Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi: match statistics
Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chindia Târgovişte played against Sepsi in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Chindia Târgovişte has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Sepsi has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Chindia Târgovişte scores 1.52 goals per game and allows 1.32. Sepsi scores 1.68 and allows 0.68. Games in this league average 2.71 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Chindia Târgovişte's games and 44% of Sepsi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 40%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sepsi has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.48 per game. Chindia Târgovişte takes 11.5 shots per game, while Sepsi takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Chindia Târgovişte leads at halftime in 52% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. Sepsi leads at halftime in 44% and scores 1.08 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chindia Târgovişte's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (10 goals). For Sepsi, it is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga II games average 2.71 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sepsi is the favorite for this match: they sit 2nd with 16 wins, 7 draws and 2 losses and 42 goals scored, while Chindia are 6th with 11 wins, 4 draws and 10 losses and 38 goals scored. The form gap is decisive: Chindia have lost their last 5 matches, scoring only 4 and conceding 15 (an average of 3.0 conceded per game), whereas Sepsi in their last five have 3 wins and 2 draws, scoring 7 and conceding just 1 (0.2 conceded per game). At home Chindia average 2.00 goals per game with xG 1.60 and 12.6 shots (4.67 on target) and concede on average 1.08 goals, while Sepsi away average 1.58 goals with xG 1.55, 11.6 shots (4.55 on target) and only 0.83 goals conceded per away match. Although the hosts have a higher shot conversion (16% vs 13% for Sepsi) and more possession (55% vs 51%), Chindia’s last 5 matches (0 points) and 15 goals conceded significantly undermine their defensive credibility; Sepsi, meanwhile, demonstrate defensive stability (only 1 goal conceded in 5 matches) and better recent results. Considering Sepsi’s form advantage, superior season record and defensive stability, I predict an away win and estimate their probabilities at approximately 55% for Sepsi, 25% for a draw and 20% for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The "no" scenario appears more likely (60% vs 40%). Chindia have recorded a clean sheet in 62% of their matches this season and concede an average of 0.54 goals per game, with a season BTTS of only 31%, which historically reduces the probability of Both Teams To Score. Sepsi have a season BTTS of 58%, but have conceded just 1 goal in their last 5 matches (0.2 avg) and their last 5 fixtures show a BTTS rate of 20%, indicating a strong, current defense. Chindia have averaged 0.8 goals in their last 5 matches (4 goals in 5), while Sepsi have scored 7, so the realistic scenario is opponents scoring sporadically without a response from the hosts. Despite similar xG (1.65 vs 1.55) and a league average of 2.69 goals, the combination of the home side's high clean sheet percentage and Sepsi's current form favors a "no" (No Goal / clean sheet expected).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis indicates ~3.00 total goals: Chindia’s attack xG 1.65 vs Sepsi’s defense xG 1.68 yields ~1.67 for the home side, while Sepsi’s attack xG 1.55 vs Chindia’s defense xG 1.12 yields ~1.33 for the visitors (total 3.00). This season Chindia averages 1.77 scored and 0.54 conceded, Sepsi 1.58 scored and 0.83 conceded, with over 2.5 percentages of 31% for Chindia and 50% for Sepsi (mean 40.5%). The last 5 matches show a big form split: Chindia conceded 15 goals in 5 games (3.0 per match), while Sepsi scored 7 and conceded 1, which pushes the likelihood of a higher goal count. BTTS rates are 31% for Chindia and 58% for Sepsi; combined xG=3.00 and Chindia’s weak defense favor Over 2.5 (estimated ~62%). Season-long Over 3.5 rates are low (23%/17% Chindia/Sepsi), so I recommend Over 2.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sepsi led at the break in 58% of their matches this season, and the visitors average 0.75 goals by half-time versus the hosts’ 0.46, indicating Sepsi’s advantage in the first 45 minutes. In their last five fixtures Chindia lost all matches (form: lllll) and conceded an average of 1.8 goals by half-time, while Sepsi in this period practically did not concede before the break. After the break Sepsi also performs better — across the last five games they averaged 2.2 points per match, whereas Chindia accumulated 0.0 points per match in the same span. Although season-long metrics show Chindia with slightly better attacking xG (1.65 vs 1.55) and lower xG conceded (1.12 vs 1.68), current form and the first-half figures favor the visitors. On that basis the most reliable scenario is Sepsi leading at Half-Time and the visitors winning Full-Time, hence the tip '2/2' as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chindia Târgovişte | Sepsi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sepsi is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
1.52 goals / game - Chindia Târgovişte · 1.68 goals / game - Sepsi
Sepsi is 94% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.32 goals / game - Chindia Târgovişte · 0.68 goals / game - Sepsi
Chindia Târgovişte scores in 76% of games (19 of 25 meczów), while Sepsi keeps a clean sheet in 52% (13 of 25 meczów).
Sepsi scores in 88% of games (22 of 25 meczów), while Chindia Târgovişte keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chindia Târgovişte
Over / Under - Sepsi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chindia Târgovişte - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 44%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Sepsi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chindia Târgovişte
Sepsi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Chindia Târgovişte | Liga | Sepsi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.84 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 49% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 49% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 29% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 73% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 82% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Chindia Târgovişte's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Sepsi. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi?
The Liga II match finished Chindia Târgovişte 0:1 Sepsi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi?
Chindia Târgovişte score 1.52 goals per game on average and Sepsi 1.68. The Liga II average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Chindia Târgovişte's matches and 44% of Sepsi's.
What form are Chindia Târgovişte and Sepsi in?
Over the last 5 games Chindia Târgovişte have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Sepsi 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi?
The statistical background for Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


