Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II: match statistics
Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chicago Fire II played against Toronto II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on August 10, 2026. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium. Final score: 2:4.
Recent form
Chicago Fire II has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Toronto II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Chicago Fire II scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.55. Toronto II scores 1.55 and allows 1.90. Games in this league average 3.23 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 70% of Chicago Fire II's games and 60% of Toronto II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 85% and 75%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chicago Fire II has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.25 per game. Chicago Fire II takes 12.8 shots per game, while Toronto II takes 10.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Chicago Fire II leads at halftime in 45% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. Toronto II leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chicago Fire II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (12 goals). For Toronto II, it is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS Next Pro games average 3.23 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chicago Fire II boast a very strong home profile: they win 67% of their matches, score an average of 2.56 goals, and have a positive goal difference of +11. Toronto II lose as many as 64% of their away games, concede an average of 2.00 goals, and score just 1.27 per match. The hosts are also clearly in better form, having won 3 of their last five matches and scored 19 goals, while the visitors have suffered 4 defeats and scored only 7 goals. Chicago also hold the edge in the quality of chances created, with an average home xG of 1.75 compared with Toronto’s 1.20 away from home, while the visitors fail to score in 45% of their away matches. Toronto may take advantage of Chicago conceding an average of 1.33 goals at home, but the statistics strongly point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Chicago Fire II have recorded BTTS in 89% of their matches this season, well above the league average of 62%, while in their last five games, both teams scored in 80% of fixtures. The hosts average 1.89 goals per match, while Toronto II concede as many as 2.00 goals per game, strongly supporting a Chicago goal. The visitors score an average of 1.27 goals, while Chicago allow opponents 1.78 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in only 11% of games. Toronto II have a lower season BTTS rate of 36% and have failed to score in 45% of their appearances, but their current 80% BTTS run and 1.4 goals scored per match increase the likelihood of a response. The “Yes” pick is more likely because both sides’ defensive weaknesses are combined with a high current scoring frequency, particularly from the in-form hosts.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Chicago Fire II average 1.89 goals per match, while Toronto II concede as many as 2.00, clearly favoring the hosts in the goals market. In their last five matches, Chicago scored 19 goals, averaging 3.8 per game, with an xG of 1.76, while Toronto conceded 2.0 goals per match during this period. The 1.5 line was surpassed in 89% of Chicago’s matches and 73% of Toronto’s, while the league-wide average stands at a high 3.28 goals. Additionally, Over 2.5 goals landed in 100% and 80% of the teams’ last five matches respectively, making a one-goal game scenario unlikely. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as it combines a very high historical frequency with the hosts’ attacking form and the visitors’ defensive weakness.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Chicago Fire II were leading at the break in 5 of their 9 home matches, or 56% of games, while Toronto II were trailing at half-time in 36% of their away fixtures. The hosts average 1.22 goals scored and concede just 0.44 before the break, whereas Toronto II score only 0.36 goals during this phase. Chicago’s advantage is also evident in their last five matches: the team won 60% of games and averaged 3.8 goals, while Toronto II lost 80% of matches and conceded an average of 2.0 goals. Across the season as a whole, the hosts won 56% of their matches, compared with just 18% victories for the visitors, while their average goals scored stand at 1.89 and 1.27 respectively. Although both teams have been less consistent after half-time, Chicago’s current attacking strength and Toronto’s poor away form most strongly support the HT/FT 1/1 scenario, with the hosts leading at the break and securing the win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chicago Fire II | Toronto II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chicago Fire II is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Chicago Fire II · 0.6 pts / game - Toronto II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire II is 29% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - Chicago Fire II · 1.55 goals / game - Toronto II
Chicago Fire II is 23% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.55 goals / game - Chicago Fire II · 1.9 goals / game - Toronto II
Chicago Fire II scores in 80% of games (16 of 20 games), while Toronto II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 games).
Toronto II scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chicago Fire II
Over / Under - Toronto II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire II is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.7 pts / game - Chicago Fire II · 1.45 pts / game - Toronto II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chicago Fire II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 40%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Toronto II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 3.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chicago Fire II
Toronto II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Chicago Fire II | Liga | Toronto II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.55 | 3.23 | ▲ 3.45 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 61% | • 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 85% | 65% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 22% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 75% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 83% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Chicago Fire II's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Toronto II. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Chicago Fire II 2:4 Toronto II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire II and Toronto II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chicago Fire II won 2, Toronto II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II?
Chicago Fire II score 2.00 goals per game on average and Toronto II 1.55. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Chicago Fire II's matches and 60% of Toronto II's.
What form are Chicago Fire II and Toronto II in?
Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Toronto II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


