Cheongju vs Suwon Bluewings: match statistics
Cheongju vs Suwon Bluewings: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cheongju played Suwon Bluewings in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Venue: Cheongju Stadium. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Cheongju: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Suwon Bluewings: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cheongju scores 1.17 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Suwon Bluewings scores 1.44 and concedes 0.83. League average: 2.78 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cheongju 78%, Suwon Bluewings 44%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 50%, Suwon Bluewings 50%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Suwon Bluewings has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.41. Cheongju: 11.3 shots per match, Suwon Bluewings: 13.9.
Match halves
Cheongju: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.67. Suwon Bluewings: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
Cheongju: 76-90+ (7 goals). Suwon Bluewings: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-2. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 25%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (Suwon Bluewings). Suwon sit 1st in the table with a record of 11 wins, 3 draws and 4 losses and a goal difference of 26:15, while Cheongju have only 2 wins, 12 draws and 4 losses with a 21:28 record. Offensively the visitors also dominate — away Suwon average 16.44 shots and 5.56 on target per match, score 1.67 goals with xG 1.90, whereas Cheongju at home record 12.78 shots and 3.56 on target, 1.00 goal and xG 1.53, indicating clearly higher quality chances for the visitors. Defensively the gap is evident: Suwon concede 1.00 goal on average away and keep 44% clean sheets, while Cheongju concede 1.89 goals at home and have 22% clean sheets; additionally Suwon fail to score in 0% of away matches, whereas Cheongju fail to score in 11% of home games. Although in the last 5 matches Cheongju scored 8 goals and average 1.6 points per game versus Suwon’s 7 goals and 1.4 points, Suwon’s advantage in xG, shot volume and superior defence (home goal difference -8 vs away +6) leads me to assign 62% probability to an away win, 23% to a draw and 15% to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS more likely: 65% for 'Yes' vs 35% for 'No', based on offensive signals and recent form. Suwon clearly has stronger offensive metrics — season xG 1.9 vs 1.5 for Cheongju, last 5 matches xG 2.15 vs 1.3, and more shots (16.44 vs 11.11) and shots on target (5.56 vs 4.22), indicating Suwon should score. Cheongju as the home side, however, has a season-high clean sheet rate of 56% and a low season average goals conceded 0.67 plus a season BTTS only 33%, which argues against both teams scoring. Still, recent form reverses the picture: both teams have 60% BTTS in their last 5 matches, Cheongju in the last 5 averages 1.6 scored and 1.4 conceded (8-7), and Suwon scores 1.4 and concedes 1.0 (7-5), so goals for both sides are likely. Additionally the league has a season BTTS of 63% and goals average 2.78, which increases the probability of a 'both teams to score' scenario, hence the pick 'Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals using average xG: Cheongju has xG_for 1.5 and Suwon xG_against 0.92, yielding ~1.21 expected home goals, while Suwon has xG_for 1.9 and Cheongju xG_against 1.11, yielding ~1.51 expected away goals (total ≈2.72). A Poisson model with λ=2.72 translates to probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈75%, Over 2.5 ≈51% and Over 3.5 ≈29% (Under respectively 25%, 49%, 71%). Suwon shows a clear offensive edge: on average 16.44 shots and 5.56 shots on target per match and 67% of season matches over 1.5 goals, whereas Cheongju averages 11.11 shots and 4.22 on target and only 44% of matches over 1.5. Cheongju has 56% clean sheets and a season average of 0.67 goals conceded, which suppresses scoring, but Suwon’s xG advantage (1.51 vs 1.21) and the league average of 2.78 goals/match suggest at least two goals in the game. Therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (probability ~75%); the 2.5 line is balanced (~51% Over) and less certain.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a half-time draw with an away win (X/2) as the most likely scenario. The home team drew at the break in 5 of 9 matches (56%), while the visitors did so in 4 of 9 (44%), with the home side never trailing at half-time (0%), which increases the probability of a HT draw. After the break the visitors are clearly stronger — they average 1.11 goals in the second half versus 0.67 for the hosts and won the second half in 56% of their matches compared to 22% for the home team. Additionally, the visitors have a higher xG (1.90 vs 1.50) and generate more shots (16.44 vs 11.11) and shots on target (5.56 vs 4.22), therefore the HT/FT scenario X/2 is given the highest weight.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cheongju | Suwon Bluewings | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Suwon Bluewings is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Cheongju · 2 pts / match - Suwon Bluewings
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Suwon Bluewings is 23% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.44 goals / match - Suwon Bluewings
Suwon Bluewings is 88% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.56 goals / match - Cheongju · 0.83 goals / match - Suwon Bluewings
Cheongju scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while Suwon Bluewings keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 matches).
Suwon Bluewings scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Cheongju
Over / Under — Suwon Bluewings
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Suwon Bluewings is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.28 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.83 pts / match - Suwon Bluewings
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Suwon Bluewings - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cheongju
Suwon Bluewings
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Cheongju | Liga | Suwon Bluewings | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.72 | 2.78 | ▼ 2.28 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 78% | 63% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 22% | 23% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 72% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 77% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Cheongju 0 - 2 - 2 Suwon Bluewings. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 25% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cheongju vs Suwon Bluewings?
The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 2:3 Suwon Bluewings. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cheongju and Suwon Bluewings?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Cheongju won 0, Suwon Bluewings won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Suwon Bluewings?
Cheongju score 1.17 goals per game on average and Suwon Bluewings 1.44. The K League 2 average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Cheongju's matches and 44% of Suwon Bluewings's.
What form are Cheongju and Suwon Bluewings in?
Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Suwon Bluewings 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Suwon Bluewings?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cheongju vs Suwon Bluewings: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


