United States - MLSData current as of September 01, 2026

Chicago Fire vs Sporting KC: match statistics

Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire
5 : 0half-time 0:0
Sporting KC crest
Sporting KC

Chicago Fire vs Sporting KC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chicago Fire played against Sporting KC in MLS (United States). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Recent form

Chicago Fire has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Sporting KC has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Chicago Fire scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.00. Sporting KC scores 0.88 and allows 2.50. Games in this league average 3.19 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Chicago Fire's games and 63% of Sporting KC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 88%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Chicago Fire has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 0.86 per game. Chicago Fire takes 12.9 shots per game, while Sporting KC takes 6.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Chicago Fire leads at halftime in 63% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Sporting KC leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chicago Fire's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Sporting KC, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.19 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a Chicago Fire win (1): the hosts have won 4 of their last 5 matches and hold a 75% home win rate, averaging 2.6 points per game across their last five, while Sporting KC have lost all 5 most recent fixtures and collected 0 points in that span. Chicago have scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches (12 in the season) and conceded 5, whereas Sporting have only 3 goals in their last 5 (7 in the season) and have shipped 16 goals in the last 5 (20 in the season). At home Fire average 1.5 goals for and 0.5 against per game, while Sporting away average 0.75 goals for and 2.5 against, clearly indicating a defensive edge for the hosts. Chance creation also favors Chicago: on average 15 shots and 4.75 on target at home versus 5.5 shots and 2 on target for Sporting on the road; Chicago’s home xG is 1.61, while Sporting’s away xG is 0.73 with an xG against of 2.14. Additionally, Chicago have 0% matches without scoring at home and 75% clean sheets at home, whereas Sporting have 50% matches without scoring away and 0% clean sheets, so I assess a high probability of a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I assign a 78% probability to BTTS - Yes and 22% to No Goal because Chicago has a seasonal BTTS rate of 75% and 0% clean sheets at home, while Sporting has a seasonal BTTS of 50% and 0% clean sheets away. Both teams concede an average of 2.5 goals this season (Chicago 2.5, Sporting 2.5), and the league shows BTTS at 57% with an average of 3.24 goals per match, which favors a both-teams-to-score outcome. In the last 5 matches Chicago scored 9 goals (1.8 avg) and conceded 5 (1.0), whereas Sporting scored 3 (0.6) and conceded 16 (3.2), so Sporting is highly vulnerable to conceding. From an xG perspective Chicago has recent xG for 1.32 and xG against 1.77, and Sporting has xG for 0.83 and xG against 1.97, indicating both sides create or allow scoring opportunities. Additionally, 75% of Chicago’s home matches are over 2.5 goals and Sporting has 100% of away matches over 2.5 goals, which together provide a strong signal for 'yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals from xG and form analysis are around 2.87 (Chicago Fire 1.62 and Sporting KC 1.25), based on xG from the last 5 matches (Chicago 1.32, Sporting 0.83) and opponents’ defensive xG (Sporting conceded 1.97, Chicago 1.77). Seasonal indicators confirm a tendency for higher scoring: Over 2.5 occurred in 75% of Chicago’s matches and 100% of Sporting’s, and in the last 5 matches were 60% and 100% respectively. Sporting KC conceded an average of 3.2 goals in the last 5 games (16 conceded), while Chicago is on a run “wwwwd” and averaged 1.8 goals in the last 5; Chicago averages 7.75 shots (3.5 on target) versus Sporting KC 5.5 (2.0 on target). A Poisson model with an expected total of 2.87 goals gives about a 55% chance of Over 2.5; factoring in seasonal frequencies I forecast Over 2.5 at ~68% (Over 1.5 ~82%, Over 3.5 ~39%). On this basis I recommend a bet on Over 2.5 as the strongest signal: the combination of high seasonal rates (75%/100%), Chicago’s form and Sporting KC’s weak defense (3.2 conceded in the last 5) favors Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is Chicago Fire leading at the break and the hosts winning (HT/FT 1/1), because in 4 of the last 5 matches the hosts led at half-time (80%) and won 4 of 5 games (80%). Chicago averages 1.4 first-half goals over the last 5 matches compared to Sporting KC’s 0.4, while the visitors conceded an average of 1.8 first-half goals in those five fixtures, giving the home side a clear advantage in the opening period. Additionally, Chicago generates higher xG (0.98 vs 0.73) and more shots on target (3.5 vs 2.0), confirming offensive dominance; conversion rates are similar (13% vs 14%), but the xG and shots-on-target edge favors the Fire. Recent form over five matches also favors the hosts (wwwwd vs lllll), with the last five-match statistics showing 80% wins for Chicago versus 0% for the visitors, increasing the likelihood of maintaining the halftime lead to full-time. For these reasons I assign the highest probability to 1/1, while 1/X and X/1 receive smaller shares due to the risk of a turnaround or equalizer and the seasonal context that home teams had 75% of games with both teams scoring versus 50% for the away side.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
5 : 0
Second half

