United States - MLSSoldier FieldData current as of October 14, 2026

Chicago Fire vs Vancouver Whitecaps: match statistics

Chicago Fire vs Vancouver Whitecaps: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chicago Fire played against Vancouver Whitecaps in MLS (United States). The game was played on October 7, 2026. Venue: Soldier Field. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Chicago Fire has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Vancouver Whitecaps has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Chicago Fire scores 1.77 goals per game and allows 1.46. Vancouver Whitecaps scores 2.27 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.22 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 69% of Chicago Fire's games and 46% of Vancouver Whitecaps's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 62%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Vancouver Whitecaps has the higher season xG average, 2.01 to 1.59 per game. Chicago Fire takes 14.0 shots per game, while Vancouver Whitecaps takes 17.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Chicago Fire leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.96 goals per game after halftime. Vancouver Whitecaps leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.04 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chicago Fire's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). For Vancouver Whitecaps, it is minutes 16-30 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.22 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Vancouver Whitecaps hold a slight edge: they have won 15 of 26 matches this season, compared with Chicago Fire's 12. The visitors are more clinical away from home, averaging 2.18 goals from an xG of 1.92, versus the hosts' 1.83 goals and xG of 1.76 at home. Their defensive record is also stronger: away from home, they concede an average of 1.09 goals against opponents' xG of 1.01, while Chicago's corresponding home figures are 1.17 goals and 1.23. In their last five matches, Vancouver have scored 11 goals and conceded 7, whereas Chicago have scored 7 and conceded 10, further strengthening the case for the visitors. However, the outcome remains uncertain, as Chicago win 58% of their home matches and Vancouver win 55% of their away fixtures.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams’ attacking play supports backing BTTS - Yes: Chicago average 2.33 goals per match and Vancouver 2.18, with xG of 2.08 and 1.92 respectively. In their last five matches, both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of games, while Chicago conceded an average of 2.0 goals over that period, increasing the visitors’ chances of scoring. The hosts also have reason to find the net: Vancouver conceded an average of 1.4 goals in their last five matches, and Chicago average 6.6 shots on target per match. Caution is warranted, however, as BTTS occurred in only 40% of Chicago’s matches and 55% of Vancouver’s matches across the season, while the hosts kept a clean sheet in 47% of games. Despite this, the strength of both attacks and their recent results give a slight edge to the scenario in which both teams score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

At least two goals were scored in 80% of Chicago’s matches and 82% of Vancouver’s, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal. Both teams create chances consistently, with average xG of 2.08 for Chicago and 1.92 for Vancouver, alongside 6.6 and 6.27 shots on target per match, respectively. Chicago’s last five matches averaged 3.4 goals, while Vancouver’s averaged 3.6; all five of the visitors’ matches went over the 2.5-goal line. The higher line is therefore also likely, but season-long rates of matches with at least three goals—67% and 55%—give it less of an edge than Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal for the first half comes from current form: Vancouver led at the break in 3 of its last 5 matches, while Chicago went into half-time trailing in 3 of 5. Over this period, the visitors averaged 1.0 goal before the break, compared with just 0.4 for the hosts, which supports the case for Vancouver to lead at half-time. Vancouver's recent attacking form also points to them maintaining their advantage: they averaged 2.2 goals per match, while Chicago scored 1.4 and conceded 2.0. However, the 2/2 HT/FT pick is not clear-cut, as Chicago won 60% of its home matches over the season and conceded only 0.93 goals per game on average, meaning home-win scenarios also carry significant weight in the forecast.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

48Possession (%)52
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
22Shots15
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
7Shots on target2
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
2.21xG1.54
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
2Corners8
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
46Dangerous attacks63
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
8Fouls11
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
2Cards1
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
1.77Goals scored / game2.27
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
1.46Goals allowed / game1
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
52%Average possession56%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
5.19Shots on target / game6.46
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.04Shots per game17.42
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
5.19Shots on target6.46
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
12.6%Shot conversion13%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
52%Possession56%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
1.59xG for2.01
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
1.42xG against0.99
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire: AttackingVancouver Whitecaps: Dominant
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
Accuracy (shots on target)37%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Vancouver Whitecaps is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Chicago Fire · 1.4 pts / game - Vancouver Whitecaps

Chicago Fire
DDLLW
Season result split
46% W23% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-8
1.62 pts / game · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Vancouver Whitecaps
LWLWD
Season result split
58% W19% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-5-6
1.92 pts / game · goal difference +33
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LDWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.03Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vancouver Whitecaps is 28% better for: goals scored per game.

