Chesterfield vs Shrewsbury Town: match statistics
Chesterfield displays significantly stronger home form with a 47% win rate at home and an impressive +14 goal difference on their own turf. The hosts score an average of 1.76 goals per home match with only a 12% loss rate, making them a tough opponent for the visitors. Shrewsbury Town has a disastrous away record with a 65% loss rate and a negative goal difference of -19, conceding an average of 2.06 goals on the road. Despite a good recent overall run (2.4 PPG), the visitors' away form remains very poor with just 18% wins. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.52 vs 1.16), and the advantage in possession (58% vs 44%) and shot efficiency confirms Chesterfield's dominance. All indicators point to a certain victory for the hosts.
Chesterfield vs Shrewsbury Town: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chesterfield played against Shrewsbury Town in EFL League Two (England). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 2:3.
Recent form
Chesterfield has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Shrewsbury Town has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Chesterfield scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.26. Shrewsbury Town scores 0.97 and allows 1.54. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Chesterfield's games and 49% of Shrewsbury Town's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 49%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chesterfield has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.27 per game. Chesterfield takes 11.7 shots per game, while Shrewsbury Town takes 11.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Chesterfield leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.89 goals per game after halftime. Shrewsbury Town leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.57 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chesterfield's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Shrewsbury Town, it is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League Two games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chesterfield displays significantly stronger home form with a 47% win rate at home and an impressive +14 goal difference on their own turf. The hosts score an average of 1.76 goals per home match with only a 12% loss rate, making them a tough opponent for the visitors. Shrewsbury Town has a disastrous away record with a 65% loss rate and a negative goal difference of -19, conceding an average of 2.06 goals on the road. Despite a good recent overall run (2.4 PPG), the visitors' away form remains very poor with just 18% wins. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.52 vs 1.16), and the advantage in possession (58% vs 44%) and shot efficiency confirms Chesterfield's dominance. All indicators point to a certain victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chesterfield | Shrewsbury Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shrewsbury Town is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Chesterfield · 2.4 pts / game - Shrewsbury Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chesterfield is 62% better for: goals scored per game.
1.57 goals / game - Chesterfield · 0.97 goals / game - Shrewsbury Town
Chesterfield is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.26 goals / game - Chesterfield · 1.54 goals / game - Shrewsbury Town
Chesterfield scores in 89% of games (31 of 35 meczów), while Shrewsbury Town keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 35 meczów).
Shrewsbury Town scores in 66% of games (23 of 35 meczów), while Chesterfield keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 35 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chesterfield
Over / Under - Shrewsbury Town
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chesterfield is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.49 pts / game - Chesterfield · 0.91 pts / game - Shrewsbury Town
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chesterfield - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Shrewsbury Town - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chesterfield
Shrewsbury Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Chesterfield | Liga | Shrewsbury Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.83 | 2.55 | • 2.51 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 53% | ▼ 49% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 46% | 47% | ▲ 49% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 27% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 74% | 69% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 76% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Chesterfield's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Shrewsbury Town. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Chesterfield vs Shrewsbury Town?
The EFL League Two match finished Chesterfield 2:3 Shrewsbury Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chesterfield vs Shrewsbury Town?
Chesterfield score 1.57 goals per game on average and Shrewsbury Town 0.97. The EFL League Two average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Chesterfield's matches and 49% of Shrewsbury Town's.
What form are Chesterfield and Shrewsbury Town in?
Over the last 5 games Chesterfield have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Shrewsbury Town 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chesterfield vs Shrewsbury Town?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chesterfield vs Shrewsbury Town: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


