Cheongju vs Gimhae City: match statistics
Cheongju vs Gimhae City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cheongju play Gimhae City in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Cheongju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Gimhae City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cheongju scores 1.18 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Gimhae City scores 0.81 and concedes 2.06. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cheongju 76%, Gimhae City 69%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 53%, Gimhae City 56%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Cheongju has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.21. Cheongju: 11.3 shots per match, Gimhae City: 9.3.
Match halves
Cheongju: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.65. Gimhae City: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Cheongju: 76-90+ (6 goals). Gimhae City: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I back the home win (1): Cheongju creates significantly more chances and has a higher xG — averaging 14.67 shots per home match versus 7.67 shots for the visitors away and xG 1.56 vs 1.05. The hosts have scored 9 goals this season (avg. 1.00 per home match) and have netted 6 in their last 5, while Gimhae have 4 goals this season and only 3 in their last 5, which indicates Cheongju’s offensive superiority. Form also favors the hosts: Cheongju have drawn 4 of their last 5 and average 0.8 points per match in that period, whereas Gimhae have lost 4 of 5 and average just 0.2 points per match. Both defenses are prone to conceding — Cheongju concede 2.33 goals on average at home, Gimhae 2.00 away, both teams have 0% clean sheets, with the visitors failing to score in 33% of their away matches versus 0% FTS for the hosts. With possession advantage (56% vs 47%) and more shots on target (4 vs 3.33), I give Cheongju the better chances, though a draw remains realistic.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cheongju | Gimhae City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cheongju is 46% better for: goals scored per match.
1.18 goals / match - Cheongju · 0.81 goals / match - Gimhae City
Cheongju is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.59 goals / match - Cheongju · 2.06 goals / match - Gimhae City
Cheongju scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).
Gimhae City scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Cheongju
Over / Under — Gimhae City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cheongju is 87% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / match - Cheongju · 0.69 pts / match - Gimhae City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gimhae City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cheongju
Gimhae City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Cheongju | Liga | Gimhae City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.76 | 2.75 | ▲ 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 76% | 61% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 56% | • 56% |
| Clean sheets | • 24% | 24% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Cheongju vs Gimhae City?
The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 1:1 Gimhae City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Gimhae City?
Cheongju score 1.18 goals per game on average and Gimhae City 0.81. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Cheongju's matches and 69% of Gimhae City's.
What form are Cheongju and Gimhae City in?
Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Gimhae City 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Gimhae City?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cheongju vs Gimhae City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.