United States - MLS Next ProSeatGeek StadiumData current as of August 13, 2026

Chicago Fire II vs Orlando City II: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Chicago Fire II vs Orlando City II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chicago Fire II plays Orlando City II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game is scheduled for August 16, 2026. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium.

Recent form

Chicago Fire II has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Orlando City II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Chicago Fire II scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.67. Orlando City II scores 1.95 and allows 1.82. Games in this league average 3.24 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 71% of Chicago Fire II's games and 82% of Orlando City II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 86% and 77%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Orlando City II has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.59 per game. Chicago Fire II takes 13.1 shots per game, while Orlando City II takes 13.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Chicago Fire II leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Orlando City II leads at halftime in 23% and scores 1.23 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chicago Fire II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (13 goals). For Orlando City II, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS Next Pro games average 3.24 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
2Goals scored / game1.95
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
1.67Goals allowed / game1.82
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
51%Average possession55%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
4.76Shots on target / game5.91
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.05Shots per game13.82
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
4.76Shots on target5.91
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
15.3%Shot conversion14.1%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
51%Possession55%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
1.59xG for1.67
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
1.5xG against1.65
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire II: Efficient finishingOrlando City II: Efficient finishing
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chicago Fire II is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Chicago Fire II · 0.8 pts / game - Orlando City II

Chicago Fire II
WLWWL
Season result split
38% W24% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-8
1.38 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.93Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Orlando City II
WDLLL
Season result split
41% W27% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-7
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.01Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire II is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.67 goals / game - Chicago Fire II · 1.82 goals / game - Orlando City II

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire II scores in 81% of games (17 of 21 meczów), while Orlando City II keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 meczów).

Orlando City II scoring profile: very strong

Orlando City II scores in 86% of games (19 of 22 meczów), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 meczów).

42Goals scored (season)43
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
35Goals conceded (season)40
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
3.67Average goals per game3.77
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
19Goals scored (last 5)5
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal86%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
57%2 goals64%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
29%3 goals27%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
14%4 goals14%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal95%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
57%2 goals55%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
24%3 goals23%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
5%4 goals9%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time27%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
19%BTTS in both halves5%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
48%Scored in both halves36%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS73%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
80%BTTS - last 560%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire II is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.62 pts / game - Chicago Fire II · 1 pts / game - Orlando City II

Chicago Fire II - half-time state
43% leading33% draw24% trailing
Orlando City II - half-time state
23% leading32% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per game (1st half)1
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
1.14Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
1.81Average goals (1st half)1.45
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
52%Clean sheet before half-time45%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
33%No goal before half-time50%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per game (2nd half)1.55
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1.23
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
1.86Average goals (2nd half)2.05
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
24%Clean sheet after half-time32%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II
38%No goal after half-time32%
Chicago Fire IIOrlando City II

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

29% W38% R33% P
34
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 38%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Orlando City II - second-half results

45% W18% R36% P
22
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Chicago Fire II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.802.00
Goals scored / game2.21.6
Goals allowed / game1.20.8
Average goals per game3.42.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%80%
3 goals80%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+5+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 11
Orlando City II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.40
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
6
2
16-30
13
7
31-45
9
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Orlando City II
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
4
4
16-30
6
9
31-45
5
5
46-60
11
10
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.72
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
77%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Orlando City II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chicago Fire IILigaOrlando City II
Average goals per game 3.673.24 3.77
Both teams scored 71%61% 82%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 86%66% 77%
Clean sheets 19%22% 5%
Goal before half-time 81%75% 77%
Goal after half-time 90%83% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.24
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / game
1.40
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Chicago Fire II's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against Orlando City II. Games average 4.33 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Chicago Fire II
1 : 3
Orlando City II
Orlando City II
2 : 1
Chicago Fire II
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
5 : 1
Orlando City II

FAQ

When do Chicago Fire II and Orlando City II play?

Chicago Fire II face Orlando City II on August 16, 2026 in MLS Next Pro at SeatGeek Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire II and Orlando City II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chicago Fire II won 1, Orlando City II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire II vs Orlando City II?

Chicago Fire II score 2.00 goals per game on average and Orlando City II 1.95. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Chicago Fire II's matches and 82% of Orlando City II's.

What form are Chicago Fire II and Orlando City II in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Orlando City II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire II vs Orlando City II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chicago Fire II vs Orlando City II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.