difference in form momentum. Offensively, Daegu away average 1.83 goals with xG 1.72 and 5.17 shots on target, while Cheongju at home average 1.00 goal per game with xG 1.60 and 4.14 shots on target; a conversion rate of 15% versus 8% further favors the visitors. Defensively, Cheongju concede 1.71 goals at home on average and have allowed 8 goals in the last 5 matches, while Daegu concede 1.5 goals away and only 2 goals in their last 5 fixtures, indicating greater defensive stability for the visitors. Cheongju also have a 0% win rate and 57% draws in home matches and average 0.6 points per game in the last 5 matches versus 2.2 points per game for Daegu, therefore I assess win probability as: Daegu 65%, draw 25%, Cheongju 10%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cheongju | Daegu | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Daegu is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Cheongju · 2.2 pts / match - Daegu
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Daegu is 80% better for: goals scored per match.
1.18 goals / match - Cheongju · 2.12 goals / match - Daegu
Daegu is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.59 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.35 goals / match - Daegu
Cheongju scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Daegu keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Daegu scores in 94% of matches (16 of 17 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Cheongju
Over / Under — Daegu
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Daegu is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.53 pts / match - Daegu
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Daegu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cheongju
Daegu
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Cheongju | Liga | Daegu | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.76 | 2.75 | ▲ 3.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 76% | 61% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | • 24% | 24% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Cheongju vs Daegu?
The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 1:5 Daegu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Daegu?
Cheongju score 1.18 goals per game on average and Daegu 2.12. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Cheongju's matches and 71% of Daegu's.
What form are Cheongju and Daegu in?
Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Daegu 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Daegu?
The statistical background for Cheongju vs Daegu — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.