South Korea - K League 2Cheongju StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Cheongju vs Hwaseong: match statistics

Cheongju crest
Cheongju
2 : 3half-time 1:1
Hwaseong crest
Hwaseong

Cheongju vs Hwaseong: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cheongju play Hwaseong in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 23 May 2026 at 12:00. Venue: Cheongju Stadium. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Cheongju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Hwaseong: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cheongju scores 1.18 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Hwaseong scores 1.53 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cheongju 76%, Hwaseong 53%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 53%, Hwaseong 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Hwaseong has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.42. Cheongju: 11.3 shots per match, Hwaseong: 11.8.

Match halves

Cheongju: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.65. Hwaseong: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Cheongju: 76-90+ (6 goals). Hwaseong: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 67%.

Match description

Cheongju has yet to win this season (0 wins, 10 draws, 2 losses) and at home records 0% wins and 67% draws; at home they average 0.83 goals per match with xG 1.59, indicating significant inefficiency (conversion rate ~6% and 3.67 shots on target per match). Hwaseong sit 5th, scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches and average 2.2 points per match (3 wins, 2 draws), but on the road they score only 0.67 goals on average and failed to score in 67% of away matches. The statistical matchup shows a home advantage in chance creation: 13.67 shots and 3.67 on target at home versus 7.33 and 2.33 for the visitors, and the home xG 1.59 exceeds the visitors' away xG 1.01, however Cheongju fail to convert this into goals. Hwaseong's strengths are recent points and scoring form (10 goals vs Cheongju's 4 in the last 5), which gives them a realistic chance to win despite weaker away form. Due to Cheongju's frequent home draws and the visitors' inconsistency away, I assess a draw as the most likely outcome, with a moderate probability of a Hwaseong win and a low probability of a home victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
CheongjuHwaseong
11Shots9
CheongjuHwaseong
7Shots on target4
CheongjuHwaseong
1.67xG1.42
CheongjuHwaseong
4Corners7
CheongjuHwaseong
67Dangerous attacks80
CheongjuHwaseong
6Fouls15
CheongjuHwaseong
2Cards3
CheongjuHwaseong

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.18Goals scored / match1.53
CheongjuHwaseong
1.59Goals conceded / match1.12
CheongjuHwaseong
55%Average possession47%
CheongjuHwaseong
3.88Shots on target / match4.59
CheongjuHwaseong

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.35Shots per match11.76
CheongjuHwaseong
3.88Shots on target4.59
CheongjuHwaseong
10.4%Shot conversion13%
CheongjuHwaseong
55%Possession47%
CheongjuHwaseong
1.42xG for1.47
CheongjuHwaseong
1.31xG against1.34
CheongjuHwaseong

Shooting quality

Cheongju: BalancedHwaseong: Counter-attacking
CheongjuHwaseong
Accuracy (shots on target)34%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hwaseong is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.8 pts / match - Hwaseong

Cheongju
LWLDW
Season result split
12% W65% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Hwaseong
WWLLW
Season result split
47% W24% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-5
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hwaseong is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.53 goals / match - Hwaseong

Hwaseong is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.12 goals / match - Hwaseong

Cheongju scoring profile: very strong

Cheongju scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).

Hwaseong scoring profile: very strong

Hwaseong scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

20Goals scored (season)26
CheongjuHwaseong
27Goals conceded (season)19
CheongjuHwaseong
2.76Average goals in match2.65
CheongjuHwaseong
7Goals scored (last 5)10
CheongjuHwaseong
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
CheongjuHwaseong

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal82%
CheongjuHwaseong
35%2 goals53%
CheongjuHwaseong
0%3 goals18%
CheongjuHwaseong
0%4 goals0%
CheongjuHwaseong

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal65%
CheongjuHwaseong
47%2 goals41%
CheongjuHwaseong
18%3 goals6%
CheongjuHwaseong
12%4 goals0%
CheongjuHwaseong

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time12%
CheongjuHwaseong
6%BTTS in both halves6%
CheongjuHwaseong
24%Scored in both halves35%
CheongjuHwaseong

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
CheongjuHwaseong
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
CheongjuHwaseong
80%BTTS - last 560%
CheongjuHwaseong

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
CheongjuHwaseong
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
CheongjuHwaseong
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
CheongjuHwaseong

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
CheongjuHwaseong
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
CheongjuHwaseong
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
CheongjuHwaseong

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hwaseong is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.47 pts / match - Hwaseong

Cheongju - half-time state
29% leading41% draw29% trailing
Hwaseong - half-time state
41% leading24% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.47
CheongjuHwaseong
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.65
CheongjuHwaseong
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
CheongjuHwaseong
1.12Average goals (1st half)1.24
CheongjuHwaseong
53%Clean sheet before half-time53%
CheongjuHwaseong
47%No goal before half-time47%
CheongjuHwaseong

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)1.82
CheongjuHwaseong
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
CheongjuHwaseong
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
CheongjuHwaseong
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.41
CheongjuHwaseong
41%Clean sheet after half-time53%
CheongjuHwaseong
47%No goal after half-time35%
CheongjuHwaseong

Cheongju - second-half results

18% W41% R41% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding41%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hwaseong - second-half results

47% W41% R12% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cheongju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Hwaseong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cheongju
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Hwaseong
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
4
31-45
6
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cheongju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Hwaseong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

CheongjuLigaHwaseong
Average goals in match 2.762.75 2.65
Both teams scored 76%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 53%
Clean sheets 24%24% 35%
Goal before half-time 76%73% 88%
Goal after half-time 71%76% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Cheongju 0 - 1 - 2 Hwaseong. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Hwaseong FC
1 : 0
Cheongju FC
Cheongju FC
1 : 1
Hwaseong FC
Hwaseong FC
2 : 1
Cheongju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cheongju vs Hwaseong?

The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 2:3 Hwaseong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cheongju and Hwaseong?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cheongju won 0, Hwaseong won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Hwaseong?

Cheongju score 1.18 goals per game on average and Hwaseong 1.53. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Cheongju's matches and 53% of Hwaseong's.

What form are Cheongju and Hwaseong in?

Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Hwaseong 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Hwaseong?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.