England - Southern League Premier SouthHardenhuish ParkData current as of October 17, 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Chippenham Town vs Havant & Waterlooville: match statistics

Chippenham Town vs Havant & Waterlooville: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chippenham Town plays Havant & Waterlooville in Southern League Premier South (England). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Hardenhuish Park.

Recent form

Chippenham Town has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Havant & Waterlooville has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Chippenham Town scores 0.88 goals per game and allows 2.00. Havant & Waterlooville scores 1.00 and allows 1.78. Games in this league average 3.03 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Chippenham Town's games and 56% of Havant & Waterlooville's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 44%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Havant & Waterlooville has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 0.96 per game. Chippenham Town takes 1.1 shots per game, while Havant & Waterlooville takes 4.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Chippenham Town leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Havant & Waterlooville leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chippenham Town's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Havant & Waterlooville, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Southern League Premier South games average 3.03 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
0.88Goals scored / game1
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
2Goals allowed / game1.78
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
11%Average possession24%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
0Shots on target / game1.67
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

1.13Shots per game4.89
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
0Shots on target1.67
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
77.8%Shot conversion20.5%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
11%Possession24%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
0.96xG for1.47
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
1.65xG against1.38
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

Shooting quality

Chippenham Town: Counter-attackingHavant & Waterlooville: Counter-attacking
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
Accuracy (shots on target)0%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.850.30
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.60

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chippenham Town is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Chippenham Town · 0.4 pts / game - Havant & Waterlooville

Chippenham Town
LLWLL
Season result split
25% W13% D63% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-5
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
DWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Havant & Waterlooville
DLLLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
11% W22% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-6
0.56 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 away
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Havant & Waterlooville is 14% better for: goals scored per game.

0.88 goals / game - Chippenham Town · 1 goals / game - Havant & Waterlooville

Havant & Waterlooville is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.

2 goals / game - Chippenham Town · 1.78 goals / game - Havant & Waterlooville

Chippenham Town scoring profile: strong

Chippenham Town scores in 50% of games (4 of 8 games), while Havant & Waterlooville keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 games).

Havant & Waterlooville scoring profile: very strong

Havant & Waterlooville scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 games), while Chippenham Town keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 games).

7Goals scored (season)9
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
16Goals conceded (season)16
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
2.88Average goals per game2.78
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
3Goals scored (last 5)7
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
11Goals conceded (last 5)10
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal67%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
25%2 goals22%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
13%3 goals11%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
0%4 goals0%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal89%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
75%2 goals67%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
13%3 goals22%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
13%4 goals0%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
Havant & Waterlooville - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 9 games
58%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time22%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
13%BTTS in both halves11%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
13%Scored in both halves11%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
40%BTTS - last 580%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Havant & Waterlooville is 76% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.38 pts / game - Chippenham Town · 0.67 pts / game - Havant & Waterlooville

Chippenham Town - half-time state
0% leading38% draw63% trailing
Havant & Waterlooville - half-time state
11% leading33% draw56% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.38Points per game (1st half)0.67
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
1.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.22
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
13%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
75%No goal before half-time67%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)1.11
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.56
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
38%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville
63%No goal after half-time56%
Chippenham TownHavant & Waterlooville

Chippenham Town - second-half results

38% W13% D50% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.38
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Havant & Waterlooville - second-half results

22% W44% D33% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 11%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Chippenham Town - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.200.80
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game1.60.6
Average goals per game1.81.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-7-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Havant & Waterlooville - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.61.4
Average goals per game1.02.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chippenham Town
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
5
31-45
2
2
46-60
0
2
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Havant & Waterlooville
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
5
16-30
2
3
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
5
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chippenham Town

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.69
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
159%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

Havant & Waterlooville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Southern League Premier South).

Teams vs league

Chippenham TownLigaHavant & Waterlooville
Average goals per game▼ 2.883.03▼ 2.78
Both teams scored▼ 50%58%▼ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%56%▼ 44%
Clean sheets▼ 0%23%▼ 11%
Goal before half-time▲ 88%78%• 78%
Goal after half-time▲ 88%84%▼ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.03
Average goals per game
58%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / game
1.26
Away goals / game
+40%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals