Romania - Liga IIData current as of 16 July 2026

Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi: match statistics

Chindia Târgovişte crest
Chindia Târgovişte
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Sepsi crest
Sepsi

Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chindia Târgovişte play Sepsi in Liga II (Romania). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 11:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Chindia Târgovişte: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Sepsi: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chindia Târgovişte scores 1.39 and concedes 1.35 goals per match. Sepsi scores 1.61 and concedes 0.77. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chindia Târgovişte 48%, Sepsi 45%. Over 2.5: Chindia Târgovişte 45%, Sepsi 39%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Sepsi has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.41. Chindia Târgovişte: 11.3 shots per match, Sepsi: 11.4.

Match halves

Chindia Târgovişte: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.58. Sepsi: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.03.

Goals by minute

Chindia Târgovişte: 16-30 (10 goals). Sepsi: 46-60 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga II: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Sepsi is the favorite for this match: they sit 2nd with 16 wins, 7 draws and 2 losses and 42 goals scored, while Chindia are 6th with 11 wins, 4 draws and 10 losses and 38 goals scored. The form gap is decisive: Chindia have lost their last 5 matches, scoring only 4 and conceding 15 (an average of 3.0 conceded per game), whereas Sepsi in their last five have 3 wins and 2 draws, scoring 7 and conceding just 1 (0.2 conceded per game). At home Chindia average 2.00 goals per game with xG 1.60 and 12.6 shots (4.67 on target) and concede on average 1.08 goals, while Sepsi away average 1.58 goals with xG 1.55, 11.6 shots (4.55 on target) and only 0.83 goals conceded per away match. Although the hosts have a higher shot conversion (16% vs 13% for Sepsi) and more possession (55% vs 51%), Chindia’s last 5 matches (0 points) and 15 goals conceded significantly undermine their defensive credibility; Sepsi, meanwhile, demonstrate defensive stability (only 1 goal conceded in 5 matches) and better recent results. Considering Sepsi’s form advantage, superior season record and defensive stability, I predict an away win and estimate their probabilities at approximately 55% for Sepsi, 25% for a draw and 20% for the hosts.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
9Shots9
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
0Shots on target4
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
0.94xG1.2
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
5Corners1
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
50Dangerous attacks49
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
12Fouls16
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
0Cards0
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
1.39Goals scored / match1.61
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
1.35Goals conceded / match0.77
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
51%Average possession51%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
4.1Shots on target / match4.1
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.35Shots per match11.39
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
4.1Shots on target4.1
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
12.2%Shot conversion14.2%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
51%Possession51%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
1.41xG for1.54
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
1.58xG against1.41
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

Shooting quality

Chindia Târgovişte: BalancedSepsi: Efficient finishing
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sepsi is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Chindia Târgovişte · 1.4 pts / match - Sepsi

Chindia Târgovişte
LLLWD
Season result split
39% W16% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-14
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Sepsi
LWWLD
Season result split
61% W26% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-8-4
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-4-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sepsi is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.39 goals / match - Chindia Târgovişte · 1.61 goals / match - Sepsi

Sepsi is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.35 goals / match - Chindia Târgovişte · 0.77 goals / match - Sepsi

Chindia Târgovişte scoring profile: strong

Chindia Târgovişte scores in 77% of matches (24 of 31 matches), while Sepsi keeps a clean sheet in 48% (15 of 31 matches).

Sepsi scoring profile: very strong

Sepsi scores in 87% of matches (27 of 31 matches), while Chindia Târgovişte keeps a clean sheet in 32% (10 of 31 matches).

43Goals scored (season)50
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
42Goals conceded (season)24
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
2.74Average goals in match2.39
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal87%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
35%2 goals55%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
19%3 goals13%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
6%4 goals3%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal52%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
42%2 goals23%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
19%3 goals3%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
3%4 goals0%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
Chindia Târgovişte - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 31 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time3%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
6%BTTS in both halves0%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
35%Scored in both halves26%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
80%BTTS - last 560%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chindia Târgovişte - half-time state
45% leading29% draw26% trailing
Sepsi - half-time state
42% leading45% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.65Points per match (1st half)1.71
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.23
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
1.45Average goals (1st half)0.81
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
61%Clean sheet before half-time84%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
42%No goal before half-time55%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

After half-time (2nd half)

1.39Points per match (2nd half)1.77
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)1.03
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.58
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
48%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi
45%No goal after half-time32%
Chindia TârgovişteSepsi

Chindia Târgovişte - second-half results

39% W23% R39% P
51
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding87%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 39%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sepsi - second-half results

48% W32% R19% P
53
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding145%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chindia Târgovişte - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Sepsi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chindia Târgovişte
ScoredConceded
8
7
0-15
10
3
16-30
7
10
31-45
6
7
46-60
6
4
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Sepsi
ScoredConceded
6
0
0-15
6
5
16-30
6
2
31-45
13
4
46-60
8
3
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chindia Târgovişte

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Sepsi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

Chindia TârgovişteLigaSepsi
Average goals in match 2.742.71 2.39
Both teams scored 48%49% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%49% 39%
Clean sheets 32%29% 48%
Goal before half-time 77%72% 58%
Goal after half-time 87%82% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Chindia Târgovişte 0 - 2 - 0 Sepsi. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Sepsi OSK Sfântu Gheorghe
1 : 1
CF Chindia Târgovişte
CF Chindia Târgovişte
1 : 1
Sepsi OSK Sfântu Gheorghe

FAQ

What was the result of Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi?

The Liga II match finished Chindia Târgovişte 0:1 Sepsi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chindia Târgovişte and Sepsi?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chindia Târgovişte won 0, Sepsi won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi?

Chindia Târgovişte score 1.39 goals per game on average and Sepsi 1.61. The Liga II average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Chindia Târgovişte's matches and 45% of Sepsi's.

What form are Chindia Târgovişte and Sepsi in?

Over the last 5 games Chindia Târgovişte have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sepsi 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi?

The statistical background for Chindia Târgovişte vs Sepsi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.