Chesterfield vs Barnet: match statistics
Chesterfield vs Barnet: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chesterfield played against Barnet in EFL League Two (England). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Technique Stadium. Final score: 3:3.
Recent form
Chesterfield has 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Barnet has 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Chesterfield scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 1.00. Barnet scores 2.25 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Chesterfield's games and 100% of Barnet's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 75%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Barnet has the higher season xG average, 1.75 to 1.71 per game. Chesterfield takes 15.3 shots per game, while Barnet takes 14.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Chesterfield leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Barnet leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chesterfield's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Barnet, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League Two games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Barnet sit 2nd, while Chesterfield are only 16th, and the visitors have won 2 of their 3 league matches without suffering a defeat. Chesterfield have scored just 2 goals this season and failed to find the net in their only home match, despite generating an xG of 1.80. Barnet average 3 goals per away game, convert 20% of their shots, and have yet to finish a match without scoring. The quality of chances also favors the visitors: their average xG against is 1.01, significantly lower than the 1.61 conceded by Chesterfield at home. Barnet have recorded 3 wins and scored 14 goals in their last five matches, making them clear favorites to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data strongly supports goals for both sides: Chesterfield and Barnet have a BTTS rate of 100%, and neither team has kept a clean sheet yet. The hosts average 2.5 goals scored and 1.5 conceded, while Barnet score as many as 3.0 goals per match and allow opponents 1.0 goal. Their attacking potential is confirmed by the xG figures: 2.00 for Chesterfield and 1.59 for Barnet, while the hosts average 5.5 shots on target. The main risk factor is Chesterfield’s weaker recent finishing, with the team scoring only 0.4 goals in its last 5 matches and recording BTTS in 20% of games. Despite this, Barnet have averaged 2.8 goals scored and 1.4 conceded over the same period, with a BTTS rate of 100%, making a home breakthrough and a goal from both teams the more likely scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have gone over this line in 100% of their league matches so far, and neither has kept a clean sheet. Barnet are particularly dangerous in attack: they have averaged 2.8 goals scored across their last five matches, with an xG of 1.96, while Chesterfield have conceded 0.8 goals per game during this period. The hosts do have weaker current finishing numbers, averaging 0.4 goals across their last five appearances, but they create chances worth 1.43 xG per match, while Barnet allow opponents 1.31 xG. The seasonal averages of both teams are above the league benchmark of 2.5 goals: Chesterfield matches produce 4.0 goals, and Barnet matches also produce 4.0. The Over 2.5 goals line is also supported by positive indicators, but the hosts’ weaker scoring form reduces its confidence compared with the safer Over 1.5 goals bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Barnet are clearly in better current form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 2.8 goals and won 60% of their games, while Chesterfield have scored just 0.4 goals per match and lost 60% of theirs. The visitors were leading at the break in 60% of those appearances and did not trail in any of them, whereas the hosts went into half-time behind in 60% of their matches, scoring only 0.2 goals per game before the interval. Barnet’s advantage is also evident after the break: they average 1.4 goals in second halves, compared with just 0.2 for Chesterfield, while the hosts have failed to win any of their last five second halves. Chesterfield do create more chances in the season-long data, with an xG of 2.00 compared with Barnet’s 1.59 and 5.5 shots on target versus 3.0, but current efficiency and form clearly favor the visitors. The most likely scenario is therefore an HT/FT outcome of 1/1, with Barnet taking the lead at the break and holding it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chesterfield | Barnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Barnet is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Chesterfield · 2 pts / game - Barnet
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Barnet is 200% better for: goals scored per game.
0.75 goals / game - Chesterfield · 2.25 goals / game - Barnet
Chesterfield is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Chesterfield · 1.25 goals / game - Barnet
Chesterfield scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 games), while Barnet keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
Barnet scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Chesterfield keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chesterfield
Over / Under - Barnet
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Barnet is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Chesterfield · 2 pts / game - Barnet
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chesterfield - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Barnet - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 75% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 25% |
| No goal | 25% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chesterfield
Barnet
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Chesterfield | Liga | Barnet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.75 | 2.60 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 50% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 26% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Chesterfield's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Barnet. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Chesterfield vs Barnet?
The EFL League Two match finished Chesterfield 3:3 Barnet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chesterfield and Barnet?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chesterfield won 1, Barnet won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chesterfield vs Barnet?
Chesterfield score 0.75 goals per game on average and Barnet 2.25. The EFL League Two average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Chesterfield's matches and 100% of Barnet's.
What form are Chesterfield and Barnet in?
Over the last 5 games Chesterfield have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Barnet 2-2-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chesterfield vs Barnet?
The statistical background for Chesterfield vs Barnet — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.