1.77 goals / game - Chicago Fire · 2.27 goals / game - Vancouver Whitecaps

Vancouver Whitecaps is 46% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.46 goals / game - Chicago Fire · 1 goals / game - Vancouver Whitecaps

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 92% of games (24 of 26 games), while Vancouver Whitecaps keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 games).

Vancouver Whitecaps scoring profile: very strong

Vancouver Whitecaps scores in 85% of games (22 of 26 games), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 games).

46Goals scored (season)59
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
38Goals conceded (season)26
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
3.23Average goals per game3.27
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
7Goals scored (last 5)11
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal85%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
54%2 goals62%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
19%3 goals54%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
8%4 goals15%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal58%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
42%2 goals27%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
27%3 goals12%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
4%4 goals4%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

46%
Vancouver Whitecaps - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 26 games
63%
League average

Goal patterns

35%BTTS at half-time23%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
15%BTTS in both halves12%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
38%Scored in both halves50%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS27%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
60%BTTS - last 560%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vancouver Whitecaps is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.54 pts / game - Chicago Fire · 1.69 pts / game - Vancouver Whitecaps

Chicago Fire - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing
Vancouver Whitecaps - half-time state
50% leading19% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.54Points per game (1st half)1.69
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
0.81Goals scored (1st half)1.23
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
1.46Average goals (1st half)1.85
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
50%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
31%No goal before half-time38%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per game (2nd half)1.92
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
0.96Goals scored (2nd half)1.04
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
1.77Average goals (2nd half)1.42
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
46%Clean sheet after half-time69%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps
38%No goal after half-time27%
Chicago FireVancouver Whitecaps

Chicago Fire - second-half results

35% W27% D38% L
40
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Vancouver Whitecaps - second-half results

50% W42% D8% L
44
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Chicago Fire - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Vancouver Whitecaps - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.60
Goals scored / game1.21.0
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game2.21.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
8
5
16-30
5
10
31-45
6
7
46-60
11
1
61-75
8
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Vancouver Whitecaps
ScoredConceded
10
3
0-15
13
4
16-30
9
9
31-45
7
5
46-60
8
2
61-75
12
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
78%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Vancouver Whitecaps

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
163%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Chicago FireLigaVancouver Whitecaps
Average goals per game• 3.233.22• 3.27
Both teams scored▲ 69%63%▼ 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 73%63%• 62%
Clean sheets▲ 27%21%▲ 42%
Goal before half-time▲ 85%78%▲ 81%
Goal after half-time▲ 85%82%▼ 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.22
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / game
1.39
Away goals / game
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chicago FireYellow cardPhilip Aksel Frigast Zinckernagel
  2. Vancouver WhitecapsSubstitutionOn: Thomas MüllerOff: Aleksa Cvetković
  3. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Mauricio PinedaOff: Anton Jönsson Salétros
  4. Chicago FireYellow cardRobert Jonathan Dean Jr
  5. Vancouver WhitecapsSubstitutionOn: Bruno Steven Caicedo QuiñonezOff: Emmanuel Sabbi
  6. Vancouver WhitecapsSubstitutionOn: Yadaly DiabyOff: Cheikh Tidiane Sabaly
  7. Vancouver WhitecapsYellow cardTate Johnson
  8. Vancouver WhitecapsSubstitutionOn: Samuel Ayomide AdekugbeOff: Tate Johnson
  9. Vancouver WhitecapsSubstitutionOn: Rayan ElloumiOff: Oliver Larraz
  10. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: David PorębaOff: Johan Gomez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire vs Vancouver Whitecaps?

The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 3:1 Vancouver Whitecaps. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs Vancouver Whitecaps?

Chicago Fire score 1.77 goals per game on average and Vancouver Whitecaps 2.27. The MLS average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Chicago Fire's matches and 46% of Vancouver Whitecaps's.

What form are Chicago Fire and Vancouver Whitecaps in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Vancouver Whitecaps 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs Vancouver Whitecaps?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chicago Fire vs Vancouver Whitecaps: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.