Game stats

71Possession (%)29
Chicago FireSporting KC
17Shots6
Chicago FireSporting KC
6Shots on target1
Chicago FireSporting KC
2.04xG0.62
Chicago FireSporting KC
4Corners2
Chicago FireSporting KC
76Dangerous attacks23
Chicago FireSporting KC
15Fouls17
Chicago FireSporting KC
1Cards0
Chicago FireSporting KC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Chicago FireSporting KC
1.5Goals scored / game0.88
Chicago FireSporting KC
1Goals allowed / game2.5
Chicago FireSporting KC
50%Average possession46%
Chicago FireSporting KC
4.38Shots on target / game2.75
Chicago FireSporting KC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.88Shots per game6.63
Chicago FireSporting KC
4.38Shots on target2.75
Chicago FireSporting KC
11.7%Shot conversion13.2%
Chicago FireSporting KC
50%Possession46%
Chicago FireSporting KC
1.42xG for0.86
Chicago FireSporting KC
1.5xG against1.87
Chicago FireSporting KC

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire: BalancedSporting KC: Counter-attacking
Chicago FireSporting KC
Accuracy (shots on target)34%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chicago Fire is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Chicago Fire · 0.6 pts / game - Sporting KC

Chicago Fire
LWWWD
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-2
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 at home
3-0-1
WLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Sporting KC
WLLLL
Season result split
13% W13% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-6
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 away
1-0-3
LWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 0.86Opponent xG: 1.97BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 70% better for: goals scored per game.

1.5 goals / game - Chicago Fire · 0.88 goals / game - Sporting KC

Chicago Fire is 150% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Chicago Fire · 2.5 goals / game - Sporting KC

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while Sporting KC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 meczów).

Sporting KC scoring profile: mixed

Sporting KC scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 meczów), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 meczów).

12Goals scored (season)7
Chicago FireSporting KC
8Goals conceded (season)20
Chicago FireSporting KC
2.5Average goals per game3.38
Chicago FireSporting KC
8Goals scored (last 5)5
Chicago FireSporting KC
6Goals conceded (last 5)14
Chicago FireSporting KC

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal63%
Chicago FireSporting KC
38%2 goals25%
Chicago FireSporting KC
25%3 goals0%
Chicago FireSporting KC
0%4 goals0%
Chicago FireSporting KC

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Chicago FireSporting KC
38%2 goals75%
Chicago FireSporting KC
13%3 goals63%
Chicago FireSporting KC
0%4 goals13%
Chicago FireSporting KC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
Chicago FireSporting KC
13%BTTS in both halves0%
Chicago FireSporting KC
38%Scored in both halves13%
Chicago FireSporting KC

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
Chicago FireSporting KC
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Chicago FireSporting KC
60%BTTS - last 580%
Chicago FireSporting KC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Chicago FireSporting KC
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Chicago FireSporting KC
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Chicago FireSporting KC

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Chicago FireSporting KC
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Chicago FireSporting KC
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Chicago FireSporting KC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 350% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.25 pts / game - Chicago Fire · 0.5 pts / game - Sporting KC

Chicago Fire - half-time state
63% leading38% draw0% trailing
Sporting KC - half-time state
13% leading13% draw75% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.25Points per game (1st half)0.5
Chicago FireSporting KC
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Chicago FireSporting KC
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)1.38
Chicago FireSporting KC
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.75
Chicago FireSporting KC
75%Clean sheet before half-time13%
Chicago FireSporting KC
25%No goal before half-time63%
Chicago FireSporting KC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per game (2nd half)0.75
Chicago FireSporting KC
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Chicago FireSporting KC
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)1.13
Chicago FireSporting KC
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.63
Chicago FireSporting KC
63%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Chicago FireSporting KC
50%No goal after half-time63%
Chicago FireSporting KC

Chicago Fire - second-half results

25% W38% R38% P
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at halftime in 63% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Sporting KC - second-half results

13% W38% R50% P
4
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Chicago Fire - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.00
Goals scored / game1.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Sporting KC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.40
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game1.41.4
Average goals per game2.01.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-4-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Sporting KC
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
6
31-45
2
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.94
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Sporting KC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Chicago FireLigaSporting KC
Average goals per game 2.503.19 3.38
Both teams scored 50%57% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%62% 88%
Clean sheets 50%24% 0%
Goal before half-time 75%74% 100%
Goal after half-time 63%79% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.93
Home goals / game
1.26
Away goals / game
+53%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chicago FireYellow cardAndrew Gutman
  2. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Robin LodOff: Puso Dithejane
  3. Chicago FireGoalMaren Haile-SelassieAssist: Andrew Gutman
  4. Sporting KCSubstitutionOn: Jacob BartlettOff: Osvaldo Pedro Capemba
  5. Chicago FireGoalHugo Jean-Marc CuypersAssist: Jack Elliott

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire vs Sporting KC?

The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 5:0 Sporting KC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs Sporting KC?

Chicago Fire score 1.50 goals per game on average and Sporting KC 0.88. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Chicago Fire's matches and 63% of Sporting KC's.

What form are Chicago Fire and Sporting KC in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Sporting KC 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs Sporting KC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.