United States - MLS Next ProSeatGeek StadiumData current as of September 20, 2026

Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II: match statistics

Chicago Fire II crest
Chicago Fire II
2 : 4half-time 1:2
Toronto II crest
Toronto II

Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chicago Fire II played against Toronto II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on August 10, 2026. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium. Final score: 2:4.

Recent form

Chicago Fire II has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Toronto II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Chicago Fire II scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.55. Toronto II scores 1.55 and allows 1.90. Games in this league average 3.23 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 70% of Chicago Fire II's games and 60% of Toronto II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 85% and 75%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Chicago Fire II has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.25 per game. Chicago Fire II takes 12.8 shots per game, while Toronto II takes 10.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Chicago Fire II leads at halftime in 45% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. Toronto II leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.80 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chicago Fire II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (12 goals). For Toronto II, it is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS Next Pro games average 3.23 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire II boast a very strong home profile: they win 67% of their matches, score an average of 2.56 goals, and have a positive goal difference of +11. Toronto II lose as many as 64% of their away games, concede an average of 2.00 goals, and score just 1.27 per match. The hosts are also clearly in better form, having won 3 of their last five matches and scored 19 goals, while the visitors have suffered 4 defeats and scored only 7 goals. Chicago also hold the edge in the quality of chances created, with an average home xG of 1.75 compared with Toronto’s 1.20 away from home, while the visitors fail to score in 45% of their away matches. Toronto may take advantage of Chicago conceding an average of 1.33 goals at home, but the statistics strongly point to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Chicago Fire II have recorded BTTS in 89% of their matches this season, well above the league average of 62%, while in their last five games, both teams scored in 80% of fixtures. The hosts average 1.89 goals per match, while Toronto II concede as many as 2.00 goals per game, strongly supporting a Chicago goal. The visitors score an average of 1.27 goals, while Chicago allow opponents 1.78 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in only 11% of games. Toronto II have a lower season BTTS rate of 36% and have failed to score in 45% of their appearances, but their current 80% BTTS run and 1.4 goals scored per match increase the likelihood of a response. The “Yes” pick is more likely because both sides’ defensive weaknesses are combined with a high current scoring frequency, particularly from the in-form hosts.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Chicago Fire II average 1.89 goals per match, while Toronto II concede as many as 2.00, clearly favoring the hosts in the goals market. In their last five matches, Chicago scored 19 goals, averaging 3.8 per game, with an xG of 1.76, while Toronto conceded 2.0 goals per match during this period. The 1.5 line was surpassed in 89% of Chicago’s matches and 73% of Toronto’s, while the league-wide average stands at a high 3.28 goals. Additionally, Over 2.5 goals landed in 100% and 80% of the teams’ last five matches respectively, making a one-goal game scenario unlikely. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as it combines a very high historical frequency with the hosts’ attacking form and the visitors’ defensive weakness.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Chicago Fire II were leading at the break in 5 of their 9 home matches, or 56% of games, while Toronto II were trailing at half-time in 36% of their away fixtures. The hosts average 1.22 goals scored and concede just 0.44 before the break, whereas Toronto II score only 0.36 goals during this phase. Chicago’s advantage is also evident in their last five matches: the team won 60% of games and averaged 3.8 goals, while Toronto II lost 80% of matches and conceded an average of 2.0 goals. Across the season as a whole, the hosts won 56% of their matches, compared with just 18% victories for the visitors, while their average goals scored stand at 1.89 and 1.27 respectively. Although both teams have been less consistent after half-time, Chicago’s current attacking strength and Toronto’s poor away form most strongly support the HT/FT 1/1 scenario, with the hosts leading at the break and securing the win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 2
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
19Shots11
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
7Shots on target6
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
2.2xG1.52
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
4Corners0
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
72Dangerous attacks55
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
14Fouls9
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
0Cards3
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Chicago Fire IIToronto II
2Goals scored / game1.55
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.55Goals allowed / game1.9
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
51%Average possession48%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
4.65Shots on target / game4.3
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.75Shots per game10.05
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
4.65Shots on target4.3
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
15.7%Shot conversion15.4%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
51%Possession48%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.56xG for1.25
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.49xG against1.64
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire II: Efficient finishingToronto II: Efficient finishing
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chicago Fire II is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Chicago Fire II · 0.6 pts / game - Toronto II

Chicago Fire II
DWLWW
Season result split
40% W25% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-7
1.45 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Toronto II
LLLWL
Season result split
35% W15% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-10
1.20 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire II is 29% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Chicago Fire II · 1.55 goals / game - Toronto II

Chicago Fire II is 23% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.55 goals / game - Chicago Fire II · 1.9 goals / game - Toronto II

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire II scores in 80% of games (16 of 20 games), while Toronto II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 games).

Toronto II scoring profile: very strong

Toronto II scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 games).

40Goals scored (season)31
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
31Goals conceded (season)38
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
3.55Average goals per game3.45
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
19Goals scored (last 5)7
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal75%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
55%2 goals55%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
30%3 goals15%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
15%4 goals5%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
55%2 goals50%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
20%3 goals35%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
0%4 goals15%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time15%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
15%BTTS in both halves10%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
45%Scored in both halves25%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
80%BTTS - last 580%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
55%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire II is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.7 pts / game - Chicago Fire II · 1.45 pts / game - Toronto II

Chicago Fire II - half-time state
45% leading35% draw20% trailing
Toronto II - half-time state
35% leading40% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per game (1st half)1.45
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.15Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.75Average goals (1st half)1.2
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
55%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
35%No goal before half-time50%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per game (2nd half)0.8
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
0.95Goals conceded (2nd half)1.45
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.8Average goals (2nd half)2.25
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
25%Clean sheet after half-time30%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
40%No goal after half-time50%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

30% W40% D30% L
34
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 40%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Toronto II - second-half results

15% W35% D50% L
29
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chicago Fire II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.20
Goals scored / game2.21.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game3.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%80%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+6+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 11
Toronto II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.40
Goals scored / game1.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.4
Average goals per game1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
6
1
16-30
12
6
31-45
8
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Toronto II
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
4
8
46-60
6
6
61-75
6
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Toronto II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chicago Fire IILigaToronto II
Average goals per game 3.553.23 3.45
Both teams scored 70%61% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 85%65% 75%
Clean sheets 20%22% 20%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 70%
Goal after half-time 90%83% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / game
1.40
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Toronto IIYellow cardAdisa De Rosario
  2. Chicago Fire IIGoalDamyan VillanuevaAssist: Damian Nigg
  3. Chicago Fire IISubstitutionOn: Tidiane DiawaraOff: Dean Boltz
  4. Toronto IIYellow cardMicah Chisholm
  5. Chicago Fire IIGoalTidiane Diawara
  6. Toronto IIYellow cardBryce Richard Boneau

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Chicago Fire II's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Toronto II. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Toronto FC II USL
2 : 3
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
Toronto FC II USL
2 : 0
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
1 : 0
Toronto FC II USL

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Chicago Fire II 2:4 Toronto II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire II and Toronto II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chicago Fire II won 2, Toronto II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II?

Chicago Fire II score 2.00 goals per game on average and Toronto II 1.55. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Chicago Fire II's matches and 60% of Toronto II's.

What form are Chicago Fire II and Toronto II in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Toronto II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.